LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Williams, Matthew Leighton; Hudson, Kirsty Joanne (2013)
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HN, HT, HV

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: behavior and behavior mechanisms, psychological phenomena and processes, human activities, fungi
This paper examines public perceptions of three sexual grooming types: computer-mediated sexual grooming (CMSG), familial sexual grooming (FSG) and localised sexual grooming (LSG). Using data from a national survey of 557 respondents from the United Kingdom, we tested models that predicted perceptions of the prevalence of CMSG, FSG and LSG and the perceived safety of internet, familial and localised grooming spaces. Media-related factors were the most significant in predicting higher levels of perceived prevalence of CMSG and disagreement in relation to safety of internet and public spaces. Knowledge of a grooming victim was most significant in predicting higher levels of perceived prevalence of FSG and LSG and higher levels disagreement in relation to the safety of the home. The findings suggest that the public express too little concern over familial sexual grooming and that initiatives should be introduced to make citizens more aware of the distinctions between types of sexual grooming behaviours, settings and offenders.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Brayford, J. & Deering, J. (2012). Media influences on public perceptions of sex offenders. In J. Bradford, F. Cowe & J. Deering (Eds). Sex offenders: Punish, help, change or control? Theory, policy and practice explored (pp. 52-68). London: Routledge.
    • Brown, S., Deakin, J., & Spencer, J. (2008). What people think about the management of sex offenders in the Community. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 47, 259-274.
    • Carr, J. (2004). Child abuse, child pornography and the internet. London: NCH, The Children's Charity.
    • Child Exploitation and Online Protection (CEOP) (2011). Out of mind, out of sight: Breaking down the barrier to understanding child sexual exploitation. London: Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre.
    • Craven, S., Brown, S., & Gilchrist, E. (2006). Sexual grooming of children: Review of literature and theoretical considerations. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 3, 287-299.
    • Craven, S., Brown, S. J., & Gilchrist, E. (2007). Current responses to sexual grooming: Implications for prevention. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 60-71.
    • Davidson, J. (2008). Child sexual abuse: Media Representations and government reactions. London: Routledge-Cavendish.
    • Davidson, J., & Gottschalk, P. (2011). Internet child abuse: Current research and policy. London: Routledge-Cavendish.
    • Davidson, J., & Martellozzo, E. (2008). Protecting children online: Towards a safer internet. In G. Letherby, K. Williams, P. Birch & M. Cain (Eds). Sex as crime? (pp. 338-355). Cullompton: Willan.
    • Dorofeev, S., & Grant, P. (2006). Statistics for real-life sample surveys: Non-simple random samples and weighted data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Farrell, P., & Soothill, K. (2001). Television documentaries on sex offenders: The emergence of a new genre? Police Journal, 74, 61- 67.
    • Fielding, N., Lee, R., M., & Black, G. (2008). The SAGE handbook of online research methods. London: Sage.
    • Finkelhor, D. (1984). Child sexual abuse: New theory and research. New York: Free Press.
    • Flatley, J., Smith, K., Chaplin, R., & Moon, D. (2010). Crime in England and Wales 2009/10: Findings from the British Crime Survey and Police Recorded Crime, 3rd edn. London: Home Office.
    • Gillespie, A. (2004). Tackling grooming. Police Journal, 77, 239.
    • Greer, C. (2003). Sex crime and the media. Cullompton: Willan.
    • Hall, G. C. N., & Hirschman, R. (1992). Sexual aggression against children: A conceptual perspective of etiology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 19, 8-23.
    • Hudson, K. J. (2005). Offending identities: Sex offenders' perspectives of their treatment and management. Cullompton: Willan.
    • Jewkes, Y. (2010). Much ado about nothing? Representations and realities of online soliciting of children. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 16, 5-18.
    • Jewkes, Y. (2004). Media and crime. London: Sage.
    • Jewkes, Y. (2007). Crime online. Cullompton: Willan.
    • Joinson, A. N. (1998). Causes and effects of disinhibition on the internet. In J. Gackenbach (Ed.). The psychology of the internet (pp. 43-60). New York: Academic Press.
    • Kitzinger, J. (2004). Framing abuse: Media influence and public understandings of sexual violence against children. New York: Pluto.
    • Livingstone, S. & Bober, M. (2004). UK children go online: Surveying the experiences of young people and their parents. London: LSE Report (launched 21 July 2004).
    • Levenson, J. S., Brannon, Y. N., & Baker, J. (2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analysis of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7, 1-15.
    • Martellozzo, E. (2011a). Understanding the perpetrators' online behaviour. In J. Davidson & P. Gottschalk (Eds). Internet child abuse: Current research and policy (pp. 104-125). London: Routledge.
    • Martellozzo, E. (2011b). Online child sexual abuse: Grooming, policing and child protection in a multi-media world. London: Routledge.
    • McAlinden, A. M. (2006). ''Setting 'em up': Personal, familial and institutional grooming in the sexual abuse of children. Social and Legal Studies, 15, 339-362.
    • McCarten, K. (2004). ''HERE THERE BE MONSTERS'': The public's perception of paedophiles with particular reference to Belfast and Leicester. Medicine, Science and the Law, 44, 327-342.
    • McCartan, K. F. (2010). Media constructions and reactions to paedophilia in modern society. In K. Harrison (Ed.). Dealing with high-risk sex offenders in the community: Risk management, treatment and social responsibilities (pp. 249 -
    • McCartan, K. & McAlister, R. (2011). Mobile phone technology and sexual abuse. Paper presented at The Welsh Centre for Crime and Social Justice Annual Conference 2011, Gregynog, Wales.
    • Meyer, I. H., & Wilson, P. A. (2009). Sampling lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 23-31.
    • Mohan, J., Twigg, L., & Taylor, J. (2011). Mind the double gap: Using multivariate multilevel modelling to investigate public perceptions of crime trends. British Journal of Criminology, 51, 1035-1053.
    • O'Connell, R. (2001). Be somebody else but be yourself at all times: Degrees of identity deception in chat rooms. Cyberspace Research Unit. Available at: B http://www.once.uclan.ac.uk/print/deception_print.htm! (accessed September 2011).
    • O'Halloran, E., & Quayle, E. (2010). A content analysis of a ''boy love'' support forum: Revisiting Durkin & Bryant. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 16, 71-85.
    • Olver, M. E., & Barlow, A. A. (2010). Public attitudes toward sex offenders and their relationship to personality traits and demographic characteristics. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 28, 832-849.
    • Ost, S. (2004). Getting to grips with sexual grooming? The new offence under the Sexual Offences Act 2003. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 26, 147-159.
    • Ost, S. (2009). Child pornography and sexual grooming: Legal and societal responses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Proctor, J. L., Badzinski, D. M., & Johnson, M. (2002). The impact of media on knowledge and perceptions of Megan's Law. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 13, 356-379.
    • Quayle, E. (2008). Sex offenders on the internet. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1320-1321.
    • Reiner, R. (2007). Media made criminality: The representation of crime in the mass media. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan & R. Reiner (Eds). The Oxford handbook of criminology (pp. 302-337). Oxford University Press: Oxford.
    • Sampson, A. (1994). Acts of abuse. London: Routledge.
    • Schiavone, S. K., & Jeglic, E. L (2009). Public perception of sex offender social policies and the impact on sex offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53, 679-695.
    • Silverman, J., & Wilson, D. (2002). Innocence betrayed: Paedophilia, the media and society. Cambridge: Polity Press. Soothill, K., & Walby, S. (1991). Sex crimes in the news. London: Routledge.
    • Stop it Now (2003). What we all need to know to protect our children. Available at: B http://www.stopitnow.org.uk/files/ protect%20our%20children.pdf! (accessed September 2011).
    • Sullivan, J., & Beech, A. (2002). Professional perpetrators: Sex offenders who use their employment to target and sexually abuse the children with whom they work. Child Abuse Review, 11, 153-167.
    • Taylor, M. & Quayle, E. (2008). Criminogenic qualities of the internet in the collection and distribution of abuse images of children. Irish Journal of Psychology, 29(2), 119-130.
    • Thakker, J. (2012). Public attitudes to sex offenders in New Zealand. Journal of Sexual Aggression: An international, interdisciplinary forum for research, theory and practice, 18(2), 149-163.
    • Ward, T. (2002). Marshall and Barbaree's integrated theory of child sexual abuse: A critique. Psychology, Crime and Law, 8, 209- 228.
    • Ward, T., & Siegert, R. (2002). Toward a comprehensive theory of child sexual abuse: A theory knitting perspective.
    • Psychology, Crime and Law, 8, 319-351.
    • Ward, T., Hudson, S. M., & Marshall, W. L. (1995). Cognitive distortions and affective deficits in sex offenders: A cognitive deconstructionist interpretation. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 7, 67-83.
    • Webster, S., Davidson, J., & Bifulco, A. (2011). European Online Grooming Project Annual Report. Brussels: European Commission Safer Internet Plus Programme.
    • Webster, S., Davidson, J., Bifulco, A., Gottschalk, P., Caretti, V., Pham, T., & Grove-Hills, J. (2010). European Online Grooming Project, Scoping Report. Brussels: European Commission Safer Internet Plus Programme.
    • Williams, M. (2006). Virtually criminal: Crime, deviance and regulation online. London: Routledge.
    • Wolf, S. C. (1984). A model of sexual aggression/addiction. Journal of Social Work and Human Sexuality, 7, 131-148.
    • Zamble, E., & Kalm, K. L. (1990). General and specific measures of public attitudes towards sentencing. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 22, 327-337.
    • Zilney, L. J., & Zilney, L. A. (2009). Reconsidering sex crimes and offenders: Prosecution or persecution?. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article