LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Murray, D; Lee, K; Koziniec, T; Dixon, M (2015)
Publisher: IEEE Computer Society
Languages: English
Types: Part of book or chapter of book
Subjects:

Classified by OpenAIRE into

ACM Ref: ComputerSystemsOrganization_COMPUTER-COMMUNICATIONNETWORKS
Over half of the transmission time in WiFi networks is dedicated to ensuring that errors are corrected or detected. Despite these mechanisms, many studies have concluded that frame error rates vary. An increased understanding of why frames are lost is a pragmatic approach to improving real world 802.11 throughput. The potential beneficiaries of this research, include rate control algorithms, Modulation and Coding Schemes, simulation models, frame size selection and 802.11 configuration guidelines. This paper presents a measurement study of the factors which correlate with packet loss in 802.11 WiFi. Both passive and active approaches were used to investigate how the frame size, modulation and coding scheme and airtime effect the loss rate. Overall, packet errors were high, but the size of frames were not a major determinant of the loss rate. The loss rate decreased with the airtime but at substantially lower rates than those suggested in simple packet error models. Future work will further try to isolate and investigate specific errors, such as head on collisions in the preamble.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] J. Jun, P. Peddabachagari, and M. Sichitiu, “Theoretical maximum throughput of IEEE 802.11 and its applications,” in Network Computing and Applications, 2003. NCA 2003. Second IEEE International Symposium on, pp. 249-256, 2003.
    • [2] A. P. Jardosh, K. N. Ramachandran, K. C. Almeroth, and E. M. BeldingRoyer, “Understanding link-layer behavior in highly congested ieee 802.11b wireless networks,” in Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Experimental approaches to wireless network design and analysis, E-WIND '05, (New York, NY, USA), pp. 11-16, ACM, 2005.
    • [3] M. Rodrig, C. Reis, R. Mahajan, D. Wetherall, and J. Zahorjan, “Measurement-based characterization of 802.11 in a hotspot setting,” in Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Experimental approaches to wireless network design and analysis, E-WIND '05, (New York, USA), pp. 5-10, ACM, 2005.
    • [4] D. Aguayo, J. Bicket, S. Biswas, G. Judd, and R. Morris, “Link- level measurements from an 802.11b mesh network,” in Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, SIGCOMM '04, (New York, NY, USA), pp. 121-132, ACM, 2004.
    • [5] X. Liu, A. Sridharan, S. Machiraju, M. Seshadri, and H. Zang, “Experiences in a 3g network: interplay between the wireless channel and applications,” in Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Mobile computing and networking, MobiCom '08, (New York, NY, USA), pp. 211-222, ACM, 2008.
    • [6] G. Anastasi, E. Borgia, M. Conti, and E. Gregori, “Wi-fi in ad hoc mode: a measurement study,” in Pervasive Computing and Communications, 2004. PerCom 2004. Proceedings of the Second IEEE Annual Conference on, pp. 145-154, 2004.
    • [7] S. Pollin, I. Tan, B. Hodge, C. Chun, and A. Bahai, “Harmful coexistence between 802.15.4 and 802.11: A measurement-based study,” in 3rd In- ternational Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and Communications, CrownCom 2008, pp. 1-6, 2008. [8
    • [8] CiscoSystems, “20 myths of wi-fi interference: Dispel myths to gain high- performing and reliable wireless,” 2007.
    • [9] S. Pal, S. Kundu, K. Basu, and S. Das, “IEEE 802.11 Rate Control Algorithms: Experimentation and Performance Evaluation in Infrastructure Mode,” in Passive and Active Measurement Conference, PAM'06, pp. 30-31, 2006.
    • [10] F. Fietkau and D. Smithies, “Minstrel Rate Control Algorithm Documentation.” http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/ Documentation/mac80211/RateControl/minstrel, 2014.
    • [11] D. Murray, T. Koziniec, and M. Dixon, “D-proxy: Reliability in wireless networks,” in APCC 2010 Asia Pacific Conference on Communications, pp. 129-134, 2010.
    • [12] Intersil-Corporation, “ISL3873 Wireless LAN Integrated Medium Access Controller with Baseband Processor.” Whitepaper Online, 2000.
    • [13] D. Kotz, C. Newport, and C. Elliott, “The mistaken axioms of wirelessnetwork research,” July 2003.
    • [14] D. Halperin, W. Hu, A. Sheth, and D. Wetherall, “Predictable 802.11 packet delivery from wireless channel measurements,” SIGCOMM Com- put. Commun. Rev., vol. 41, Aug. 2010.
    • [15] - o, A. C. Snoeren, G. M. Voelker, and S. Savage, “Jigsaw: solving the puzzle of enterprise 802.11 analysis,” SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., vol. 36, pp. 39-50, Aug. 2006.
    • [16] J. Yeo, M. Youssef, and A. Agrawala, “A framework for wireless lan monitoring and its applications,” in Proceedings of the 3rd ACM workshop on Wireless security, WiSe '04, (New York, NY, USA), pp. 70-79, ACM, 2004.
    • [17] U. Deshpande, C. McDonald, and D. Kotz, “Refocusing in 802.11 wireless measurement,” in Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Passive and active network measurement, PAM'08, (Berlin, Heidelberg), pp. 142-151, Springer-Verlag, 2008.
    • [18] G. Bianchi, F. Formisano, and D. Giustiniano, “802.11b/g link level measurements for an outdoor wireless campus network,” in World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks, WoWMoM 2006. International Symposium on a, pp. 6 pp.-530, 2006.
    • [19] V. Sridhara, S. Hweechul, and S. Bohacek, “Performance of 802.11b/g in the interference limited regime,” in Computer Communications and Networks, 2007. ICCCN 2007. Proceedings of 16th International Conference on, pp. 979-984, Aug 2007. [20
    • [20] D. Murray, T. Koziniec, K. Lee, and M. Dixon, “Large MTUs and internet performance,” in 2012 IEEE 13th International Conference on High Performance Switching and Routing (HPSR), pp. 82-87, 2012.
    • [21] D. Murray and T. Koziniec, “The State of Enterprise Network Traffic in 2012,” in 18th Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications (APCC), 2012.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article