Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Studley, M.; Chambers, S.; Rettie, R.; Burchell, K. (2011)
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
This paper describes the CHARM Energy Study in which mobile technology is used to study the impact of social group feedback on household energy consumption. We describe the background and rationale behind the study, the technology which supports the study, and the study's methodology. The work described herein builds upon similar studies by using mobile technology and on-line feedback to increase the frequency of accurate social group feedback to the participants.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. W. Abrahamse, L. Steg, C. Vlek, and T. Rothengatter. A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3):273-291, Sept. 2005.
    • 2. W. Abrahamse, L. Steg, C. Vlek, and T. Rothengatter. The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, pages 265-276, 2007.
    • 3. H. Allcott. Social norms and energy conservation. Technical report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Oct. 2009.
    • 4. W. Anderson and V. White. The smart way to display. Energy Saving Trust, 2009.
    • 5. S. E. Asch. Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70:1-70, 1956.
    • 6. R. B. Cialdini. Influence: Science and Practice (4th ed.). Allyn and Bacon: Boston, 2001.
    • 7. R. B. Cialdini and N. J. Goldstein. Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55:591-621, 2004.
    • 8. R. B. Cialdini, C. A. Kallgren, and R. R. Reno. A focus theory of normative conduct. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24:201-234, 1991.
    • 9. S. Darby. Energy advice - what is it worth? In European Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, 1999.
    • 10. T. Dietz, G. T. Gardner, J. Gilligan, P. C. Stern, and M. P. Vandenbergh. Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce U.S. carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 106:18452 - 18456, 2009.
    • 11. M. Iyer, W. Kempton, and C. Payne. Comparison groups on bills: Automated, personalized energy information. Energy and Buildings, 38:988-996, 2006.
    • 12. S. Milgram. Obedience to Authority. Harper and Row: New York, 1974.
    • 13. J. M. Nolan, P. W. Schultz, R. B. Cialdini, N. J. Goldstein, and V. Griskevicius. Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34:2008, 913-923.
    • 14. H. W. Perkins. The emergence and evolution of the social norms approach to substance abuse prevention. In H. W. Perkins, editor, The Social Norms Approach to Preventing School and College Age Substance Abuse: A Handbook for Educators, Counselors, and Clinicians, pages 3 - 18. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, 2003.
    • 15. S. Roberts, H. Humphries, and V. Hyldon. Consumer preferences for improving energy consumption feedback. Report to Ofgem, 2007.
    • 16. S. S. Gregory. Europe's smart meter outlook: a $25bn market. Greenbang Research, August 2010.
    • 17. P. W. Schultz, J. M. Nolan, R. B. Cialdini, N. J. Goldstein, and V. Griskevicius. The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18(5):429-434, 2007.
    • 18. E. Shove. Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organisation of Normality. Berg: Oxford, 2003.
    • 19. Smart Metering Team DECC. Consultation on smart metering for electricity and gas. Department of Energy and Climate Change, 2009.
    • 20. Smart Metering Team DECC. Towards a smarter future: Government response to the consultation on electricity and gas smart metering. Department of Energy and Climate Change, 2009.
    • 21. R. H. Thaler and C. R. Sunstein. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press, 2008.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article