Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Rees, Frances; Doherty, Michael; Lanyon, Peter; Davenport, Graham; Riley, Richard D.; Zhang, Weiya; Grainge, Matthew J. (2017)
Publisher: Wiley
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: early diagnosis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, risk prediction, Clinical Practice Research Datalink, RA

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: skin and connective tissue diseases
OBJECTIVES: 1) To compare the primary care consulting behaviour prior to diagnosis of people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) with controls, 2) to develop and validate a risk prediction model to aid earlier SLE diagnosis. \ud \ud METHODS: 1,739 incident SLE cases practice-matched to 6,956 controls from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Odds ratios were calculated for age, gender, consultation rates, selected presenting clinical features and previous diagnoses in the 5 years preceding diagnosis date using logistic regression. A risk prediction model was developed from pre-selected variables using backward stepwise logistic regression. Model discrimination and calibration were tested in an independent validation cohort of 1,831,747 patients. \ud \ud RESULTS: People with SLE had a significantly higher consultation rate than controls (median 9.2 vs 3.8/year) which was in part attributable to clinical features that occur in SLE. The final risk prediction model included the variables age, gender, consultation rate, arthralgia or arthritis, rash, alopecia, sicca, Raynaud's, serositis and fatigue. The model discrimination and calibration in the validation sample was good (Receiver operator characteristic curve: 0.75, 95% CI 0.73-0.78). However, absolute risk predictions for SLE were typically less than 1% due to the rare nature of SLE. \ud \ud CONCLUSIONS: People with SLE consult their GP more frequently and with clinical features attributable to SLE in the five years preceding diagnosis, suggesting that there are potential opportunities to reduce diagnostic delay in primary care. A risk prediction model was developed and validated which may be used to identify people at risk of SLE in future clinical practice. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article