LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Stafford, Richard; Goodenough, Anne E; Davies, Mark S (2010)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: LB2300, QH301
Identifiers:doi:10.3108/beej.15.1
Designing manipulative ecological experiments is a complex and time-consuming process\ud that is problematic to teach in traditional undergraduate classes. This study investigates\ud the effectiveness of using a computer simulation — the Virtual Rocky Shore (VRS) — to\ud facilitate rapid, student-centred learning of experimental design. We gave a series of tests\ud to biology undergraduates to determine how well experimental design and data analysis\ud was understood: 1) before any teaching sessions on this topic; 2) after theory sessions on\ud experimental design; and 3) after an additional practical session using the VRS. Due to\ud poor weather, sample sizes were small with a total of 12 students participating in all three\ud sessions. Nevertheless, marks increased significantly between the initial and final tests (1\ud and 3). The variability of marks during test 2 was also significantly higher than for the other\ud two tests. Thus some students learned experimental design effectively from the theory\ud sessions alone, while others only understood the process after the experiential learning\ud component of the VRS. Feedback from students on the process was mainly positive,\ud although some students found the VRS too abstract, indicating that the use of digital learning\ud resources may need to be supported by real experience in the field or laboratory.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • D'Avanzo, C. (1996) Three ways to teach labs by inquiry: guide,dopen-ended, and teacher collaborative. ESA Bulletin, 77, 92-93
    • Davies, M.S., Knowles, A.J., Edmondston, P. and Hutchinson, N. (1997) The use of a commercial insect-trapping compound to maintain grazer densities on rocky shorTersa.nsactions of the natural history society of Northumbria, 57, 185-190
    • Easterling, R.G. (2004) Teaching Experimental Design. The American Statistician, 58, 244-252 doi:10.1198/000313004X1477
    • Entwistle, N. (2009) Teaching for Understanding at University: Deep Approaches and Distinctive Ways of Thinking. Palgrave Macmillan
    • Facer, K. (2003) Computer games and learning: Why do we think it's worth talking about computer games and learning in the same breath? NESTA Futurelab
    • Finn, H., Maxwell, M. and Calver, M. (2002) Why does experimeantiton matter in teaching ecology? Journal of Biological Education, 36, 158-164
    • Fisher, R.A. (1926) The arrangement of ield experimentsJ.ournal of the Ministry of Agriculture, 33, 503-513
    • Garrity, S.D. (1984) Some adaptations of gastropods to physical stress on a tropical rocky shore. Ecology, 65, 559-574 doi:10.2307/1941418
    • Hiebert, S.M. (2007) Teaching simple experimental design to undergraduates: do your students understand the basics?Advances in Physiological Education, 31, 82-92 doi:10.1152/advan.00033.2006
    • Ju, W. Oehlberg, L. and Leifer, L. (2004) Project-based learning for experimental design research. In Proceedings of the International Engineering and Product Design Education Conference, 2004 Delft, The Netherlands. http://best.berkeley.edu/~lora/Publications/IEPDE04-xPBL.pdf (accessed 28 January 2010)
    • Kolb, D.A., Boyatzis, R.E. and Mainemelis, C. (2000) Experienltieaalrning theory: previous research and new directions. In Perspectives on cognitive, learning, and thinking styles eds Sternberg, R.J. and Zhang, L.F. pp 227-247. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.
    • Underwood, A.J. and Denley, E.J. (1984) Paradigms, explanations and generalisations in models for the structure of intertidal communities on rocky shores. In Ecological Communities, Conceptual Issues and the Evidence, eds Strong, D.R., Simberloff, D., Abele, L.G. and Thistle, A.B. pp. 151- 180, Cambridge, MA. Princetown University Press
    • Williams, G.A. (1994) Grazing by high shore littorinids on aermatoedly exposed tropical rocky shore. In The Malacofauna of Hong Kong and Southern China III, ed Morton, B. pp. 379-389, Hong Kong University Press
    • Willmott, C. (2005) What Makes the Best Learning ExperienceB?ioscience Education 5-c1 available at www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol5/beej-5-c1.aspx (accessed 28th January 2010)
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article