LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Moss, T.P.; Lawson, V.; White, P.; Rumsey, N.; Byron-Daniel, J.; Charlton, R.; Clarke, A.; Clarke, S.A.; Harcourt, D.; McBain, H.; Jenkinson, E.; Lindenmeyer, A.; Newell, R.; Newman, S.; Saul, K.; Thompson, A.R.; Walsh, E.; The, A.R.C. (2015)
Publisher: PeerJ
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Background: The Derriford Appearance Scale24 (DAS24) is a widely used measure of distress and dysfunction in relation to self-consciousness of appearance. It has been used in clinical and research settings, and translated into numerous European and Asian languages. Hitherto, no study has conducted an analysis to determine the underlying factor structure of the scale. \ud \ud Methods: A large (n = 1,265) sample of community and hospital patients with a visible difference were recruited face to face or by post, and completed theDAS24. \ud \ud Results: A two factor solution was generated. An evaluation of the congruence of the factor solutions on each of the the hospital and the community samples using Tucker's Coefficient of Congruence (rc =.979) and confirmatory factor analysis, which demonstrated a consistent factor structure. A main factor, general self consciousness (GSC), was represented by 18 items. Six items comprised a second factor, sexual and body self-consciousness (SBSC). The SBSC scale demonstrated greater sensitivity and specificity in identifying distress for sexually significant areas of the body. \ud \ud Discussion: The factor structure of the DAS24 facilitates a more nuanced interpretation of scores using this scale. Two conceptually and statistically coherent sub-scales were identified. The SBSC sub-scale offers a means of identifying distress and dysfunction around sexually significant areas of the body not previously possible with this scale.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Ahmad I, Masoodi Z, Akhter S, Khurram F. 2013. Aspects of sexual life in patients after burn: the most neglected part of postburn rehabilitation in the developing world. Journal of Burn Care & Research 34(6):e333-e341 DOI 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182779b6d.
    • Bentler PM. 1990. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin 107(2):238-246 DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.
    • Bessell A, Brough V, Clarke A, Harcourt D, Moss T, Rumsey N. 2012a. Evaluation of the effectiveness of face IT, a computer-based psychosocial intervention for disfigurement-related distress. Psychology, Health & Medicine 17(5):565-577 DOI 10.1080/13548506.2011.647701.
    • Bessell A, Dures E, Semple C, Jackson S. 2012b. Addressing appearance-related distress across clinical conditions. British Journal of Nursing 21(19):1138-1143 DOI 10.12968/bjon.2012.21.19.1138.
    • Bundy C. 2012. Visible difference associated with disease: skin conditions. In: Rumsey N, Harcourt D, eds. The Oxford handbook of the psychology of appearance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 398-413.
    • Cano SJ, Bowne JP, Lamping DL, Roberts AHN, McGrouther DA, Black NA. 2004. The patient outcomes of surgery-hand/arm (POS-Hand/Arm): a new patient based outcome measure. Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume) 29(5):477-485 DOI 10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.06.002.
    • Carr T, Harris D, James C. 2000. The Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS-59): a new scale to measure individual responses to living with problems of appearance. British Journal of Health Psychology 5(2):201-215 DOI 10.1348/135910700168865.
    • Carr T, Moss T, Harris D. 2005. The DAS24: a short form of the Derriford Appearance Scale DAS59 to measure individual responses to living with problems of appearance. British Journal of Health Psychology 10(2):285-298 DOI 10.1348/135910705X27613.
    • Cash TF, Ancis JR, Strachan MD. 1997. Gender attitudes, feminist identity, and body images among college women. Sex Roles 36(7-8):433-447 DOI 10.1007/BF02766682.
    • Chatterjee S, Jamieson L, Wiseman F. 1991. Identifying most inuflential observations in factor analysis. Marketing Science 10(2):145-160 DOI 10.1287/mksc.10.2.145.
    • Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. 2002. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling 9(2):233-255 DOI 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902 5.
    • Clarke A, Thompson AR, Jenkinson E, Rumsey N, Newell R. 2013. CBT for appearance anxiety: psychosocial interventions for anxiety due to visible difference. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
    • Claudat K, Warren CS. 2014. Self-objectification, body self-consciousness during sexual activities, and sexual satisfaction in college women. Body Image 11(4):509-515 DOI 10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.07.006.
    • Cole DA. 1987. Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 55(4):584-594 DOI 10.1037/0022-006X.55.4.584.
    • Comrey AL, Lee HB. 1992. A first course in factor analysis . Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
    • Corry N, Pruzinsky T, Rumsey N. 2009. Quality of life and psychosocial adjustment to burn injury: social functioning, body image, and health policy perspectives. International Review of Psychiatry 21(6):539-548 DOI 10.3109/09540260903343901.
    • Feldt LS. 1969. A test of the hypothesis that Cronbach's alpha or Kuder-Richardson coefficient twenty is the same for two tests. Psychometrika 34:363-373 DOI 10.1007/BF02289364.
    • Feldt LS, Woodruff DJ, Salih FA. 1987. Statistical inference for coefficient alpha. Applied Psychological Measurement 11:93-103 DOI 10.1177/014662168701100107.
    • Forbes GB, Collinsworth LL, Jobe RL, Braun KD, Wise LM. 2007. Sexism, hostility toward women, and endorsement of beauty ideals and practices: are beauty ideals associated with oppressive beliefs? Sex Roles 56(5-6):265-273 DOI 10.1007/s11199-006-9161-5.
    • Gerbing DW, Hamilton JG. 1996. Viability of exploratory factor analysis as a precursor to confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 3(1):62-72 DOI 10.1080/10705519609540030.
    • Green JA. 1992. Testing whether correlation matrices are different from each other. Developmental Psychology 28(2):215-224 DOI 10.1037/0012-1649.28.2.215.
    • Jenkinson E. 2012. Therapeutic interventions for people with a visible difference: evidence of effectiveness. In: Rumsey N, Harcourt D, eds. The Oxford handbook of the psychology of appearance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 551-567.
    • Kahn JH. 2006. Factor analysis in counseling psychology research, training, and practice: principles, advances, and applications. The Counseling Psychologist 34(5):684-718 DOI 10.1177/0011000006286347.
    • Kaiser HF, Rice J. 1974. Little jiffy, mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement 34:111-117 DOI 10.1177/001316447403400115.
    • Kline RB. 1998. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. NY: Guilford Press.
    • Koziol JA, Alexander JE, Bauer LO, Kuperman S, Morzorati S, O'Connor SJ, Rohrbuagh J, Projesz B, Begleiter H, Polich J. 1997. A graphical technique for displaying correlation matrices. The American Statistician 51(4):301-304.
    • Lansdown R, Rumsey N, Bradbury E, Carr T, Partridge J. 1997. Visibly different: coping with disfigurement . Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
    • Larntz K, Perlman MD. 1988. A simple test for the equality of correlation matrices. In: Gupta SS, Berger J, eds. Statistical Decision theory and related Topics, vol 2. New York: Spinger-Verlag.
    • Lorenzo-Seva U, ten Berge JMF. 2006. Tucker's congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology 2(2):57-64 DOI 10.1027/1614-2241.2.2.57.
    • MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. 1996. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods 1(2):130-149 DOI 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130.
    • MacGregor FC, Abel TM, Bryt A, Lauer E, Weissmann S. 1953. Facial deformities and plastic surgery; a psychosocial study. Oxford: C. C. Thomas.
    • Marsh HW, Balla JR, McDonald RP. 1988. Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: the effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin 103:391-410 DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391.
    • Marsh HW, Hocevar D. 1985. Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: first-and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin 97(3):562-582 DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.97.3.562.
    • McKenney SJ, Bigler RS. 2014. Internalized sexualization and its relation to sexualized appearance, body surveillance, and body shame among early adolescent girls. The Journal of Early Adolescence Epub ahead of print Oct 27 2014 DOI 10.1111/jora.12179.
    • Moss TP. 2005. The relationships between objective and subjective ratings of disfigurement severity, and psychological adjustment. Body image 2(2):151-159 DOI 10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.03.004.
    • Moss TP, Rosser B. 2012. Adult psychosocial adjustment to visible differences: physical and psychological predictors of variation. In: Rumsey N, Harcourt D, eds. The Oxford handbook of the psychology of appearance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 273-294.
    • Nozawa K, Hayashi K, Nakakita N, Nakayama R, Ishibashi K, Imanishi N, Harris DL. 2008. Development of the Japanese version of Derriford Appearance Scale DAS59: a QOL index for the people who have problems of appearance. Journal of Japan Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 28(7):440-448.
    • Rosser BA, Moss T, Rumsey N. 2010. Attentional and interpretative biases in appearance concern: an investigation of biases in appearance-related information processing. Body Image 7(3):251-254 DOI 10.1016/j.bodyim.2010.02.007.
    • Singh V, Singh R, Moss T, Roy D, Baral D. 2013. Translation and validation of the Nepalese version of Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS-59). Modern Plastic Surgery 3(2):51-56 DOI 10.4236/mps.2013.32010.
    • Taylor S, Harley C, Takeuchi E, Brown J, Velikova G. 2013. Detecting and discussing sexual problems during chemotherapy for breast cancer. The Breast Journal 19:566-567.
    • Taylor S, Harley C, Ziegler L, Brown J, Velikova G. 2011. Interventions for sexual problems following treatment for breast cancer: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 130(3):711-724 DOI 10.1007/s10549-011-1722-9.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article