LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Gibson, Stephen (2012)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: BF
Identifiers:doi:10.1002/casp.1099
The present paper argues for a discourse analytic approach to social psychological peace research, and demonstrates the potential of such an approach through a re-specification of the concept of attitudes to war. This is illustrated through an analysis of a series of televised debates broadcast in the UK in February-March 2003, in the build-up to the formal outbreak of the Iraq War. Analysis draws attention to the importance of rhetorical context and function, the inseparability of attitude object and evaluation, and the formulation of evaluations as specific or general. Findings are discussed in the context of recent calls for methodological pluralism in social psychological peace research, with a suggestion that matters of epistemology stand prior to methodology.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Anderson, C. A., Benjamin Jr., A. J., Wood, P. K., & Bonaccia, A. M. (2006). Development and testing of the Velicer attitudes toward violence scale: Evidence for a four-factor model. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 122-136. doi: 10.1002/ab.20112
    • Antaki, C., Condor, S., & Levine, M. (1996). Social identities in talk: Speakers' own orientations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 473-492.
    • Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S. (1998). Identities in talk. London: Sage.
    • Augoustinos, M. & Every, D. (2010). Accusations and denials of racism: Managing moral accountability in public discourse. Discourse & Society, 21, 251-256. DOI: 10.1177/0957926509360650
    • Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behaviour? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396-403. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00051.x
    • Billig, M. (1985). Prejudice, categorization and particularization: From a perceptual to a rhetorical approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 79-103. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420150107
    • Billig, M. (1996). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Billig, M., & MacMillan, K. (2005). Metaphor, idiom and ideology: The search for 'no smoking guns' across time. Discourse and Society, 16, 459-480. doi: 10.1177/0957926505053050
    • Blumberg, H. H., Hare, A. P., & Costin, A. (2006). Peace psychology: A comprehensive introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Cohrs, J. C. & Moschner, B. (2002). Antiwar knowledge and generalized political attitudes as determinants of attitude toward the Kosovo war. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 8, 139-155. doi: 10.1207/S15327949PAC0802_03
    • Cohrs, J. C., Moschner, B., Maes, J., & Kielmann, S. (2005). Personal values and attitudes toward war. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 11, 293-312. doi: 10.1207/s15327949pac1103_5
    • Condor, S., Figgou, L., Abell, J., Gibson, S. & Stevenson, C. (2006). "They're not racist": Prejudice denial, mitigation and suppression in dialogue. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 441-462. doi: 10.1348/014466605X66817
    • Durrheim, K. (1997). Peace talk and violence: An analysis of the power of 'peace'. In A. Levett, A. Kottler, E. Burman, & I. Parker (Eds), Culture, power and difference: Discourse analysis in South Africa (pp. 31-43). London: Zed Books.
    • Durrheim, K., & Dixon, J. (2004). Attitudes in the fiber of everyday life: The discourse of racial evaluation and the lived experience of desegregation. American Psychologist, 59, 626-636. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.7.626
    • Edwards, D. & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
    • Gibson, S. & Abell, J. (2004). For Queen and country?: National frames of reference in the talk of soldiers in England. Human Relations, 57, 871-891. doi: 10.1177/0018726704045769
    • Gibson, S. & Condor, S. (2009). State institutions and social identity: National representation in soldiers' and civilians' interview talk concerning military service. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 313-336. doi: 10.1348/014466608X349496
    • Griffin, C. (2007). Being dead and being there: Research interviews, sharing hand cream and the preference for analysing 'naturally occurring data'. Discourse Studies, 9, 246-269. doi: 10.1177/1461445607075340
    • Herrera, M. (2003). Constructing social categories and seeking collective influence: Self-categorization and the discursive construction of conflict. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 3, 27-57.
    • Hewitt, J. P., & Stokes, R. (1975). Disclaimers. American Sociological Review, 40, 1-11.
    • Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Cambridge: Polity.
    • Jackson, R. (2005). Writing the war on terrorism: Language, politics and counter - terrorism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    • Lakoff, G. (1990). Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. Unpublished manuscript, University of California at Berkeley.
    • McFarland, S. G. (2005). On the eve of war: Authoritarianism, social dominance, and Amercian students' attitudes toward attacking Iraq. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 360-367. doi: 10.1177/0146167204271596
    • McKenzie, K. (2001). Fact and the narratives of war: Produced undecidability in accounts of armed conflict. Human Studies, 24, 187-209. doi: 10.1023/A:1017543122464
    • Myers, G. (1999). Unspoken speech: Hypothetical reported discourse and the rhetoric of everyday talk. Text, 19, 571-590.
    • Pomerantz, A. M. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9, 219-229. doi:10.1007/BF00148128
    • Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.
    • Potter, J. (1998). Discursive social psychology: From attitudes to evaluative practices. European Review of Social Psychology, 9, 233-266. doi: 10.1080/14792779843000090
    • Potter, J., & Edwards, D. (2001). Discursive social psychology. In W. P. Robinson & H. Giles (Eds), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 103-118). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
    • Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2005). Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 281-307. doi: 10.1191/1478088705qp045oa
    • Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
    • Roccato, M., & Fedi, A. (2007). 'Not in my name'? The Italians and the war in Iraq. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 229-236. doi: 10.1002/casp.905
    • Schäffner, C. & Wenden, A. L. (1995). Language and peace. London: Routledge.
    • Sherman, R. C. (1973). Dimensional salience in the perception of nations as a function of attitudes toward war and anticipated social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 65-73. doi: 10.1037/h0034474
    • Stapel, D. A., & Marx, D. M. (2007). Making sense of war: Using the interpretation comparison model to understand the Iraq conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 401-420. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.369
    • Tajfel, H. (1972). Experiments in a vacuum. In J. Israel & H. Tajfel (Eds), The context of social psychology (pp. 69-121). London: Academic Press.
    • van Dijk, T. A. (1992). Discourse and the denial of racism. Discourse and Society, 3, 87-118. doi: 10.1177/0957926592003001005
    • van Dijk, T. A. (2005). War rhetoric of a little ally: Political implicatures and Aznar's legitimatization of the war in Iraq. Journal of Language and Politics, 4, 65-91.
    • Vollhardt, J. K., & Bilali, R. (2008). Social psychology's contribution to the psychological study of peace: A review. Social Psychology, 39, 12-25. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335.39.1.12
    • Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society, 9, 387- 412. doi: 10.1177/0957926598009003005
    • Wiggins, S., & Potter, J. (2003). Attitudes and evaluative practices: Category vs. item and subjective vs. objective constructions in everyday food assessments. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 513-531. doi: 10.1348/014466603322595257
    • Wiggins, S., & Potter, J. (2008). Discursive psychology. In C. Willig & W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 73-90). London: Sage.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article