LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Ferguson, Harry (2016)
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
The delivery of welfare and professional helping, such as in medicine, nursing and social work is largely treated as though it is achieved through static and immobile practices. Research has been dominated by a focus on the sedentary as studies have stayed rooted in places like hospitals and offices, failing to follow practitioners when they go out to see their service users in their communities and homes. This paper explores the mobile character of professional helping through a focus on social work by examining what its practices look like through the lens of movement based social science. The paper draws on empirical data from my mobile and sensory ethnography of child protection work, where I went along with social workers and interviewed them in the car and observed them on home visits to families. It is argued that attention to movement gets to the heart of what these practices are, as shown in the multiple meanings of car journeys, and how keeping children safe relies on worker’s capacities to move their bodies when in the home by walking, playing with and staying close to the child. Professional help goes on through what Jenson calls “negotiation in motion”. Fundamentally, social work is work on the move.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Barker, J. 2009. 'Driven to distraction?' Children's experiences of car travel. Mobilities 4, no. 1: 59-76.
    • Brennan, T. 2004. The transmission of afect. New York: Cornell University Press.
    • Broadhurst, K., and C. Mason. 2014. Social work beyond the VDU: Foregrounding co-presence in situated practice - Why face-to-face practice matters. British Journal of Social Work 44, no. 3: 578-595.
    • Broadhurst, K., D. Wastell, S. White, C. Hall, S. Peckover, K. Thompson, A. Pithouse, and D. Davey. 2010. Performing 'initial assessment': Identifying the latent conditions for error at the front-door of local authority children's services. British Journal of Social Work 40, no. 2: 352-370.
    • Bull, M. 2004. Automobility and the power of sound. Theory, Culture and Society 21: 243-259.
    • Buscher, M., J. Urry, and K. Whichger, eds. 2011. Mobile methods. London: Routledge.
    • Clark, A., and N. Emmel. 2010. Using walking interviews. Manchester: University of Manchester, National Centre for Research Methods.
    • Dant, T. 2004. The driver-car. Theory, Culture and Society 21: 61-79.
    • Department for Education. 2013. Working together to safeguard children: A guide to inter-agency working to safeguard and promote the welfare of children. London: Department for Education.
    • Evans, T., and J. Harris. 2004. Street-level bureaucracy, social work and the (exaggerated) death of discretion. British Journal of Social Work 34, no. 6: 871-895.
    • Ferguson, H. 2008. Liquid social work: Rethinking welfare interventions as mobile practices. British Journal of Social Work 38: 561-579.
    • Ferguson, H. 2009. Driven to care: The car, automobility and social work. Mobilities 4, no. 2: 275-293.
    • Ferguson, H. 2010. Walks, home visits and atmospheres: Risk and the everyday practices and mobilities of social work and child protection. British Journal of Social Work 40: 1100-1117.
    • Ferguson, H. 2011. Child protection practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Ferguson, H. 2016a. Researching social work practice close up: Using ethnographic and mobile methods to understand encounters between social workers, children and families. British Journal of Social Work 46: 153-168.
    • Ferguson, H. 2016b. What social workers do in performing child protection work: Evidence from research into face-to-face practice. Child and Family Social Work 21: 283-294.
    • Ferguson, H. 2016c. How children become invisible in child protection work: Evidence from day-to-day social work practice. British Journal of Social Work 1-17. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcw065.
    • Ferguson, H. 2016d. Making home visits: Creativity and the embodied practices of home visiting in social work and child protection. Qualitative Social Work 1-17. doi:10.1177/1473325016656751.
    • Floersch, J. 2002. Meds, money, and manners. New York: Columbia University Press.
    • Gottschalk, S., and M. Salvaggio. 2015. Stuck inside of mobile: Ethnography in non-places. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 44: 3-33.
    • Hall, T.A., and R.J. Smith. 2013. Stop and go: A field study of pedestrian practice. Immobility and Urban Outreach Work. Mobilities 8, no. 2: 272-292.
    • Ingold, T. 2011. Being alive. London: Routledge.
    • Jenson, O. 2013. Staging mobilities. London: Routledge.
    • Jenson, O., M. Sheller, and S. Wind. 2015. Together and apart: Aefctive ambiences and negotiation in families' everyday life and mobility. Mobilities 10: 363-382.
    • Jeyasingham, D. 2016. Open spaces, supple bodies? Considering the impact of agile working on social work ofice practices. Child and Family Social Work 21: 209-217.
    • Kanter, J. 2004. Face-to-face with children: The life and work of Clare Winnicott. London: Karnac.
    • Kesserling, S. 2006. Pioneering mobilities: New patterns of movement and motility in a mobile world. Environment and Planning A 38: 269-279.
    • Kusenbach, M. 2003. Street phenomenology: The go-along as ethnographic research tool. Ethnography 4, no. 3: 455-485.
    • Laurier, E., H. Lorimer, B. Brown, O. Jones, O. Juhlin, A. Noble, M. Perry, D. Pica, P. Sormani, I. Strebel, et al. 2008. Driving and 'passengering': Notes on the ordinary organization of car travel. Mobilities 3, no. 1: 1-23.
    • Lipsey, M. 1980. Street level bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
    • London Borough of Brent. 1985. A child in trust: Report of the panel of inquiry investigating the circumstances surrounding the death of Jasmine Beckford. London: London Borough of Brent.
    • Pink, S. 2015. Doing sensory ethnography. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
    • Pink, S., J. Morgan, and A. Dainty. 2015. Other people's homes as sites of uncertainty: Ways of knowing and being safe. Environment and Planning A 47: 450-464.
    • Pink, S., and K. Leder-Mackley. 2016. Moving, making and atmosphere: Routines of home as sites for mundane improvisation. Mobilities 11: 171-187.
    • Ross, N., E. Renold, S. Holland, and A. Hillman. 2009. Moving stories: Using mobile methods to explore the everyday lives of young people in public care. Qualitative Research 9: 605-623.
    • Roy, A., J. Hughes, L. Froggett, and J. Christensen. 2015. Using mobile methods to explore the lives of marginalised young men in Manchester. In Innovations in social work research, eds. L. Hardwick, R. Smith, and A. Worsley, 155-172. London: Jessica Kingsley.
    • Sheller, M. 2004. Automotive emotions: Feeling the car. Theory, Culture and Society 21, nos. 4-5: 221-242.
    • Sheller, M., and J. Urry. 2006. The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A 38: 207-226.
    • Smith, M. 2003. Gorgons, cars and the frightful fiend: Representations of fear in social work and counselling. Journal of Social Work Practice 17, no. 2: 154-162.
    • Smith, R. 2011. Gofman's interaction order at the margins: Stigma, role, and normalization in the outreach encounter. Symbolic Interaction 34, no. 3: 357-376.
    • Urry, J. 2000. Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. London: Routledge.
    • Urry, J. 2007. Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity.
    • Walsh, M.J. 2010. Driving to the beat of one's own hum: Automobility and musical listening. In Studies in symbolic interaction. 35 vols, ed. Norman K. Denzin, 201-221. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
    • Webb, S. 2006. Social work in a risk society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article