Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Fabrizio Zeri; Mario De Cusatis; Luigi Lupelli; Peter Graham Swann (2016)
Publisher: Elsevier
Journal: Journal of Optometry
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: RE1-994, Intraocular pressure, Hidrogel, Presión intraocular, Tonometría de rebote, Contact lens, Original Article, Rebound tonometry, Hydrogel, QC350-467, Ophthalmology, Optometry, Optics. Light, Lentes de contacto

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: eye diseases, sense organs, genetic structures
Purpose - To investigate if the accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using rebound tonometry over disposable hydrogel (etafilcon A) contact lenses (CL) is affected by the positive power of the CLs. Methods - The experimental group comprised 26 subjects, (8 male, 18 female). IOP measurements were undertaken on the subjects’ right eyes in random order using a Rebound Tonometer (ICare). The CLs had powers of +2.00 D and +6.00 D. Measurements were taken over each contact lens and also before and after the CLs had been worn. Results - The IOP measure obtained with both CLs was significantly lower compared to the value without CLs (t test; p < 0.001) but no significant difference was found between the two powers of CLs. Conclusions - Rebound tonometry over positive hydrogel CLs leads to a certain degree of IOP underestimation. This result did not change for the two positive lenses used in the experiment, despite their large difference in power and therefore in lens thickness. Optometrists should bear this in mind when measuring IOP with the rebound tonometer over plus power contact lenses.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya'ale D, et al. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82:844--851.
    • 2. Weinreb RN, Brandt J, Garway-Heath T, Medeiros FA. Intraocular pressure. Amsterdam: Kugler Publications; 2007.
    • 3. Lupelli L, Zeri F. Tonometria senza anestesia farmacologica della cornea. Una rassegna aggiornata. Atti Fondaz Giorgio Ronchi. 1995;2:189--212.
    • 4. Villani S. Un nuovo procedimento di tonometria. Atti Fondaz Giorgio Ronchi. 1972;27:745 [letter].
    • 5. De Luca TJ, Forgacs LS, Skolnick SD. The use of Baush & Lomb Soflens in tonometry. J Am Optom Assoc. 1974;45:1028--1038.
    • 6. Scibilia GD, Ehlers WH, Donshik PC. The effects of therapeutic contact lenses on intraocular pressure measurement. CLAO J. 1996;22:262--265.
    • 7. Kreda SH. Applanation tonometry in contact lens practice. J Am Optom Assoc. 1987;58:208--214.
    • 8. Lim L, Ng TP, Tan DTH. Accurate intraocular pressure measurement in contact lens wearers with normal pressure. CLAO J. 1997;23:130--133.
    • 9. Allen RJ, De Wit D, Saleh GM. Applanation tonometry in silicone hydrogel contact lens wearers. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2007;30:267--269.
    • 10. Zeri F, Lupelli L, Formichella P, Masci C, Fletcher R. Goldmann applanation tonometry over daily disposable contact lens: accuracy and safety of procedure. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2007;30:233--238.
    • 11. Firat PG, Cankaya C, Doganay S, et al. The influence of soft contact lenses on the intraocular pressure measurement. Eye. 2012;26:278--282.
    • 12. Gomes BAF, Turiel P, Cavalcanti RS, Moraes HV, Santhiago MR. The accuracy of Goldmann applanation tonometry over silicone hydrogel contact lenses in patients with glaucoma. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014;37:297--299.
    • 13. Meyer RF, Stanifer RM, Bobb KC. Mackay-Marg tonometry over therapeutic soft contact lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 1978;86:19--23.
    • 14. Panek WC, Boothe WA, Lee DA, Zemplenyi E, Pettit TH. Intraocular pressure measurement with the Tono-Pen through soft contact lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 1990;109:62--65.
    • 15. Khan JA, LaGreca BA. Tono-Pen estimation of intraocular pressure through bandage contact lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;108:422--425.
    • 16. Janoff LE. Intraocular pressure measurement with the tonopen II over a disposable soft lens. ICCL. 1991;18:246--249.
    • 17. Schornack M, Rice M, Hodge D, Tonopen XL. Assessment of intraocular pressure through silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2012;38:270--273.
    • 18. Rubenstein JB, Deutsch TA. Pneumatonometry through bandage contact lenses. Adv Ophthalmol. 1985;103:1660--1661.
    • 19. Krieglestein GK, Waller WK, Reimers H, Langham ME. Augeninnendruckmessung auf weichen kontaktlinsen. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1976;199:223--229.
    • 20. McMonnies CW. Non-contact tonometry through soft contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1986;63:948--951.
    • 21. Insler MS, Robbins RG. Intraocular pressure by noncontact tonometry with and without contact lenses. Adv Ophthalmol. 1987;105:1358--1359.
    • 22. Patel S, Illahi W. Non-contact tonometry over soft contact lenses: effect of contact lens power on the measurement of intra-ocular pressure. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2004;27:33--37.
    • 23. Patel S, Stevenson G. Influence of lens material and intraocular pressure on the outcome of non-contact tonometry over soft contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2009;32:68--72.
    • 24. Liu YC, Huang JY, Wang IJ, Hu FR, Hou YC. Intraocular pressure measurement with the noncontact tonometer through soft contact lenses. J Glaucoma. 2011;20:179--182.
    • 25. Anton A, Neuburger M, Böhringer D, Jordan JF. Comparative measurement of intraocular pressure by Icare tonometry and airpuff tonometry in healthy subjects and patients wearing therapeutic soft contact lenses. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251:1791--1795.
    • 26. Sapkota K, Franco S, Lira M. Intraocular pressure measurement with ocular response analyzer over soft contact lens. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014;37:415--419.
    • 27. Nosch DS, Duddek AP, Herrmann D, Stuhrmann OM. Dynamic contour tonometry over a thin daily disposable hydrogel contact lens. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2010;33:219--224.
    • 28. Gogniat F, Steinegger D, Nosch DS, Joos R, Goldschmidt M. The accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry over soft contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90:125--130.
    • 29. Lam AKC, Tse JSH. Dynamic contour tonometry over silicone hydrogel contact lens. J Optom. 2014;7:91--99.
    • 30. Dekking HM, Coster HD. Dynamic tonometry. Ophthalmologica. 1967;154:59--74.
    • 31. De Moraes CGV, Prata TS, Liebmann J, Ritch R. Modalities of tonometry and their accuracy with respect to corneal thickness and irregularities. J Optom. 2008;1:43--49.
    • 32. Abraham LM, Epasinghe NC, Selva D, Casson R. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer by experienced and inexperienced tonometrists. Eye. 2008;22:503--506.
    • 33. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Castillo A, GarciaSanchez J. Reproducibility and clinical evaluation of rebound tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:4578--4580.
    • 34. Van der Jagt LH, Jansonius NM. Three portable tonometers, the TGDc-01, the ICARE and the Tonopen XL, compared with each other and with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005;25:429--435.
    • 35. Nakamura M, Darhad U, Tatsumi Y, et al. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:332--334.
    • 36. Chui WS, Lam A, Chen D, Chiu R. The influence of corneal properties on rebound tonometry. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:80--84.
    • 37. Johannesson G, Hallberg P, Eklund A, Lindén C. Pascal, ICare and Goldmann applanation tonometry -- a comparative study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2008;86:614--621.
    • 38. Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Parisi L. Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:213--217.
    • 39. Fernandes P, Diaz-Rey JA, Queiros A, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Jorge J. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005;25:436--440.
    • 40. Salvetat ML, M Zeppieri M, Miani F, Tosoni C, Parisi L, Brusini P. Comparison of ICare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty. Eye. 2011;25:642--650.
    • 41. Zeri F, Calcatelli P, Donini B, Lupelli L, Zarrilli L, Swann PG. The effect of hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses on the measurement of intraocular pressure with rebound tonometry. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2011;34:260--265.
    • 42. Garcia-Resua C, Garcia-Montero S, Pena-Verdeal H, Gilino J, Yebra-Pimentel E, Giráldez MJ. Effect of lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel contact lens on intraocular pressure measurement. Optom Rep. 2014;4:7--10.
    • 43. Motolko MA, Feldman F, Hyde M, Hudy D. Sources of variability in the results of applanation tonometry. Can J Ophthalmol. 1982;17:93--95.
    • 44. Khan JA, Graham CE. Effect of contact lens removal or displacement on intraocular pressure. Adv Ophthalmol. 1991;109:825--828.
    • 45. Mauger RR, Likens CP, Applebaum M. Effect of accommodation and repeated applanation tonometry on intraocular pressure. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1984;61:28--30.
    • 46. Read SA, Collins MJ, Becher H, et al. Changes in intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude with accommodation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94:332--335.
    • 47. Queirós A, González-Méijome JM, Fernandes P, et al. Technical note: a comparison of central and peripheral intraocular pressure using rebound tonometry. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007;27:506--511.
    • 48. González-Méijome JM, Jorge J, Queirós A, et al. Age differences in central and peripheral intraocular pressure using a rebound tonometer. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:1495--1500.
    • 49. Beasley IG, Laughton DS, Coldrick BJ, Drew TE, Sallah M, Davies LN. Does rebound tonometry probe misalignment modify intraocular pressure measurements in human eyes? J Ophthalmol. 2013:791084.
    • 50. Danesh-Meyer HV, Papchenko T, Tan YW, Gamble GD. Medically controlled glaucoma patients show greater increase in intraocular pressure than surgically controlled patients with the water drinking test. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1566--1570.
    • 51. Sahin A, Basmak H, Niyaz L, Yildirim N. Reproducibility and tolerability of the Icare rebound tonometer in school children. J Glaucoma. 2007;16:185--188.
    • 52. Flemmons MS, Hsiao YC, Dzau J, Asrani S, Jones S, Freedman SF. Icare rebound tonometry in children with known and suspected glaucoma. J AAPOS. 2011;15:153--157.
    • 53. Flemmons MS, Hsiao YC, Dzau J, Asrani S, Jones S, Freedman SF. Home tonometry for management of pediatric glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152:470--478.
    • 54. Draeger J. Applanationstonometrie auf kontaktlinsen mit holem wassergealt Problem ergebnisse und korrekturfaktoren. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1980;176:38--43.
    • 55. Schollmayer P, Hawlina M. Effect of soft contact lenses on the measurement of intraocular pressure with non-contact pneumotonometry. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2003;220: 840--842.
    • 56. Cobbe C, Tosi R, Baravelli S, et al. Determinazione della tensione oculare mediante pneumotonometro in portatori di lac morbide. Boll Ocul. 1990;69:1203--1207.
    • 57. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000;44:367--408.
    • 58. Ehlers N, Hjortdal J. Corneal thickness: measurement and implications. Exp Eye Res. 2004;78:543--548.
    • 59. Whitaker MM, Stein R. Source of error with use of Goldmanntype tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol. 1993;38:1--30.
    • 60. Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:146--155.
    • 61. Jorge JMM, Gonzalez-Méijome JM, Queiros A, Fernandes P, Parafita MA. Correlations between corneal biomechanical properties measured with the ocular response analyzer and ICare rebound tonometry. J Glaucoma. 2008;17:442--448.
    • 62. Jones L, Subbaraman L, Rogers R, Dumbleton K. Surface treatment, wetting and modulus of silicone hydrogels. Optician. 2006;232:28--34.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.