LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Duwahir, Zahras Mohamed (2016)
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects:
The increase in global carbon dioxide emission has raised concerns about climate change. This has caused nations to consider different carbon dioxide mitigation pathways to reduce emissions. The iron and steel industry contributes to approximately 30% of total global CO2 direct emission in the industrial sector. It is an energy intense industry. Many steel mills are operating close to thermodynamic limits in efficiency. Therefore decarbonising the steel industry through process improvements is limited. Breakthrough technologies such as carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an alternative and attractive solution.\ud \ud In this research I have explored the application of a retrofit carbon capture technology to an existing steel mill. The steel mill chosen, combusts gases arising from the steel making processes. Different locations within the steel mill were analysed, the in-house power station and the turbo blower house were chosen for retrofit post-combustion carbon capture.\ud \ud Two different separation technologies were process modelled to capture the carbon dioxide from the flue gas of the in-house power station and the turbo blower house. The technologies were chemical absorption and adsorption. The two technologies were techno-economically studied.\ud \ud Chemical absorption, with solvent MEA, showed capability of recovering 86% of CO2 with a purity of more than 99 mol%. Adsorption using sorbent zeolite 13X was able to achieve 82% recovery with purity of 96 mol%. Sorbent activated carbon showed a capability of recovering 67% of carbon dioxide with a purity of 95 mol%.\ud \ud The cost of CO2 avoidance for the process using chemical absorption (MEA) was equal to $44.92/tonne CO2. For the process using adsorption (zeolite 13X) the CO2 avoided cost was equal to $44.90/tonne of CO2. Activated carbon was the most expensive capture process, out of the three processes studied. It costs $45.81/tonne of CO2 avoidance.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • ABU-ZAHRA, M. R. M., NIEDERER, J. P. M., FERON, P. H. M. & VERSTEEG, G. F. 2007a. CO2 capture from power plants. Part II. A parametric study of the economical performance based on monoethanolamine. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 1, 135-142.
    • ABU-ZAHRA, M. R. M., SCHNEIDERS, L. H. J., NIEDERER, J. P. M., FERON, P. H. M. & VERSTEEG, G. F. 2007b. CO2 capture from power plants: Part I. A parametric study of the technical performance based on monoethanolamine. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 1, 37-46.
    • BERNSTEIN, L., BOSCH, P., CANZIANI, O., CHEN, Z., CHRIST, R., DAVIDSON, O., HARE, W., HUQ, S., KAROLY, D. & KATTSOV, V. 2007. Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland.
    • HYSYS, A. 2007. User's Guide. Aspen Technology. Inc., Burlington, Massachusetts.
    • IEA. 2008. CO2 Capture and Storage: A Key Carbon Abatement Option [Online]. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264041417-en.
    • IEA. 2010. Key World Energy Statistics 2010 [Online]. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264095243-en.
    • IEA. 2012a. Energy Technology Perspectives 2012 [Online]. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/energy_tech-2012-en.
    • IEA. 2012b. Key World Energy Statistics 2011 [Online]. OECD Publishing. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/key_energ_stat-2011-en.
    • IEA. 2014. Key World Energy Statistics 2014 [Online]. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/key_energ_stat-2014- en.
    • KIM, M.-B., RYU, Y.-K. & LEE, C.-H. 2005. Adsorption Equilibria of Water Vapor on Activated Carbon and DAY Zeolite. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 50, 951-955.
    • KISTER, H. Z., SCHERFFIUS, J., AFSHAR, K. & ABKAR, E. 2007. Realistically predict capacity and pressure drop for packed columns. AIChE meeting. Houston, TX.
    • LIU, Z., LING, L., QIAO, W. & LIU, L. 1999b. Preparation of pitch-based spherical activated carbon with developed mesopore by the aid of ferrocene. Carbon, 37, 663-667.
    • MATHONAT, C., MAJER, V., MATHER, A. E. & GROLIER, J. P. E. 1997. Enthalpies of absorption and solubility of CO2 in aqueous solutions of methyldiethanolamine. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 140, 171-182.
    • MEIJER, K., DENYS, M., LASAR, J., BIRAT, J.-P., STILL, G. & OVERMAAT, B. 2009. ULCOS: ultra-low CO2 steelmaking. Ironmaking & Steelmaking, 36, 249-251.
    • YANG, H., XU, Z., FAN, M., GUPTA, R., SLIMANE, R. B., BLAND, A. E. & WRIGHT, I. 2008. Progress in carbon dioxide separation and capture: A review. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 20, 14-27.
    • ZHANG, J., XIAO, P., LI, G. & WEBLEY, P. A. 2009a. Effect of flue gas impurities on CO2 capture performance from flue gas at coal-fired power stations by vacuum swing adsorption. Energy Procedia, 1, 1115- 1122.
    • ZHANG, Y., CHEN, H., CHEN, C.-C., PLAZA, J. M., DUGAS, R. & ROCHELLE, G. T. 2009b. Rate-Based Process Modeling Study of CO2 Capture with Aqueous Monoethanolamine Solution. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 48, 9233-9246.
    • ZHANG, Z., ZHANG, W., CHEN, X., XIA, Q. & LI, Z. 2010. Adsorption of CO2 on Zeolite 13X and Activated Carbon with Higher Surface Area. Separation Science and Technology, 45, 710-719.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article