LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Madianou, Mirca; Longboan, Liezel; Ong, Jonathan (2015)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Voice—understood as the ability to give an account of oneself and participate in social processes—is increasingly recognized as significant for humanitarian action and disaster recovery. Giving disaster-affected people the opportunity to make their voices heard has the potential to democratize humanitarianism and correct the power asymmetries on which it is based. Humanitarian agencies have embraced interactive communication technologies as tools for voice and participation. Drawing on a yearlong ethnography with communities affected by super-Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines, this article assesses the potential of new communication technologies for voice. Our findings highlight a disconnect between assumptions about technology present in humanitarian policies and the actual uses of technology by affected populations. The article traces the factors that facilitate, or hinder, participation and finds that communication technologies enable voice only if other parameters, such as a strong civil society, are present. Further, we observe that opportunities for voice are stratified, mapping onto existing social inequalities.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Adams, V. (2013). Markets of sorrow, labors of faith. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
    • Ahmed, S. (2012). On being included. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Beltran, C. (2014). No papers, no fear: DREAM activism, new social media and the queering of immigrant rights. In A. Davila & Y. Rivero (Eds.), Contemporary Latino/a media: Production, circulation and politics (pp. 245-267). New York, NY: New York University Press.
    • Butler, J. (2005). Giving an account of oneself. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
    • Cannell, F. (1999). Power and intimacy in the Christian Philippines. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University
    • Clair, R. P. (2006). Narratives in the old neighborhood: An ethnographic study of an urban neighborhood's stories. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(6), 1244-1261.
    • Coronel, S. (2001). The role of media in deepening democracy. Retrieved from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan010194.pdf
    • Couldry, N. (2008). Digital storytelling, media research and democracy. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Digital storytelling, mediatized stories: Self representation in new media (pp. 41-60). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
    • Couldry, N. (2010). Why voice matters: Culture and politics after neoliberalism. London, UK: SAGE Publications.
    • Curato, N., & Ong, J. C. (2015). Inclusion as deliberative agency: The selective representation of poor women in debates and documentaries about reproductive health. Television and New Media, 16(6), 576-594.
    • de Waal, A. (1997). Famine crimes: Politics and the disaster relief industry in Africa. London, UK: James Currey.
    • Fassin, D., & Vasquez, P. (2005). Humanitarian exception as the rule: The political theology of the 1999 Tragedia in Venezuela. American Ethnologist, 32(3), 382-405.
    • Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Continuum.
    • Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    • Gilligan, C. (1982/1993). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Glen, C. (2004). Unspoken: A rhetoric of silence. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
    • Hallin, D., & Papathanassopoulos, S. (2002) Political clientelism and the media: southern Europe and Latin America in comparative perspective. Media, Culture and Society, 24, 175-195.
    • Honneth, A. (1996). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Longboan, L. (2011) E-gorots: Exploring indigenous identity in translocal spaces. Southeast Asian Research, 19(2), 319-341.
    • Madianou, M. (2012). News as a looking glass: Shame and the symbolic power of mediation. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 15(1), 3-16.
    • Madianou, M. (2013). Ethics of mediation and the voice of the injured subject. In N. Couldry, M. Madianou, & A. Pinchevski (Eds.), Ethics of media (pp. 178-197). London, UK: Palgrave.
    • Madianou, M., & Miller, M. (2013). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 169-187.
    • Mayer, V. (2014). Signs of home. Public Culture, 26(3), 369-377.
    • McKay, D. (2012). Global Filipinos. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    • Meier, P. (2015). Digital humanitarians. London, UK: CRC Press.
    • Miller, D. (1998) Introduction: Why some things matter. In D. Miller (Ed.), Material Cultures (pp. 3-24). London, UK: UCL Press.
    • Miller, D., & Slater, D. (2000). The Internet: An ethnographic approach. Oxford, UK: Berg.
    • Mouzelis, N. (1978). Class and clientelistic politics. Sociological Review, 26(3), 471-497.
    • Murthy, D., & Longwell, S. (2013). Twitter and disasters: The uses of Twitter in the 2010 Pakistan floods. Information, Communication & Society, 16(6), 837-855.
    • Nussbaum, M. (2001). Upheavals of thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    • Ong, J. C. (2015). The poverty of television: The mediation of suffering in class-divided Philippines. London, UK: Anthem Press.
    • Rafael, V. (1990). Patronage and pornography: Ideology and spectatorship in the Marcos years. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 32(2), 282-304.
    • Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and narrative. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
    • Starbird, K. & Palen, L. (2011). Voluntweeters: Self-organising by digital volunteers in times of crisis. Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2011). Vancouver, CA.
    • Skeggs, B. (1997). Formations of class and gender: Becoming respectable. London, UK: SAGE Publications.
    • Tacchi, J. (2008). Voice and poverty. Media and Development, 1, 12-15.
    • Tacchi, J. (2011). Open content creation: The issue of voice and the challenges of listening. New Media & Society, 14(4), 652-668.
    • Tufte, T, & Mefalopulos, P. (2009). Participatory communication: A practical guide. World Bank Working Paper 170. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

  • RCUK | Urgent invite: Humanitaria...

Cite this article