Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Siakas, Kerstin V.; Georgiadou, Elli; Balstrup, Bo (2010)
Publisher: Emerald
Languages: English
Types: Article
Purpose – EU sponsored Lifelong Learning Projects involve a variety of experts of diverse cultural, organisational, and professional backgrounds connected together in one project with time and money constraints. The members of the consortium, often unknown to each other from the beginning, come together for a specific period of time to accomplish certain distinctive objectives. A special Knowledge Sharing strategy is needed in order to incorporate culturally diverse values, and to overcome the technical difficulties of dispersion and limited access to informal communication. This paper explores the way in which EU projects appreciate diverse cultural (national, organisational, and professional) influences on Knowledge Sharing in project-based collaboration.\ud Design/methodology/approach – This paper is based on longitudinal studies, own multicultural experiences and earlier conceptually grounded arguments regarding cultural complexities to Knowledge Sharing in project environments. The key cultural issues highlighted here were empirically tested through a survey in the context of Knowledge Sharing in several EU Lifelong learning projects. Finally, the paper discusses the implications of dealing with cultural issues in fostering good Knowledge Sharing practices within dispersed projects.\ud Findings – It is apparent that culture has a most significant influence on the Knowledge Sharing capability of time and money restricted dispersed project. Cultural awareness and the use of new Information and Communication (ICT) tools, such as WEB 2.0 are factors supporting Knowledge Sharing.\ud Research limitations/implications – This paper puts forward experiences and opinions of a number of project partners from different EU lifelong learning projects regarding their general opinions about knowledge sharing and their experiences from knowledge sharing in EU projects they have participated in. The findings are not statistically tested due to the small sample, but highlight certain issues that will be further investigated in future work.\ud Practical implications – At the project level, people and processes must be the first priority for project managers who wish to nurture a „Knowledge Sharing culture‟ in a dispersed context. At the team level, the project manager can help to create a team culture favourable to Knowledge Sharing by emphasising appropriate values and beliefs to the team members and by introducing suitable enablers for virtual communities.\ud Originality/value – Previous studies have not examined knowledge sharing in EU projects. The paper aims to help practitioners and academics, who participate in EU projects to recognise that the different EU project team members usually are dispersed in terms of geography, expertise and working methods) and to understand that diverse cultural values (national, organisational and professional) can be a competitive advantage. As a result of gaining such understanding it is expected that EU project performance will improve if diversities are handled in a right manner and in addition Web 2.0 is used as a communication and sharing platform to enable increased knowledge sharing, interactive participation and digital democracy in practice.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Ajmal, M. M., Kekäle, T. and Takala, J. (2009), “Cultural impacts on knowledge management and learning in project-based firms”, VINE: The journal of information and knowledge management systems, Vol.39, No. 4, pp. 339-352
    • Alavi, M. and Leidner, D.E. (2001), “Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 107-36.
    • Balstrup, B. (2004), Leading by Detached Involvement - Success factors enabling leadership of virtual teams, MBA Dissertation, Henley Management College, UK
    • Barab, S. A., Kling, R. and Gray, J. H. (2004), Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
    • Barachini, F. (2009). Cultural and social issues for knowledge sharing, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 98-110
    • Bettoni, M., Andenmatten, S. and Mathieu R. (2006), “Knowledge Cooperation in Online Communities: A Duality of Participation and Cultivation”, in Peter Feher (ed), Proceedings of 7th European Conference of Knowledge Management (ECKM06), 4-5 Sept., Public Academic Conferences Ltd. Reading, UK, pp. 36- 42
    • Chen, J., Sun P. Y. T. and McQueen R. J. (2010), “The impact of national cultures on structured knowledge transfer”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 228-242
    • Ciganek, A., Nicholls, E.M., and Srite, M. (2008), “Organizational Culture for Knowledge Management Systems: A Study of Corporate Users”, International Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1-16
    • Davenport, T. and Prusak, L. (1998), Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    • De Carolis, M. and Corvello, V. (2006), “Multiple Competences in Distributed Communities of Practice: The Case of a Community of Financial Advisors”, in Peter Feher (ed), Proceedings of 7th European Conference of Knowledge Management (ECKM06), 4-5 Sept., Public Academic Conferences Ltd. Reading, UK, pp. 116-125
    • Elron, E. and Vigoda-Gadot. E. (2006). “Influence and Political Processes in Cyberspace: The Case of Global Virtual Teams”, International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 295-317
    • Georgiadou, E. and Siakas, K. (2010), “KASL - II: A Dynamic Four Loop Model for Knowledge Sharing and Learning”, Software Process: Improvement and Practice (SPIP) Journal, John Wiley & Sons (Accepted)
    • Georgiadou, E. and Siakas, K. (2009a), “A Dynamic Model for Improving Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Organisations”, Industrial Stream of European Software Process Improvement (EuroSPI 2009), Alcala, Madrid, Spain, 2-4 September, pp. 3.37 - 3.47
    • Georgiadou, E. and Siakas, K. (2009b), “Collaborative projects: A bottom up approach to European Integration”, Annual Edition of the International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED 2009), Valencia, Spain, 9th - 11th of March, 2009, ISBN: 978-84-612-7578- 6, pp. 5091-5099
    • Grace, T.P.L. (2009), “Wikis as a knowledge management tool”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 64-74
    • Holsapple C. W. (2009), “A new map for knowledge dissemination channels”. Communication of the ACM, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 117-125
    • Holsapple, C. W (2005), “The inseparability of modern knowledge management and computer based technology”, in Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 42-52
    • Holste, J. S., Fields, D. (2010). “Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 128-140
    • Hofstede, G. (2001), “National culture and organizational practices”, in Ashkanasy, N. (Eds), Handbook on Organizational Culture and Climate, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
    • Kasvi, J. J., Vartianinen, M. and Hailikar, M. (2003), “Managing knowledge and knowledge competencies in project organizations”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 21 No. 8, pp. 571-582
    • Kelman, H.C. (1958), “Compliance, identification and internalization: three processes of attitude change”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 51-60
    • Love, P., Fong, P. S. W. and Irani, Z., (2005), Management of Knowledge in Project Environments. Elsevier Ltd.
    • Magier-Watanabe, R. and Senoo, D. (2010), “Shaping knowledge management: organizational and national culture”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 214-227
    • O‟Reilly T. (2005), “What Is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software”, available at http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html, accessed 3.4.2010
    • Paroutis, S. and Saleh, A. A. (2009), “Determinants of knowledge sharing using Web 2.0 technologies”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 52-63
    • Pascu, C. Osimo, D., Turlea, G., Ulbrich, M., Punie, Y. and Burgelman J-C. (2008), “Social computing: implication for the EU innovation landscape”, ISSN 1463-6689, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, DOI 10.1108/14636680810856017, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 37-52
    • Schein, E. H. (1985), “How Culture Forms, Develops and Changes” in R. H. Kilmann & M. J. Saxton, In R. Serpa (eds.): Gaining control of the Corporate Culture, San Francisco, USA: Jossey Bass
    • Schwen, T. M. and Hara, N. (2003), “Community of Practice. A Metaphor for Online Design?” The Information Society, 19, pp. 257-270.
    • Scarso, E., Bolisani, E. and Salvador L. (2009), “A systematic framework for analyzing the critical success factors of communities of practice”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 13 No. 6, pp. 431-447
    • Siakas, K. and Georgiadou, E. (2008), “Sharing in Virtual and Networked Organisations in Different Organisational and National Cultures”, eds. Ettore Bolisani, Building the Knowledge Society on the Internet, Idea Publishing, ISBN: 978-1-59904-816-1, Part 1, Chapter 3, pp.45-64
    • Siakas, K. and Siakas, E. (2008), “The need for trust relationships to enable successful virtual team collaboration and software outsourcing”, The International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management special issue on Human Aspects of Information Technology Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd., Vol. 8, No.1 pp.59 - 75
    • Siakas, K. and Georgiadou, E. (2006), “Knowledge Sharing: Cultural Dynamics”, in Peter Feher (ed), Proceedings of 7th European Conference of Knowledge Management (ECKM06), 4-5 Sept., Public Academic Conferences Ltd. Reading, UK, ISBN 978-1-905305-26-5 Book, pp. 505-513
    • Stringer, E. T. (2007), Action Research: A handbook for practitioners 3e, Newbury Park, Ca.: Sage.
    • Usoro, A. and Kuofie, M.H.S., (2006), “Conceptualization of Cultural Dimensions as a Major Influence on Knowledge Management”, International Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 16-25
    • Wei, L. (2010), “Virtual knowledge sharing in a cross/cultural context”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 38/50
    • Wei, J., Stankosky, M., Calabrese, F., and Lu, L., (2008), “A framework for studying the impact of national culture on knowledge sharing motivation in virtual teams”, VINE: The journal of information and knowledge management systems, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 221-231
    • Zakaria, N., Amelinckx, A. and Wilemon, D. (2004), “Working together apart? Building a knowledge-sharing culture for global virtual teams”, Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 15-29.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article