LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Lugosi, Peter (2006)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: tou

Classified by OpenAIRE into

ACM Ref: Data_CODINGANDINFORMATIONTHEORY, ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDSOCIETY, ComputingMilieux_MANAGEMENTOFCOMPUTINGANDINFORMATIONSYSTEMS, InformationSystems_MISCELLANEOUS
This article examines the ways in which problems of concealment emerged in an ethnographic study of a suburban bar and considers how disclosure of the research aims, the recruitment of informants, and elicitation of information was negotiated throughout the fieldwork. The case study demonstrates how the social context and the relationships with specific informants determined overtness or covertness in the research. It is argued that the existing literature on covert research and covert methods provides an inappropriate frame of reference with which to understand concealment in fieldwork. The article illustrates why concealment is sometimes necessary, and often unavoidable, and concludes that the criticisms leveled against covert methods should not stop the fieldworker from engaging in research that involves covertness.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bosk, C. L. (2001). Irony, ethnography, and informed consent. In B. Hoffmaster (Ed.), Bioethics in social context (pp. 199-220). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
    • Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Bulmer, M. (1982a). Ethical problems in social research: The case of covert participant observation. In M. Bulmer (Ed.), Social research ethics: An examination of the merits of covert participant observation (pp. 3-12). London: Macmillan.
    • Bulmer, M. (1982b). The merits and demerits of covert participant observation. In M. Bulmer (Ed.), Social research ethics: An examination of the merits of covert participant observation (pp. 217-251). London: Macmillan.
    • Dingwall, R. (1980). Ethics and ethnography. Sociological Review, 28(4), 871-891.
    • Duncombe, J., & Jessop, J. (2002). 'Doing rapport' and ethics of 'faking friendship.' In M. Mauthner, M. Birch, J. Jessop, & T. Miller (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (pp. 107- 122). London: Sage.
    • Erikson, K. (1995). Commentary. The American Sociologist, 26(2), 4-11.
    • Erikson, K. T. (1967). A comment on disguised observation in sociology. Social Problems, 14(4), 366-373.
    • Esterberg, K. G. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research. London: McGraw-Hill.
    • Finch, J. (1984). It's great to have someone to talk to: The ethics and politics of interviewing women. In C. Bell, & H. Roberts (Eds.), Social researching: Politics, problems, practice (pp. 70-87). London: Routledge.
    • Leo, R. A. (1996). The ethics of deceptive research roles reconsidered: A response to Kai Erikson. The American Sociologist, 27(1), 122-128.
    • Lincoln, Y. S. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(3), 275-289.
    • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. S. (1989). Ethics: The twin failure of positivist science. The Review of Higher Education, 12(3), 221-240.
    • Lincoln, Y. S., & Tierney, W. G. (2004). Qualitative research and institutional review boards. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 219-234.
    • Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (1995). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis (3rd ed.). London: Wadsworth.
    • Noddings, N. (2003). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    • Oakes, J. M. (2002). Risks and wrongs in social science research: An evaluator's guide to the IRB. Evaluation Review, 26(5), 443-479.
    • Oakley, A. (2000). Experiments in knowing: Gender and method in the social sciences. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    • Pryce, K. (1986). Endless pressure (2nd ed.). Bristol: Bristol Classical Press.
    • Punch, M. (1986). The politics and ethics of fieldwork. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    • Punch, M. (1994). Politics and ethics in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 83-97). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Roth, J. A. (1962). Comments on “secret observation.” Social Problems, 9(3), 283-284.
    • Scheper-Hughes, N. (2000). Ire in Ireland. Ethnography, 1(1), 117-140.
    • Whyte, W. F. (1981). Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian slum (3rd ed.). London: University of Chicago Press.
    • Wong, L. M. (1998). The ethics of rapport: Institutional safeguards, resistance, and betrayal. Qualitative Inquiry, 4(2), 178-199.
    • Wright, D. (2004). Creative nonfiction and the academy: A cautionary tale. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 202-206.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article