LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Martin, Graham P.; Currie, Graeme; Finn, Rachael (2009)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Efforts to ‘modernize’ the clinical workforce of the English National Health Service have sought to reconfigure the responsibilities of professional groups in pursuit of more effective, joined-up service provision. Such efforts have met resistance from professions eager to protect their jurisdictions, deploying legitimacy claims familiar from the insights of the sociology of professions. Yet to date few studies of professional boundaries have grounded these insights in the specific context of policy challenges to the inter- and intra-professional division of labour, in relation the medical profession and other health-related occupations. In this paper we address this gap by considering the experience of newly instituted general practitioners (family physicians) with a special interest (GPSIs) in genetics, introduced to improve genetics knowledge and practice in primary care. Using qualitative data from four comparative case studies, we discuss how an established intra-professional division of labour within medicine—between clinical geneticists and GPs—was opened, negotiated and reclosed in these sites. We discuss the contrasting attitudes towards the nature of genetics knowledge and its application of GPSIs and geneticists, and how these were used to advance conflicting visions of what the nascent GPSI role should involve. In particular, we show how the claims to knowledge of geneticists and GPSIs interacted with wider policy pressures to produce a rather more conservative redistribution of power and responsibility across the intra-professional boundary than the rhetoric of modernization might suggest.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Abbott,A.D. (1988). The system of professions. London: University of Chicago Press.
    • Alvesson,M., & Kärreman,D. (2001). Odd couple: making sense of the curious concept of knowledge management. Journal of Management Studies, 38(7), 995-1018.
    • Boggis,A.R.J., & Cornford,C.S. (2007). General Practitioners with special clinical interests: a qualitative study of the views of doctors, health managers and patients. Health Policy, 80(1), 172-178.
    • Charles-Jones,H., Latimer,J., & May,C. (2003). Transforming general practice: the redistribution of medical work in primary care. Sociology of Health & Illness, 25(1), 71-92.
    • Coast,J., Noble,S., Noble,A., Horrocks,S., Asim,O., Peters,T.J., & Salisbury,C. (2005). Economic evaluation of a general practitioner with special interest led dermatology service in primary care. British Medical Journal, 54 50-56.
    • Coburn,D. (1993). State authority, medical dominance, and trends in the regulation of the health professions: the Ontario case. Social Science & Medicine, 37(7), 841-850.
    • Coburn,D., & Willis,E. (2000). The medical profession: knowledge, power and autonomy. In G.L. Albrecht, R. Fitzpatrick, & S.C. Scrimshaw (Eds.), Handbook of social studies in health and medicine (pp.377-393). London: Sage.
    • Currie,G., & Suhomlinova,O. (2006). The impact of institutional forces upon knowledge sharing in the UK NHS: the triumph of professional power and the inconsistency of policy. Public Administration, 84(1), 1-30.
    • Department of Health (2002). HR in the NHS Plan. London: Department of Health.
    • Dreyfus,H.L., & Dreyfus,S.E. (1986). Mind over machine. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Eisenhardt,K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
    • Evans,D. (2003). 'Taking public health out of the ghetto': the policy and practice of multidisciplinary public health in the United Kingdom. Social Science & Medicine, 57(6), 959-967.
    • Foley,L., & Faircloth,C.A. (2003). Medicine as discursive resource: legitimation in the work narratives of midwives. Sociology of Health & Illness, 25(2), 165-184.
    • Freidson,E. (1970). Profession of medicine. New York: Harper & Row.
    • Freidson,E. (1984). The changing nature of professional control. Annual Review of Sociology, 10(1), 1-20.
    • Harrison,S., & Ahmad,W.I.U. (2000). Medical autonomy and the UK state 1975 to 2025. Sociology, 34(1), 129-146.
    • Harrison,S., Hunter,D.J., Marnoch,G., & Pollitt,C. (1992). Just managing. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
    • Hibbert,D., Hanratty,B., May,C., Mair,F., Litva,A., & Capewell,S. (2003). Negotiating palliative care expertise in the medical world. Social Science & Medicine, 57(2), 277-288.
    • Jones,R., Rosen,R., Tomlin,Z., Cavanagh,M.-R., & Oxley, D. (2005). General practitioners with special interests: evolution and evaluation. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 11(2), 106-109.
    • Kernick,D., & Mannion,R. (2005). Developing an evidence base for intermediate care delivered by GPs with a special interest. British Journal of General Practice, 55 908-910.
    • Klein,R. (2006). The new politics of the NHS. Oxford: Radcliffe.
    • Lancet (2007). Reformation of the NHS: ending professional divisions. The Lancet, 370 1393.
    • Larson,M.S. (1990). In the matter of experts and professionals, or how impossible it is to leave nothing unsaid. In R. Torstendahl, & M. Burrage (Eds.), The formation of professions (pp.24-50). London: Sage.
    • Lupton,D. (1997). Doctors on the medical profession. Sociology of Health & Illness, 19(4), 480-497.
    • McDonald,R., Harrison,S., Checkland,K., Campbell,S.M., & Roland,M. (2007). Impact of financial incentives on clinical autonomy and internal motivation in primary care: ethnographic study. British Medical Journal, 334 1357-1359.
    • McKinlay,J., & Marceau,L. (2008) When there is no doctor: reasons for the disappearance of primary care physicians in the US during the early 21st century. Social Science & Medicine, 67(10), 1481-1491.
    • Mclaughlin,J., & Webster,A. (1998). Rationalising knowledge: IT systems, professional identities and power. Sociological Review, 46(4), 781-802.
    • Mizrachi,N., & Shuval,J.T. (2005). Between formal and enacted policy: changing the contours of boundaries. Social Science & Medicine, 60(7), 1649-1660.
    • Nancarrow,S.A., & Borthwick,A.M. (2005). Dynamic professional boundaries in the healthcare workforce. Sociology of Health & Illness, 27(7), 897-919.
    • Nocon,A., & Leese,B. (2004). The role of UK general practitioners with special clinical interests: implications for policy and service delivery. British Journal of General Practice, 54 50-56.
    • Norris,P. (2001). How 'we' are different from 'them': occupational boundary maintenance in the treatment of musculo-skeletal problems. Sociology of Health & Illness, 23(1), 24-43.
    • Reed,M.I. (1996). Expert power and control in late modernity: an empirical review and theoretical synthesis. Organization Studies, 17(4), 573-597.
    • Sandberg,J. (2000). Understanding human competence at work: an interpretative approach. Academy of Management Review, 43(1), 9-25.
    • Sanders,T., & Harrison,S. (2008). Professional legitimacy claims in the multidisciplinary workplace: the case of heart failure care. Sociology of Health & Illness, 30(2), 289-308.
    • Scott,W.R. (2008). Lords of the Dance: professionals as institutional agents. Organization Studies, 29(2), 219-238.
    • Secretary of State for Health (2000). The NHS plan. London: The Stationery Office.
    • Secretary of State for Health (2003). Our inheritance, our future. London: The Stationery Office.
    • Secretary of State for Health (2006). Our health, our care, our say. London: The Stationery Office.
    • Shortell,S.M., Gillies,R.R., Anderson,D.A., Erickson,K.M., & Mitchell,J.B. (2000). Remaking health care in America. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    • Stevens,F.C.J., Diederiks,J.P.M., Grit,F., & Horst,F.v.d. (2007). Exclusive, idiosyncratic and collective expertise in the interprofessional arena: the case of optometry and eye care in the Netherlands. Sociology of Health & Illness, 29(4), 481-496.
    • Zetka,J.R. (2001). Occupational divisions of labor and their technology politics: the case of surgical scopes and gastrointestinal medicine. Social Forces, 79(4), 1495-1520.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article