Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Kendall, L.; Sloper, P.; Lewin, R.; Parsons, J.M. (2003)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Background and purpose: There is little documented evidence of young people with congenital cardiac disease being consulted as to what help, if any, they really need in relation to their condition. Most research concentrates on the medical aspects of the condition. There are studies of psychological and social functioning, but few have directly sought the opinions of the young people. More recent research has indicated a need for health professionals to develop services to meet both psychosocial and physical needs of young people with congenital cardiac disease. The findings of the recent Kennedy Report support this need. The purpose of this study was to explore the views of young people with a range of congenital cardiac conditions, on what would help them better deal with their condition, and when and how help might be provided. Methods: This was a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. We interviewed 16 young people in their own home. Interviews were tape-recorded and transcribed. Analysis was conducted using the "Framework" method. Results: Whilst most of the young people interviewed actively manage their condition, they think more support from others would be beneficial. Issues of activity and communication were cited most often as areas requiring more understanding from people they interact with, for example teachers and peers. The discussion focuses on how health professionals might change or develop their practice to help young people better cope with their condition. Conclusions: Most of the young people interviewed in this study had developed their own strategies for coping with their condition. Although this is a small study, the young people provided important suggestions as to how health professionals could better develop current services.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Bowyer JJ, Busst CM, Till JA, Lincoln C, Shinebourne EA. Exercise ability after Mustard's operation. Arch Dis Child 1990; 65: 865-870.
    • 2. Meijboom F, Szatmari A, Deckers JW, et al. Cardiac status and health related quality of life in the long term after surgical repair of tetralogy of fallot in infancy and childhood. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 110: 883-891.
    • 3. Fredriksen P, Chen A, Veldtman G, Hechter S, Therrien J, Webb G. Exercise capacity in adult patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Heart 2001; 85: 191-195.
    • 4. Kramer HH, Awiszus D, Sterzel U, van Halteren A, Classen R. Development of personality and intelligence in children with congenital heart disease. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1989; 30: 299-308.
    • 5. Utens EMJW, Verhulst FC, Meijboom FJ, et al. Behavioural and emotional problems in children and adolescents with congenital heart disease. Psychol Med 1993; 23: 415-424.
    • 6. Casey FA, Sykes DH, Craig BG, Power R. Behavioural adjustment of children with surgically palliated complex congenital heart disease. J Pediatr Psychol 1996; 21: 335-352.
    • 7. Linde LM, Rasof B, Dunn OJ. Attitudinal factors in congenital heart disease. Pediatrics 1966; 38: 92-101.
    • 8. Wright M, Jarvis S, Wannamaker E. Congenital heart disease: Functional abilities in young adults. Archives Phys Med Rehabil 1985; 66: 289-293.
    • 9. Utens EM, Bieman HJ, Verhulst FC, Meijboom FJ, Erdman RA, Hess J. Psychopathology in young adults with congenital heart disease. Follow-up results. Eur Heart J 1998; 19: 647-651.
    • 10. Goldberg B, Fripp RR, Lister G, Loke J, Nicholas JA, Tainer NS. Effect of physical training on exercise performance of children following surgical repair of congenital heart disease. Pediatrics 1981; 68: 691-699.
    • 11. Longmuir PE, Turner JA, Rowe RD, Olley PM. Post-operative exercise rehabilitation benefits children with congenital heart disease. Clin Invest Med 1985; 8: 232-238.
    • 12. Galioto FM, Tomassoni TL. Exercise rehabilitation in congenital heart disease. Progress in Pediatr Cardiol 1993; 2: 50-54.
    • 13. Calzolari A, Pastore E, Biondi G. Cardiac rehabilitation in children. Interdisciplinary approach. Minerva Pediatr 1997; 49: 559-565.
    • 14. Tomassoni TL. Role of exercise in the management of cardiovascular disease in children and youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996; 28: 406-413.
    • 15. Fredriksen P, Kahrs N, Blaasvaer S, et al. Effect of physical training in children and adolescents with congenital heart disease. Cardiol Young 2000; 10: 107-114.
    • 16. Lightfoot J, Wright S, Sloper P. Service support for children with a chronic illness or physical disability attending mainstream schools. Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, 1998.
    • 17. Tong EM, Sparacino PSA, Messias DKH, Foote D, Chesla CA, Gillis CL. Growing up with congenital heart disease: the dilemmas of adolescents and young adults. Cardiol Young 1998; 8: 303-309.
    • 18. Kendall L, Lewin RJP, Parsons JM, Veldtman GR, Quirk J, Hardman GF. Factors associated with self-perceived state of health in adolescents with congenital cardiac disease attending paediatric cardiologic clinics. Cardiol Young 2001; 11: 431-438.
    • 19. Lewin RJP, Kendall L, Sloper P. Provision of services for rehabilitation of children and adolescents with congenital cardiac disease: a survey of centres for paediatric cardiology in the United Kingdom. Cardiol Young 2002; 12: 412-414.
    • 20. Kendall L, Sloper P, Lewin RJP, Parsons JM. The views of parents concerning the planning of services for rehabilitation of families of children with congenital cardiac disease. Cardiol Young 2003; 13: 20-27.
    • 21. Hill M, Laybourn A, Borland M. Engaging with primary aged children about their emotions and well-being. Methodological considerations. Children and Society 1996; 10: 129-144.
    • 22. Finch J. The vignette technique in survey research. Sociology 1987; 21: 105-114.
    • 23. Hazel N. Elicitation techniques with young people. Social Research Update 1996; Issue 12, University of Surrey.
    • 24. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG (eds). Analysing Qualitative Data. Routledge, London, 1994, pp 173-194.
    • 25. Mays N, Pope C. Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ 1995; 311: 109-112.
    • 26. Lightfoot J, Wright S, Sloper P. Supporting pupils in mainstream school with an illness or disability: young people's views. Child Care Health Devel 1999; 25: 267-283.
    • 27. Beresford B, Sloper T. Information needs of disabled young people. Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, 2000.
    • 28. Kennedy I. The Report of the Public Inquiry into children's heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984-1995. 2001.
    • 29. Beresford B, Sloper T. The information needs of chronically ill or physically disabled children and adolescents. Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, 1999.
    • 30. Phipps S, Srivastava DK. Repressive adaptation in children with cancer: it may be better not to know. J Pediatr 1997; 130: 257-265.
    • 31. Frederickson LG. Exploring information-exchange in consultation: the patients' view of performance and outcomes. Patient Education and Counselling 1995; 25: 237-246.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article