LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Beaumont, Richard Alun
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects:
This research project considers approaches to enhancing the engagement of academics with Knowledge Transfer in UK Higher Education. The research, undertaken within the Health and Education School of Middlesex University, utilised an innovative approach through the application of an Action Research (AR) framework in supporting personal and organisational development. Through insider-researcher led AR Cycles, knowledge and theory was developed co-productively, leading to the development, implementation and embedding of a Rewards and Incentives Scheme (R&IS) to enhance academics’ engagement with KT. The research involved the use of on-line surveys, in-depth interviews and Action Research Groups to engage academics as participants in the process.\ud Original contribution to the field is demonstrated through outcomes of the application of a highly reflexive AR framework, including higher level reflection at each stage of several AR Cycles, culminating in the expression of theory and thinking at a meta-level of learning. AR offered an innovative approach to engaging academics in KT through shaping and implementing policy as part of participatory approaches, culminating in the R&IS. The thesis itself adopts an innovative structure to reflect the AR framework utilised.\ud Within the limitations of generalisability of an AR approach, the research findings are of value in a wider context, suggesting that:\ud • The motivation to engage in KT involves a complex mixture of intrinsic and extrinsic factors, but in this particular study it was largely influenced by intrinsic factors such as having a positive impact in society\ud • Academics in the health and education sectors may not respond positively to commercial-style descriptors of KT and econometric measures alone would not be a true reflection of KT activity levels\ud • AR can be an effective approach to support management-led interventions and change management around a specific objective\ud • Rewards and incentives could play an effective part in management initiatives to engage academics in KT.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Abreu, M. and Grinevich, V. (2013). The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK; widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities. Research Policy, 42, 408-422.
    • Abreu, M., Grinevich, V., Hughes, A. and Kitson, M. (2009). Knowledge Exchange between Academics and the Business, Public and Third Sectors. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
    • Alderfer, C. (1969). An empirical test of new theory of human need. Organizational Behavior Human Performance, 4(1), 142-75.
    • Argyris, C. (1993). Knowledge for Action. San Francisco. Jossey-Bass.
    • Argyris, C. (2003). 'Actionable knowledge', in Tsoukas, T and Knudsen, C. (Eds). The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Theory. Oxford University Press, pp.423-52.
    • Arianna, M., Martin, M., and von Tunzelmann, N. (2008). Becoming an entrepreneurial University? A case study of knowledge exchange relationships and faculty attitudes in a medium sized, research-orientated University. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(3), 259-84.
    • Armstrong, M and Brown, D. (2006). Strategic Reward: Making it happen. London. Kogan Page.
    • Armstrong, M. (2012). Handbook of Reward Management Practice: Improving performance through reward. 4th edn. London. Kogan Page.
    • Armstrong, M. and Brown, D. (2009). Strategic Reward: Implementing more effective rewards management. London. Kogan Page.
    • Askey, H. and Knight, P. (1999). Interviewing for Social Scientists. Sage. London.
    • Atkinson, P. and Silverman, D. (1997). Kundera's immortality: The interview society and the invention of the self. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(3), 304-25.
    • Bohner, G. (2001). Attitudes, pp.239-282. In Hewstone, M. and Stroebe, W. (Eds), Introduction to Social Psychology. 3rd edn. Blackwell. Oxford.
    • Booto Ekionea, J. and Fillion, G. (2011). Knowledge Management Capabilities Consensus: Evidence from a Delphi Study. Academy of Information and Management Sciences Journal, 14(1), 25-51.
    • Borman, W. and Motowildo, S. (1993). Expanding the criteria domain to include elements of contextual performance in Schmitt, N. and Borman, W. (Eds). Personnel selection in organizations. San Francisco. Jossey-Bass.
    • Bratton, J. (2007). Work and Organizational Behaviour. Palgrave Macmillan. UK.
    • Braunerheljm, P. (2007). Academic entrepreneurship: Social norms, University culture and policies. Science & Public Policy, 34(9), 619-31.
    • Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., and Montobbio, F. (2005). From publishing to patenting: Do productive scientists turn into academic inventors? Revue d'Economie Industrielle, 110, 75-102.
    • Brown, A. (1998). Organisational Culture. 2nd edn. Financial Times Pitman Publishing. UK.
    • Brown, D. (2001). The Future of Reward: Executive briefing. CIPD. London.
    • Brown, S. R. (1996). Q Methodology and qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 4, 561-67.
    • Brydon-Miller, M., Greenwood, D. and Maguire, P. (2003). Why action research? Action Research, 1(1), 9-28.
    • Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods. 4th edn. Oxford University Press. UK.
    • Buchanan, D and Huczynski, A. (2010). Organizational Behaviour. 7th edn. Pearson Education Ltd. UK.
    • Buelens, M., Van den Broeck, H., Vanderheyden, K., Kreitner, R. and Kinicki, A. (2006).
    • Organisational Behaviour, 3rd edn. McGraw Education. UK.
    • Burns, D. (2010, reprint). Systemic Action Research: A strategy for whole system change. Policy Press. University of Bristol.UK.
    • Burrell, G. and Morgan, G. (1979). Social paradigms and organizational analysis; Elements of the sociology of corporate life. chaps 1-3. Heinemann. London.
    • Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1992). Professional Development in Higher Education: A theoretical framework for AR. London. Kogan Page.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article