Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Weigert, S. (2000)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Each scheme of state reconstruction comes down to parametrize the state of a quantum system by expectation values or probabilities directly measurable in an experiment. It is argued that the time evolution of these quantities provides an unambiguous description of the quantal dynamics. This is shown explicitly for a single spin s, using a quorum of expectation values which contains no redundant information. The quantum mechanical time evolution of the system is rephrased in terms of a closed set of linear first-order differential equation coupling (2s+1)2 expectation values. This new representation of the dynamical law refers neither to the wave function of the system nor to its statistical operator.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1997);
    • M. G. Raymer, Contemp. Phys. 38, 343 (1997). [2] C. Kurtsiefer, T. Pfau, and J. Mlynek, Nature (London) 386,
    • 150 (1997); T. J. Dunn, I. A. Walmsley, and S. Mukamel,
    • Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 884 (1995); D. T. Smithey, M. Beck,
    • M. G. Raymer, and A. Faridani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1244
    • (1993). [3] D. Leibfried, D. Meekhof, B. E. King, C. Monroe, W. M.
    • Itano, and D. J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4281 (1996). [4] St. Weigert, State reconstruction and its conceptual impli-
    • 9809065). [5] The phases of the states are fixed by the transformation
    • 21 s2mj2m . [6] U. Fano, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 74 (1957). [7] F. T. Arecchi, E. Courtens, R. Gilmore, and H. Thomas,
    • Phys. Rev. A 6, 2211 (1972). [8] J.-P. Amiet and St. Weigert, quant-ph / 99070101. Some
    • Ns unit vectors nmm0 , m, m0 2s, . . . , s, distributed over
    • 2s 1 1 cones about the z axis with different opening
    • angles such that the set of the 2s 1 1 directions on each
    • 2p 2s 1 1 [J.-P. Amiet and St. Weigert, J. Phys. A 32,
    • L269 (1999) quant-ph / 9903067. [9] W. H. Greub, Linear Algebra (Springer, Berlin, 1963). [10] G. A. Baker, Phys. Rev. 109, 2198 (1958). [11] W. K. Wooters, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 176, 1 (1987); U. Leon-
    • hardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4101 (1995). [12] S. Mancini, V. I. Man'ko, and P. Tombesi, Found. Phys.
    • 27, 801 (1997); V. I. Man'ko and G. Marmo, quant-ph /
    • 9903021. [13] E. P. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 40, 749 (1932); J-P. Amiet and
    • M. Cibils, J. Phys. A 24, 1515 (1991). [14] A. Perelomov, Generalized Coherent States and their Ap-
    • plications (Springer, Berlin, 1986). [15] G. Lindblad, Commun. Math. Phys. 48, 119 (1976);
    • A. Royer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3272 (1996). [16] M. Jammer, Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechan-
    • ics (Wiley, New York, 1974). [17] E. Schrödinger, Naturwissenschaften 23, 823 (1935),
    • Sect. 7.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article