Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Hopthrow, Tim; Abrams, Dominic (2011)
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects: BF
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Abrams, D., Ando, K., & Hinkle, S. W. (1998). Psychological attachment to the group: Cross-cultural turnover intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1027 1039.
    • Bouas, K. S., & Komorita, S.S., (1996). Group discussion and cooperation in social dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1144-1150.
    • Brenner, M. (1973). The next in line effect. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 320- 323.
    • Caldwell, M. (1976). Communication and sex effects in a fiveJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 273-280.
    • Cohen, T. R., Wildschut, T., & Insko, C. A. (2010). How communication increases interpersonal cooperation in mixed-motive situations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 39- 50.
    • Dawes, R.M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-193.
    • Dawes, R.M., McTavish, J., & Shaklee, H., (1977). Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 1-11.
    • De Vries, N.K., De Dreu, C.K.W., Gordijn, E., & Schuurman, M. (1996). Majority and minority influence: A dual role interpretation. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 145-72). Chichester: Wiley.
    • Frey, L.R. (Ed.) (1995). Innovations in group facilitation: Application in natural settings. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
    • Hogg, M.A., & Hardie, E.A., (1991). Social attraction, personal attraction, and self-categorization: A field study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 175-180.
    • Hopthrow, T., & Hulbert, L.G. (2005). The effect of group decision making on cooperation in social dilemmas. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8, 89-100.
    • Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. II. Channels of group life; social planning and action research. Human Relations, 1, 143-153.
    • MacCoun, R.J. & Kerr, N.L. (1988). Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors' bias for leniency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 21-33.
    • Maier, N.R.F. (1970). Problem solving and creativity; in individuals and groups. California: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
    • Messick, D. M., D. A. Moore, and M. H. Bazerman. (1997). Ultimatum bargaining with a committee: Underestimating the importance of decision rule. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 87-101.
    • Kerr, N.L., Garst, J., Lewandowski, D.A., & Harris, S.E. (1997). That still, small voice: Commitment to cooperate as an internalized versus social norm. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1300-1311.
    • Komorita, S.S. & Parks, C.D. (1994). Social dilemmas. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
    • Orbell, J., van de Kragt, A., & Dawes, R. (1988). Explaining discussion induced cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 811-819.
    • P Game theory as a theory of conflict resolution (pp. 18-34). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.
    • Stasser, G. (1992). Information salience and the discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: a thought experiment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 156-181.
    • Sunwolf, & Seibold, D.R. (1999). The impact of formal procedures on group processes, members, and task outcomes. In L.R.Frey, D.S.Gouran, & M.S.Poole (Eds.), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 288-312). London: Sage.
    • van de Kragt, A., Orbell, J., & Dawes , R., Braver, S., & Wilson. I., (1986) Doing well and doing good as ways of resolving social dilemmas. In H. Wilke, D. Messick, & C. Rutte (Eds.), Experimental social dilemmas (pp. 177-203). Frankfurt am Main, FRG: Verlag Peter Lang.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article