Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Dwyer-Joyce, R.S.; Goodman, M.A.; Lewis, R. (2010)
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Languages: English
Types: Article

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: stomatognathic system, stomatognathic diseases
Wear of dental enamel is a growing problem, but is clinically difficult to diagnose and monitor. An accurate and easy-to-use non-destructive method for the measurement of enamel thickness would be useful for early diagnosis of enamel loss and for monitoring progression. Ultrasound has been identified by several researchers as a potential tool suitable for enamel thickness measurement. However, in vitro studies have shown that while the method is feasible, it suffers from wide variability. The methods proposed to date rely on the measurement of the time of flight of an ultrasonic pulse through the enamel layer. This requires the operator to locate the enamel-dentine junction. In this work, three methods are evaluated to try to reduce this variability and to investigate some practicalities of the approach. Time-of-flight methods using both contact and immersion transducers were used. Immersion transducers gave the most accurate results, within 10-15 per cent of values deduced from tooth sections, but would be harder to arrange for in vivo measurements. Preliminary studies have also shown that it is possible to achieve a resonance in the enamel layer and to measure thickness that way. While this approach needs further experimental refinement, it has the potential to be used for much thinner enamel layer thicknesses.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] Smith, B.G.N., Robb, N.D., 1996, “The Prevalence of Tooth Wear in 1007 Dental Patients”, Oral Rehabilitation, Vol. 23, pp. 232-239.
    • Lewis, R., Dwyer-Joyce, R.S., 2005, “Wear of Human Teeth: A Tribological Perspective”, Proceedings of the IMechE, Part J, Journal of Engineering Tribology, Vol. 259, pp1-18.
    • Milosevic A., Yound P.J., Lennon, M.A., 1994, “The Prevalence of Tooth Wear in 14- year-old School Children in Liverpool”, Community Dental Health, Vol. 11, pp. 83-86.
    • Fejerskov, O.O., Metsen, B., Kaming, T., 1973, “Morphonetic Analysis of Occlusal Fibres in Human Pre-Molars”, Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 81, pp. 505-510.
    • Gillings, B., Buonocore, M., 1961, “An Investigation of Enamel Thickness in Human Lower Incisor Teeth”, Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 40, pp105-118.
    • Schillingsburg, H.T., Grace, C.S., 1973, “Thickness of Enamel and Dentine”, Journal of Southern Californian Dental Association, Vol. 4, pp. 33 - 52.
    • Smith, B.G.N., Knight, J.K., 1984, “An Index for Measuring the Wear of Teeth”, British Dental Journal, Vol. 156, pp. 435-438.
    • Øilo, G., Dahl, B.L., Hatle, G., Gad, A.-L., 1987, “An Index for Evaluating Wear of Teeth”, Acta Odontol. Scand., Vol. 47, pp. 205-210.
    • Lambrechts, P., Braem, M., Vuylsteke-Wauters, M., Vanherle, G., 1989, “Quantitative in vivo Wear of Human Enamel”, Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 68, pp. 1752-1754.
    • [10] Savill, G., Grigor, J., Huntingdon, E., Jackson, R., Lynch, E., 1998, “Toothbrush Design: Adapting for the Future”, International Dental Journal, Vol. 48, pp. 519-525.
    • [11] Kono, R.T., Suwa, G., Tanijiri, T., 2002, “A Three-Dimensional Analysis of Enamel Distribution Patterns in Human Permanent First Molars”, Archives of Oral Biology, Vol. 47, pp. 867-875.
    • [12] Lees S., Barber, F.E., 1968, “Looking into Teeth with Ultrasound”, Science, Vol. 161, pp. 477-478.
    • [13] Kossoff, G. and Sharpe, C.J., (1966), Examination of the Contents of the Pulp Cavity in Teeth, Ultrasonics, Vol. 4, p. 77-83.
    • [14] Gorayeb, S.R., Valle, T., 2002, “Experimental Graduation of Human Teeth using NonInvasive Ultrasound: Echodentography”, IEEE Transactions Ultrasonic Ferroelectrical Frequency Control, Vol. 49, pp. 1437-1443.
    • [15] Culjat, M., Singh R.S., Yoon, D.C., Brown, E.R., 2003, “Imaging of Human Tooth Enamel using Ultrasound”, IEEE Transmission Medical Imaging, Vol. 22, No 4, pp. 526-529.
    • [16] Huysmans, M., Thijsson, J., 2000, “Ultrasonic Measurement of Enamel Thickness: A tool for Monitoring Dental Erosion?”, Journal of Dentistry, Vol. 28, pp. 187-191.
    • [17] Louwerse, C., Kjaeldgaard, M., Huysmans, M., 2004, “The Reproducibility of Ultrasonic Enamel Thickness Measurements: an In-Vitro Study”, Journal of Dentistry, Vol. 32, pp. 83-89.
    • [18] Harris, E.F., Hicks, J.D., 1998, “A Radiographic Assessment of Enamel Thickness in Human Maxillary Incisors”, Archives of Oral Biology, Vol. 43, pp. 825-831.
    • [19] Ng, S., Payne, P., Ferguson M., 1993, “Ultrasonic Imaging of Experimentally launched Tooth Decay”, Proceedings of Int. Conf. on Acoustic Sensing and Imaging, pp. 82-86.
    • [20] Barber, F.E., Lees S., Lobene, R.R., 1968, “Ultrasonic Pulse Echo Measurements in Teeth”, Archives of Oral Biology, Vol. 14, pp. 745-760.
    • [21] Manly, R. S., Hodge, H. C., and Ange, L. E., 1939, “Density and refractive index studies of dental hard tissues. II. Density distribution curves”, J. Dent. Res., Vol. 18, pp. 203- 211.
    • [22] Hosten, B., 1991, Bulk heterogeneous plane-wave propagation through viscoelastic plates and stratified media with large values of frequency-domain, Ultrasonics, Vol. 29, pp. 445- 450.
    • [23] Kinra, V.K., Jaminet, P.T., Zhu, C. and Iyer, V.R., 1994, Simultaneous measurement of the acoustical properties of a thin-layered medium: The inverse problem, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 95, pp. 3059-3074
    • [24] Pialucha, T. and Cawley, P., 1994, “The detection of thin embedded layers using normal incidence ultrasound”, Ultrasonics, Vol. 32, pp. 431-440.
    • [25] Silk, M.G., 1984, Ultrasonic Transducers for Nondestructive Testing, Hilger, Bristol.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article