LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal; Reilly, Jacqueline (2016)
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Journal: Journal of Public Health (Oxford, England)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Original Article, education, employment and skills, educational settings, public health
Background: A dissertation is often a core component of the Masters in Public Health (MPH) qualification. This study aims to explore its purpose, from the perspective of both students and supervisors, and identify practices viewed as constituting good supervision.\ud \ud Methods: A multi-perspective qualitative study drawing on in-depth one-to-one interviews with MPH supervisors (n = 8) and students (n = 10), with data thematically analysed.\ud \ud Results: The MPH dissertation was viewed as providing generic as well as discipline-specific knowledge and skills. It provided an opportunity for in-depth study on a chosen topic but different perspectives were evident as to whether the project should be grounded in public health practice rather than academia. Good supervision practice was thought to require topic knowledge, generic supervision skills (including clear communication of expectations and timely feedback) and adaptation of supervision to meet student needs.\ud \ud Conclusions: Two ideal types of the MPH dissertation process were identified. Supervisor-led projects focus on achieving a clearly defined output based on a supervisor-identified research question and aspire to harmonize research and teaching practice, but often have a narrower focus. Student-led projects may facilitate greater learning opportunities and better develop skills for public health practice but could be at greater risk of course failure.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1 Berridge V, Gorsky M, Mold A. Public Health in HistoryUnderstanding Public Health. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2011.
    • 2 Cohen J, Robertson AM. A postgraduate public-health course: from the students' point of view. Lancet 1961;277:102-5.
    • Griffiths S, Crown J, McEwen J. The role of the Faculty of Public Health (Medicine) in developing a multidisciplinary public health profession in the UK. Public Health 2007;121:420-5.
    • 4 Evans D, Adams L. Through the glass ceiling-and back again: the experiences of two of the first non-medical directors of public health in England. Public Health 2007;121:426-31.
    • 5 Pilkington P. Improving access to and provision of public health education and training in the UK. Public Health 2008;122:1047-50.
    • 6 Jenner D, Hill A, Greenacre J et al. Developing the public health intelligence workforce in the UK. Public Health 2010;124:248-52.
    • Katikireddi SV, Higgins M, Smith KE et al. Health inequalities: the need to move beyond bad behaviours. JECH 2013;67:715-6.
    • McMichael AJ, Beaglehole R. The changing global context of public health. Lancet 2000;356:495-9.
    • McPherson K, Taylor S, Coyle E. For and against: public health does not need to be led by doctors. BMJ 2001;322:1593-6.
    • 10 El Ansari W, Oskrochi R. What matters most? Predictors of student satisfaction in public health educational courses. Public Health 2006;120:462-73.
    • 11 El Ansari W, Russell J, Spence W et al. New skills for a new age: leading the introduction of public health concepts in healthcare curricula. Public Health 2003;117:77-87.
    • 12 El Ansari W, Russell J, Wills J. Education for health: case studies of two multidisciplinary MPH/MSc public health programmes in the UK. Public Health 2003;117:366-76.
    • 13 Le L, Bui Q, Nguyen H et al. Alumni survey of Masters of Public Health (MPH) training at the Hanoi School of Public Health. Hum Resour Health 2007;5:24.
    • 14 Fox MF. Research, teaching, and publication productivity: mutuality versus competition in academia. Sociol Educ 1992;65: 293-305.
    • 15 Gunn V, Draper S, McKendrick M. Research-Teaching Linkages: Enhancing Graduate Attributes-Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences. Mansfield: The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, 2008.
    • 16 Robertson J, Bond CH. Experiences of the relation between teaching and research: what do academics value? High Educ Res Dev 2001;20: 5-19.
    • 17 Pilcher N. The UK postgraduate Masters dissertation: an 'elusive chameleon'? Teach High Educ 2011;16:29-40.
    • 18 Delamont S, Atkinson P, Parry O. Supervising the PhD. A guide to success. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 1997.
    • 19 Kendall M, Murray SA, Carduff E et al. Use of multiperspective qualitative interviews to understand patients' and carers' beliefs, experiences, and needs. BMJ 2009:339.
    • 20 Glaser BG, Strauss AL The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Jersey: Transaction Books, 2009.
    • 21 Mason J. Qualitative Researching, 2nd edn. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 2002.
    • 22 McMichael P. Tales of the unexpected: supervisors' and students' perspectives on short‐term projects and dissertations. Educ Stud 1992;18:299-310.
    • 23 Harrison R, Gemmell I, Reed K. Student satisfaction with a webbased dissertation course: findings from an international distance learning master's programme in public health. Int Rev Res Open Dist Learn 2014;15:182-202.
    • 24 de Kleijn RAM, Bronkhorst LH, Meijer PC, et al. Understanding the up, back, and forward-component in master's thesis supervision with adaptivity. Stud High Educ 2014:1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1080/03075079.2014.980399.
    • 25 Pugsley L, Brigley S, Allery L et al. Making a difference: researching master's and doctoral research programmes in medical education. Med Educ 2008;42:157-63.
    • 26 Struthers J, Laidlaw A, Aiton J, et al. Research-Teaching Linkages: Enhancing Graduate Attributes-Medicine, Dentistry and Veterinary Medicine. Mansfield: The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, 2008.
    • 27 Gabbay J. Courses of action-the case for experiential learning programmes in public health. Public Health 1991;105:39-50.
    • 28 Hattie J, Marsh HW. The relationship between research and teaching: a meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res 1996;66:507-42.
    • 29 Bhopal R. The context and role of the US school of public health: implications for the United Kingdom. J Public Health (Oxf) 1998;20: 144-8.
    • 30 Smith K. Research, policy and funding-academic treadmills and the squeeze on intellectual spaces. Br J Sociol 2010;61:176-95.
    • 31 Drennan J, Clarke M. Coursework master's programmes: the student's experience of research and research supervision. Stud High Educ 2009;34:483-500.
    • 32 Larrivee B. Transforming teaching practice: becoming the critically reflective teacher. Reflect Pract 2000;1:293-307.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

Cite this article