LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Beynon-Davies, Paul (2014)
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects: H1

Classified by OpenAIRE into

ACM Ref: GeneralLiterature_MISCELLANEOUS
This paper examines the role of design comics within business analysis. We first consider background to the use of comics within design work. This leads us to collate a number of advantages to using design comics as an intermediate and user-centric representation within acts of business analysis. We then describe our own use of design comics for making sense of socio-technical organisation and conclude with a discussion of the importance of comics within acts of collaboration between business analyst and organisational actors.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the synthesis of form. Harvard University Press, Harvard, Mass.
    • Avison, D., F. Lau, M. D. Myers and P. A. Nielsen (1999). Action Research. Communications of the ACM 42(1): 94-97.
    • Baskerville, R. and M. D. Myers (2004). Special issue on action research in information systems: making IS relevant to practice. MIS Quarterly 28(3): 329-335.
    • Beynon-Davies, P. (2011). Significance: exploring the nature of information, systems and technology. Palgrave, Houndmills, Basingstoke.
    • Beynon-Davies, P. (2013). Declarations of significance: exploring the pragmatic nature of information systems. European Conference on Information Systems, Utrecht, Holland.
    • Bijker, W. E. (2009). Social Construction of Technology. A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. J. K. B. Olsen, S. A. Pedersen and V. F. Hendricks. Wiley-Blackwell,Oxford, UK.
    • Boland, R. J. (1987). The In-formation of Information Systems. Critical Issues in Information Systems Research. R. J. Boland and R. A. Hirschheim. John Wiley,New York.
    • Carroll, J. M., Ed. (1995). Scenario-Based Design: envisioning work and technology in systems development. New York, John Wiley.
    • Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. John Wiley, Chichester.
    • Clark, H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge University Press, New York.
    • Cohen, M. D. (2007). Reading Dewey: reflections on the study of routine. Organization Studies 28(5): 773-786.
    • Dietz, J. L. G. (2006). The Deep Structure of Business Processes. Communications of the ACM 49(5): 59-64.
    • Eisner, W. (1996). Graphic storytelling. Poorhouse press, Tamarac.
    • Feldman, M. S. and B. T. Pentland (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly 48(1): 94-118.
    • Gershon, N. and W. Page (2001). What storytelling can do for information visualisation. Comm. of ACM 44(8): 31-37.
    • Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of a theory of structuration. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.
    • Gregor, S. and D. Jones (2007). The Anatomy of a Design Theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5(2): 312-355.
    • Haesen, M., J. Meskens, K. Luyten and K. Coninx (2009). Supporting mutlidisciplinary team and early design stages using storyboards. Human-Computer Interaction 5610: 616-623.
    • Lederman, R. and R. B. Johnston (2007). Are Routine Manual Systems Genuine Information Systems? Information Systems Foundations, Theory, Reality and Representation. D. N. Hart and S. D. Gregor. Australian National University Press.,Acton, Australia.
    • Lederman, R. and R. B. Johnston (2011). Decision support or support for situated choice: lessons for system design from effective manual systems. European Journal of Information Systems 20(5): 510-528.
    • McCloud, S. (1994). Understanding comics: the invisible art. First Harper, New York.
    • McKay, J. and P. Marshall (2001). The dual imperatives of action research. Information Technology and People 14(1): 46-59.
    • Pentland, B. and M. S. Feldman (2007). Narrative Networks: Patterns of Technology and Organization. Organization Science 18(5): 781-795.
    • Pentland, B. and M. S. Feldman (2008). Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action. Information and Organization 18: 235-250.
    • Rowe, F. (2012). Toward a richer diversity of genres in Information Systems research. European Journal of Information Systems 21(5): 469-478.
    • Searle, J. R. (2010). Making the social world: the structure of human civilization. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    • Sidorova, A. (2009). Business analysis in the Information Systems Curriculum: Implications of Business Analysis Professionalization. Americas Conference on Information Systems. San Francisco.
    • Sidorova, A. (2013). Business Analysis as an Opportunity for IS Programs in Business Schools. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 33(31).
    • Simmons, A. (2001). The story factor: secrets of influence from the art of storytelling. Perseus Publishing, Cambridge.
    • Tsitchizris, D. C. and F. H. Lochovsky (1982). Data Models. Prentice-Hall, Englewood-Cliffs.
    • Van der Leslie, C. (2006). The value of storyboards in the product design process. Personal and ubiquitous computing 10(3): 159-162.
    • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Sage Publications, Oxford.
    • Yetim, F. (2006). Acting with genres: discursive-ethical concepts for reflecting on and legitimating genres. European Journal of Infomation Systems 15(1): 54-69.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article