Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Coole, Carol; Radford, Kathryn; Grant, Mary; Terry, Jane (2012)
Publisher: Springer US
Journal: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Employers, Rehabilitation, Return to work, Work, Vocational rehabilitation, Qualitative research, Stroke, Occupational Therapy, Article
Purpose: More than 40 % of working age adults with stroke fail to return to work. The work context is a key factor in return to work, but little is known about the experiences of employers in supporting employees with stroke. The aim of this study was to explore return to work after stroke from the employer perspective, to identify key features associated with success and to seek participants’ views regarding the role of healthcare in return to work. Methods: Data was gathered through 18 semi-structured interviews with employer stakeholders and included small business owners, line managers, human resources and occupational health staff. Data was analysed thematically. Results: The main themes identified were: the impact of stroke on the employer, characteristics of the employee, communication, knowledge and information, experience of other stakeholders, integrating healthcare in return to work. Conclusion: Employers face complex emotional and practical issues when helping an employee return to work after stroke, for which many lack knowledge and experience. The range and quality of support networks that they access is variable and advice and support from clinicians is welcomed. Further research is necessary to investigate how such support could be funded and integrated within existing service provision.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Daniel K, Wolfe CD, Busch MA, McKevitt C. What are the social consequences of stroke for working-aged adults? A Systematic Review. Stroke. 2009;40(6):e431-40.
    • 2. Saka O, McGuire A, Wolfe C. Cost of stroke in the United Kingdom. Age Ageing. 2009;38(1):27-32.
    • 3. Treger I, Shames J, Giaquinto S, Ring H. Return to work in stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(17):1397-403.
    • 4. Saeki S, Toyonaga T. Determinants of early return to work after first stroke in Japan. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42:254-8.
    • 5. Lindstrom B, Roding J, Sundelin G. Positive attitudes and preserved high level of motor performance are important factors for return to work in younger persons after stroke: a national survey. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:714-8.
    • 6. Vestling M, Tufvesson B, Iwarsson S. Indicators for return to work after stroke and the importance of work for subjective wellbeing and life satisfaction. J Rehabil Med. 2003;35:127-31.
    • 7. Waddell G, Burton AK, Kendall N. Vocational rehabilitation: what works for whom and when? London: TSO; 2008.
    • 8. Frank AO, Thurgood J. Vocational rehabilitation in the UK: opportunities for health-care professionals. Int J Therapy Rehabil. 2006;13(3):126-34.
    • 9. Playford ED, Radford K, Burton C, Gibson A, Jellie B, Sweetland J, Watkins C. Mapping Vocational Rehabilitation Services for people with Long term neurological conditions: Summary report. Department of Health. March 2011. Available from: http://www. ltnc.org.uk Accessed 9 July 2012.
    • 10. Tyerman A, Meehan MJ, editors. Vocational assessment and rehabilitation after acquired brain injury: inter-agency guidelines. London: British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine/Royal College of Physicians; 2004.
    • 11. National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke. 3rd ed. Intercollegiate stroke working party. London: Royal College of Physicians of London; 2008.
    • 12. Department of Health. National stroke strategy. London: UK; 2007.
    • 13. Vocational Rehabilitation Society. Standards of Practice. 2007. http://www.vra-uk.org/civicrm/contribute/transact?reset=1&id= 10 Accessed 9 July 2012.
    • 14. Department of Health. The NHS outcomes framework 2011/12, London; 2010.
    • 15. Deshpande P, Turner-Stokes L. Survey of vocational rehabilitation services available to people with acquired brain injury in the UK. In: Tyerman A, Meehan MJ, editors. Vocational assessment and rehabilitation after acquired brain injury: Inter-agency guidelines. 2004.
    • 16. Care Quality Commission. Supporting life after Stroke: A review of services for people who have had a stroke and their carers. (2011). http://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/media/documents/suppo rting_life_after_stroke_national_report.pdf Accessed 9 July 2012.
    • 17. Radford KA, Grant MI, Terry J, Marr L, Brain N. Developing stroke specific vocational rehabilitation: mapping current service provision. Int J Stroke. 2011;6(Suppl 2):49.
    • 18. Black C, Frost D. Health at work: an independent review of sickness absence. London: TSO; 2011.
    • 19. Department for Work and Pensions. Building capacity for work, A UK framework for vocational rehabilitation, London UK; 2004.
    • 20. Glozier N, Hackett ML, Parag V, Anderson CS. The influence of psychiatric morbidity on return to paid work after stroke in younger adults: the Auckland Regional Community Stroke (ARCOS) Study, 2002 to 2003. Stroke. 2008;39:1526-32.
    • 21. Lock S, Jordan L, Bryan K, Maxim J. Work after stroke: focusing on barriers and enablers. Disabil Soc. 2005;20(1):33-47.
    • 22. Alaszewski A, Alaszewski H, Potter J, Penhale B. Working after a stroke: survivors' experiences and perceptions of barriers to and facilitators of the return to paid employment. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(24):1858-69.
    • 23. Holmgren K, Ivanoff SD. Supervisors' views on employer responsibility in the return to work process. A focus group study. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:93-106.
    • 24. Munir F, Yarker J, Hicks B, Donaldson-Fielder E. Returning employees back to work: developing a measure for supervisors to support return to work. J Occup Rehab. 2012;22:196-208.
    • 25. Culler KH, Wang Y-C, Byers K, Trierweiler R. Barriers and facilitators of return to work for individuals with strokes: perspectives of the stroke survivor, vocational specialist, and employer. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(4):325-40.
    • 26. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77-101.
    • 27. Fylan B, Fylan F, Caveney L. An evaluation of the Statement of Fitness for Work: qualitative work with GPs. Department for Work and Pensions Research Report 780; 2011.
    • 28. Wolfenden B, Grace M. Returning to work after stroke: a review. Int J Rehabil Res. 2009;32:93-7.
    • 29. de Vries G, Koeter MWJ, Nabitz U, Hees HL, Schene AH. Return to work after sick leave due to depression; a conceptual analysis based on perspectives of patients, supervisors and occupational physicians. J Affect Disord. 2011;136(3):1017-26.
    • 30. Lemieux P, Durand M-J, Hong QN. Supervisors' perception of the factors influencing the return to work of workers with common mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21:293-303.
    • 31. Haafkens JA, Kopnina H, Meerman MGM, van Dijk FJH. Facilitating job retention for chronically ill employees: perspectives of line managers and human resource managers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:104.
    • 32. Cunningham I, James P, Dibben P. Bridging the gap between rhetoric and reality: line managers and the protection of job security for ill workers in the modern workplace. Br J Manage. 2004;15:273-90.
    • 33. Amir Z, Wynn P, Chan F, Strauser D, Whitaker S, Luker K. Return to work after cancer in the UK: attitudes and experiences of line managers. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20:435-42.
    • 34. Cohen CA, Colantonio A, Vernich L. Positive aspects of caregiving: rounding out the caregiver experience. Int J Geriat Psychiatr. 2002;17(2):184-8.
    • 35. Park CH, Shin DW, Choi JY, Kang J, Baek YJ, Mo HN, Lee MS, Park SJ, Park SM, Park S. Determinants of the burden and positivity of family caregivers of terminally ill cancer patients in Korea. Psychooncology. 2012;21(3):282-90.
    • 36. Department for Work and Pensions, Department of Health, Health & Safety Executive. Health work and well-being strategy, London UK; 2008.
    • 37. Carbonneau H, Caron C, Desrosiers J. Development of a conceptual framework of positive aspects of caregiving in dementia. Dementia. 2010;9(3):327-353.
    • 38. Improving Work & Health, Changing Lives. The government's response to Dame Carol Black's review of the health of Britain's working age population. London: TSO; 2008.
    • 39. Gard G, Larsson A. How can cooperation between rehabilitation professionals in rehabilitation planning be improved? A qualitative study from the employer's perspective. Work. 2006;26(2): 191-6.
    • 40. Sawney P, Challenor J. Poor communication between health professionals is a barrier to rehabilitation. Occup Med. 2003; 53:246-8.
    • 41. Doucet T, Muller F, Verdun-Esquer C, Debelleix X, Brochard P. Returning to work after a stroke: a retrospective study at the physical and rehabilitation medicine centre ''La Tour de Gassies''. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2012;55(12):112-27.
    • 42. Hussey L, Turner S, Thorley K, McNamee R, Agius R. Comparison of work-related ill health reporting by occupational physicians and general practitioners. Occup Med. 2010;60: 294-300.
    • 43. Sinclair A, Martin R, Tyers C. Occupational Health advice lines: final evaluation. Research Report 793. Department for Work and Pensions; 2012.
    • 44. Lambeek LC, van Mechelen W, Knol DL, Loisel P, Anema JR. Randomised controlled trial of integrated care to reduce disability from chronic low back pain in working and private life. BMJ. 2010;340:c1035.
    • 45. Will MC. Let us pause and reflect: but not too long. Except Child. 1984;51(1):11-6.
    • 46. Bond GR, Drake RE, Becker DR. An update on randomized controlled trials of evidence-based supported employment. Psych Rehab J. 2008;31(4):280-90.
    • 47. Wehman P, Kregel J, Keyser-Marcus L, Sherron-Targett P, Campbell L, West M, Cifu DX. Supported employment for persons with traumatic brain injury: a preliminary investigation of long-term follow-up costs and program efficiency. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(2):192-6.
    • 48. Fadyl JK, McPherson KM. Approaches to vocational rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: a review of the evidence. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009;24(3):195-212.
    • 49. Hart T, Dijkers M, Fraser R, Cicerone K, Bogner JA, Whyte J, Malec J, Waldron B. Vocational services for traumatic brain injury: treatment definition and diversity within model systems of care. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006;21(6):467-82.
    • 50. Soklaridis S, Ammendolia C, Cassidy D. Looking upstream to understand low back pain and return to work: psychosocial factors as the product of system issues. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(9): 1557-66.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article