LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Baggini, Julian (2008)
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: PHI
There is a need to distinguish two questions in the philosophy of persons. One of these is the factual question of identity. This is the question of the conditions of personal identity over time. The other is the first person question of survival. This can be expressed as, “Under which circumstances should I consider a person at another time to be my survivor, who I have reason to care about just as much if he were me?” This second question does not presuppose that the survivor is numerically identical with her predecessor and is the question considered in this thesis.\ud Answering this question requires us to resolve the tension in our concept of a\ud person between, on the one hand, the view of persons as purely physical beings, no more than the sum of their particular parts, bound to the here and now, and on the other hand, as somehow transcendent, beings who exist beyond the here and now.\ud The conception built upon is that offered by Derek Parfit in Reasons and Persons. Two errors in Parfit’s account are explained and amendments suggested. The first is Parfit’s explanation of the unity of a mental life over time in terms of connectedness and continuity between individual, independent thoughts, and secondly his account of connectedness and continuity itself. I suggest that psychological connectedness and continuity must be between persons-at-a-time,\ud not individual thoughts, and that a unified mental life over time is not just a\ud product of enough connections, as Parfit argues, but is determined by the kind of\ud connectedness there is.Logic & Metaphysics
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • BELL, David [1991].Husserl, New York: Routledge
    • BENNETT, Johnathan [1966]. Kant's Analytic (Chapter 8), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • BENNETT, Johnathan [1974]. Kant's Dialectic (Chapters 4-6), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • BRAUDE, Stephen [1991]. First Person Plural, London: Routledge.
    • BRENNAN, Andrew [1987]. “Discontinuity and Identity,” Noûs, v.21, p241-260.
    • BROOK, J.A [1975]. “Imagination, Possibility and Personal Identity,” American Philosophical Quarterly, v.12, p185-198
    • BURMUDEZ, José Luis [1994]. “The Unity of Apperception in the Critique of Pure Reason,” European Journal of Philosophy, v.2, no3, pp213-240
    • CAMPBELL, John [1992]. “The First Person: The Reductionist View of the Self,” in Charles & Lennon.
    • CARRUTHERS, Peter [1986]. Introducing Persons, London: Croom Helm.
    • CASSAM, Quassim [1989]. “Kant and Reductionism,” Review of Metaphysics, v.43, 169, pp72- 106.
    • CASSAM, Quassim [1992]. “Reductionism and First-Person Thinking,” in Charles and Lennon.
    • CASSAM, Quassim [1993]. “Parfit on Persons,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, v.93, pp17-37.
    • CHARLES, David and LENNON, Kathleen (eds.) [1992]. Reduction, Explanation and Realism Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    • COCKBURN, David (ed.) [1991]. Human Beings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • COLLINS, James [1954]. The Mind of Kierkegaard, London: Secker & Warburg.
    • COLLINS, Steven [1982]. Selfless Persons: Imagery and Thought in Theraváda Buddhism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • CURZER, Howard [1991]. “An Ambiguity in Parfit's Theory of Personal Identity,” Ratio, pp16-24.
    • DAWKIN, Richard [1989]. The Selfish Gene (2nd Edition), Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press.
    • DENNETT, Daniel [1992]. “Conditions of Personhood,” in A. Rorty.
    • DESCARTES, René [1641], Meditations on First Philosophy. Translated [1986] by J. Cottingham, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article