LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Howard Peters; Bethan C O'Leary; Julie P Hawkins; Kent E Carpenter; Callum M Roberts
Publisher: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Journal: PLoS ONE
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Q, 2700, R, Research Article, 1300, 1100, Science, Medicine
Marine molluscs represent an estimated 23% of all extant marine taxa, but research into their conservation status has so far failed to reflect this importance, with minimal inclusion on the authoritative Red List of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN). We assessed the status of all 632 valid species of the tropical marine gastropod mollusc, Conus (cone snails), using Red List standards and procedures to lay the groundwork for future decadal monitoring, one of the first fully comprehensive global assessments of a marine taxon. Three-quarters (75.6%) of species were not currently considered at risk of extinction owing to their wide distribution and perceived abundance. However, 6.5% were considered threatened with extinction with a further 4.1% near threatened. Data deficiency prevented 13.8% of species from being categorised although they also possess characteristics that signal concern. Where hotspots of endemism occur, most notably in the Eastern Atlantic, 42.9% of the 98 species from that biogeographical region were classified as threatened or near threatened with extinction. All 14 species included in the highest categories of Critically Endangered and Endangered are endemic to either Cape Verde or Senegal, with each of the three Critically Endangered species restricted to single islands in Cape Verde. Threats to all these species are driven by habitat loss and anthropogenic disturbance, in particular from urban pollution, tourism and coastal development. Our findings show that levels of extinction risk to which cone snails are exposed are of a similar magnitude to those seen in many fully assessed terrestrial taxa. The widely held view that marine species are less at risk is not upheld. © 2013 Peters et al.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Harnik PG, Simpson C, Payne JL (2012) Long-term differences in extinction risk among the seven forms of rarity. Proc Biol Sci 279: 4969-4976. doi:10.1098/ rspb.2012.1902.
    • 2. Roberts CM, Hawkins JP (1999) Extinction risk in the sea. Trends Ecol Evol 14: 241-246.
    • 3. McKinney ML (1998) Is marine biodiversity at less risk? Evidence and implications. Divers Distrib 4: 3-8.
    • 4. McManus JW (1997) Tropical marine fisheries and the future of coral reefs: a brief review with emphasis on Southeast Asia. Coral Reefs 16: S121-S127. doi:10.1007/s003380050248.
    • 5. Jamieson GS (1993) Marine Invertebrate Conservation: Evaluation of Fisheries. Am Zool 33: 551-567.
    • 6. IUCN (2013) IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN Red List Threat Species Version 20122. Available: http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 8 February 2013.
    • 7. Carpenter KE, Abrar M, Aeby G, Aronson RB, Banks S, et al. (2008) One-third of reef-building corals face elevated extinction risk from climate change and local impacts. Science 321: 560-563. doi:10.1126/science.1159196.
    • 8. Newton LC, Parkes EVH, Thompson RC (1993) The Effects of Shell Collecting on the Abundance of Gastropods on Tanzanian Shores. Biol Conserv 63: 241- 245.
    • 9. Queensland Government Dept of Primary Industries and Fisheries (2007) Annual status report 2007 Queensland Marine Specimen Shell Collection Fishery. Available: http://www.daff.qld.gov.au/documents/Fisheries_ SustainableFishing/AnnualStatusReport-QLDMarineSpecimen-ShellCollection Fishery-2007.pdf.
    • 10. Bouchet P (1990) Turrid genera and mode of development: the use and abuse of protoconch morphology. Malacologia: 69-77.
    • 11. Ro¨ckel D, Korn W, Kohn AJ (1995) Manual of the Living Conidae, Vol 1. Verlag Christa Hemmen.
    • 12. Rice T (2007) A Catalog of Dealers' Prices for Shells: Marine, Land and Freshwater, 23rd edition. Of Sea and Shore Publications.
    • 13. Chadwick A, Olivera BM (2009) Cone Shells and Human Culture. Cone Collect 12: 16-21. Available: http://www.theconecollector.com/.
    • 14. Garber K (2005) Peptide leads new class of chronic pain drugs. Nat Biotechnol 23: 399. doi:10.1038/nbt0405-399.
    • 15. Taylor JD, Kantor YI, Sysoev AV (1993) Foregut anatomy, feeding mechanisms, relationships and classification of the Conoidea ( = Toxoglossa) (Gastropoda). Bull Nat Hist Museum London (Zoology) 59: 125-170.
    • 16. Kohn AJ, Perron FE (1994) Life History and Biogeography - Patterns in Conus. Oxford Science Publications.
    • 17. Monteiro A, Tenorio MJ, Poppe GT (2004) A Conchological Iconography. The Family Conidae. The West African and Mediterranean Species of Conus. Germany: ConchBooks, Hackenheim.
    • 18. Tenorio MJ, Tucker JK, Chaney HW (2012) The Families Conilithidae and Conidae - The Cones of the Eastern Pacific. In: Poppe GT, Groh K, editors. A Conchological Iconography. ConchBooks, Hackenheim. p. 200.
    • 19. Franklin JB, Fernando SA, Chalke BA, Krishnan KS (2007) Radular morphology of Conus (Gastropoda: Caenogastropoda: Conidae) from India. Molluscan Res 27: 111-122.
    • 20. Zou S, Li Q, Kong L, Yu H, Zheng X (2011) Comparing the Usefulness of Distance, Monophyly and Character-Based DNA Barcoding Methods in Species Identification: A Case Study of Neogastropoda. PLoS One 6: e26619. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026619.
    • 21. Kohn AJ (1990) Tempo and Mode of Evolution in Conidae. Malacologia 32: 55-67.
    • 22. Duda TF, Kohn AJ (2005) Species-level phylogeography and evolutionary history of the hyperdiverse marine gastropod genus Conus. Mol Phylogenet Evol 34: 257-272. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2004.09.012.
    • 23. Kohn AJ (1983) Marine Biogeography and Evolution in the Tropical Pacific: Zoological Perspectives. Bull Mar Sci 33: 528-535.
    • 24. Kohn AJ (1968) Microhabitats, Abundance and Food of Conus on Atoll Reefs in the Maldive and Chagos Islands. Ecology 49: 1046-1062.
    • 25. Kohn AJ (1959) The Ecology of Conus in Hawaii. Ecol Monogr 29: 47-90.
    • 26. Duda TF, Kohn AJ, Palumbi SR (2001) Origins of diverse feeding ecologies within Conus, a genus of venomous marine gastropods. Biol J Linn Soc 73: 391- 409. doi:10.1006/bijl.2001.0544.
    • 27. Olivera BM, Walker C, Cartier GE, Hooper D, Santos AD, et al. (1999) Speciation of cone snails and interspecific hyperdivergence of their venom peptides. Potential evolutionary significance of introns. Ann N Y Acad Sci 870: 223-237.
    • 28. Livett BG, Gayler KR, Khalil Z (2004) Drugs from the sea: conopeptides as potential therapeutics. Curr Med Chem 11: 1715-1723.
    • 29. Remigio EA, Duda TF (2008) Evolution of ecological specialization and venom of a predatory marine gastropod. Mol Ecol 17: 1156-1162. doi:10.1111/j.1365- 294X.2007.03627.x.
    • 30. Terlau H, Olivera BM (2004) Conus venoms: a rich source of novel ion channeltargeted peptides. Physiol Rev 84: 41-68. doi:10.1152/physrev.00020.2003.
    • 31. Olivera BM (1997) E.E. Just Lecture, 1996. Conus venom peptides, receptor and ion channel targets, and drug design: 50 million years of neuropharmacology. Mol Biol Cell 8: 2101-2109.
    • 32. Craig AG, Bandyopadhyay P, Olivera BM (1999) Post-translationally modified neuropeptides from Conus venoms. Eur J Biochem 264: 271-275.
    • 33. Skilleter GA, Warren S (2000) Effects of habitat modification in mangroves on the structure of mollusc and crab assemblages. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 244: 107- 129. doi:10.1016/S0022-0981(99)00133-1.
    • 34. Carlton JT (1993) Neoextinctions of Marine Invertebrates. Am Zool 33: 499- 509.
    • 35. Zuschin M, Hohenegger J, Steininger FF (2001) Molluscan assemblages on coral reefs and associated hard substrata in the northern Red Sea. Coral Reefs 20: 107-116. doi:10.1007/s003380100140.
    • 36. IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee (2010) Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 8.0.: 85. Available: http:// www.iucnssg.org/tl_files/Assets/pdf/RL Docs/RedListGuidelines.pdf.
    • 37. AfDB OECD, UNDP UNECA (2012) African Economic Outlook 2012, Western African Countries. African Development Bank. Dakar, Senegal. Available: http://www.africaneconomicoutlook.org/en/countries/west-africa/ cape-verde/.
    • 38. Irwin A, Wilson C (2011) Cape Verde. Bradt Travel Guides Ltd.
    • 39. IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. iv.
    • 40. Roberts CM, McClean CJ, Veron JEN, Hawkins JP, Allen GR, et al. (2002) Marine biodiversity hotspots and conservation priorities for tropical reefs. Science 295: 1280-1284. doi:10.1126/science.1067728.
    • 41. Gerlach J, Hoffman Black S, Hochkirch A, Jepsen S, Seddon M, et al. (2012) Terrestrial invertebrate life. In: Collen B, Bo¨hm M, Kemp R, Baillie JEM, editors. Spineless: Status and trends of the world's invertebrates. Zoological Society of London, United Kingdom. pp. 46-57.
    • 42. Darwall W, Seddon M, Clausnitzer V, Cumberlidge N (2012) Freshwater invertebrate life. In: Collen B, Bo¨hm M, Kemp R, Baillie JEM, editors. Spineless: Status and trends of the world's invertebrates. Zoological Society of London, United Kingdom. pp. 26-33.
    • 43. Gonza´lez-Mancebo JM, Dirkse GM, Pati n˜o J, Romaguera F, Werner O, et al. (2012) Applying the IUCN Red List criteria to small-sized plants on oceanic islands: conservation implications for threatened bryophytes in the Canary Islands. Biodivers Conserv 21: 3613-3636. doi:10.1007/s10531-012-0385-0.
    • 44. Kemp R, Peters H, Allcock L, Carpenter KE, Obura D, et al. (2012) Marine invertebrate life. In: Collen B, Bo¨hm M, Kemp R, Baillie JEM, editors. Spineless: Status and trends of the world's invertebrates. Zoological Society of London, United Kingdom. pp. 34-45.
    • 45. Collette BB, Carpenter KE, Polidoro BA, Juan-Jorda MJ, Boustany A, et al. (2011) High Value and Long Life - Double Jeopardy for Tunas and Billfishes. Science (80-) 333: 291-292. doi:10.1126/science.1208730.
    • 46. Roberts CM (2012) Ocean of Life. Allen Lane/Penguin Books.
    • 47. Devantier LM (1992) Rafting of tropical marine organisms on buoyant coralla. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 86: 301-302.
    • 48. Cunha RL, Castilho R, Ru¨ber L, Zardoya R (2005) Patterns of cladogenesis in the venomous marine gastropod genus Conus from the Cape Verde islands. Syst Biol 54: 634-650. doi:10.1080/106351591007471.
    • 49. Duda TF, Palumbi SR (1999) Developmental shifts and species selection in gastropods. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 10272-10277.
    • 50. Myers RA, Hutchings JA, Barrowman NJ (1997) Why do fish stocks collapse? The example of cod in the Atlantic Canada. Ecol Appl 7: 91-106.
    • 51. Thurstan RH, Brockington S, Roberts CM (2010) The effects of 118 years of industrial fishing on UK bottom trawl fisheries. Nat Commun 1: 15. doi:10.1038/ncomms1013.
    • 52. National Marine Fisheries Service (2008) White Abalone Recovery Plan (Haliotis sorenseni). Available: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/recovery/ whiteabalone.pdf.
    • 53. Moore A, Ndobe S (2008) Reefs at risk in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia - status and Outlook. Proceedings of the 11th International Coral Reef Symposium, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, 7-11 July 2008 Session number 18. pp. 840-844. Available: http://nova.edu/ncri/11icrs/proceedings/files/m18-35.pdf.
    • 54. Wells S (1997) Giant clams: Status, trade and mariculture, and the role of CITES in management. IUCN-the World Conservation Union (Gland, Switzerland).
    • 55. Chivian E, Roberts CM, Bernstein AS (2003) The threat to cone snails. Science 302: 391. doi:10.1126/science.302.5644.391b.
    • 56. Chivian E, Roberts CM, Bernstein AS (2004) Response to: How much at risk are cone snails? Science 303: 955-957.
    • 57. Duda TF, Bingham J-P, Livett BG, Kohn AJ, Raybaudi Massilia G, et al. (2004) How much at risk are cone snails? Science 303: 955-957.
    • 58. Hopkins C, Grilley M, Miller C, Shon KJ, Cruz LJ, et al. (1995) A new family of Conus peptides targeted to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. J Biol Chem 270: 22361-22367.
    • 59. Livett BG, Sandall DW, Keays D, Down J, Gayler KR, et al. (2006) Therapeutic applications of conotoxins that target the neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Toxicon 48: 810-829. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2006.07.023.
    • 60. Urbarova I, Karlsen BO, Okkenhaug S, Seternes OM, Johansen SD, et al. (2012) Digital marine bioprospecting: mining new neurotoxin drug candidates from the transcriptomes of cold-water sea anemones. Mar Drugs 10: 2265-2279. doi:10.3390/md10102265.
    • 61. Airoldi L, Balata D, Beck MW (2008) The Gray Zone: Relationships between habitat loss and marine diversity and their applications in conservation. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 366: 8-15. doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2008.07.034.
    • 62. Munday PL (2004) Habitat loss, resource specialization, and extinction on coral reefs. Glob Chang Biol 10: 1642-1647. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00839.x.
    • 63. Thrush SF, Dayton PK (2002) Disturbance to Marine Habitats by Trawling and Dredging: Implications for Marine Biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33: 449- 473. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150515.
    • 64. Watling L, Norse EA (1998) Effects of Mobile Fishing Gear on Marine Benthos. Conserv Biol 12: 1178-1179. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.0120061178.x.
    • 65. Gray JS, Dayton P, Thrush S, Kaiser MJ (2006) On effects of trawling, benthos and sampling design. Mar Pollut Bull 52: 840-843. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.07.003.
    • 66. Dulvy NK, Sadovy Y, Reynolds JD (2003) Extinction vulnerability in marine populations. Fish Fish 4: 25-64. doi:10.1046/j.1467-2979.2003.00105.x.
    • 67. Riascos JM, Heilmayer O, Laudien J (2007) Population dynamics of the tropical bivalve Cardita affinis from Ma´laga Bay, Colombian Pacific related to La Ni n˜a 1999-2000. Helgol Mar Res 62: 63-71. doi:10.1007/s10152-007-0083-6.
    • 68. Australian Government (2012) Record breaking La Nin˜ a events; An analysis of the La Nin˜a life cycle and the impacts and significance of the 2010-11 and 2011-12 La Nin˜ a events in Australia. Melbourne, Australia: Bureau of Meteorology.
    • 69. Doney SC, Fabry VJ, Feely RA, Kleypas JA (2009) Ocean Acidification: The Other CO2 Problem. Ann Rev Mar Sci 1: 169-192. doi:10.1146/annurev.- marine.010908.163834.
    • 70. Rodolfo-Metalpa R, Houlbre`que F, Tambutte´ E´ , Boisson F, Baggini C, et al. (2011) Coral and mollusc resistance to ocean acidification adversely affected by warming. Nat Clim Chang 1: 308-312. doi:10.1038/nclimate1200.
    • 71. Tonge S, Bloxam Q (1991) A review of the captive-breeding programme for Polynesian tree snails. Int Zoo Yearb 30: 51-59.
    • 72. Lopes EP (2010) Recent data on marine bivalves (Mollusca, Bivalvia) of the Cape Verde Islands, with records of six species new to the archipelago. Zool Caboverdiana 1: 59-70.
    • 73. Monteiro A, Malcolm G, Herndl G (2012) Endangered cone species. Cone Collect (Ed A Monteiro): 36. Available: http://www.theconecollector.com/. Accessed 1 January 2013.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article