OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Wyatt, Tanya; Brisman, Avi (2017)
Publisher: Springer Nature
Journal: Critical Criminology
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Law, Sociology and Political Science, L900
Since its inception, green criminology has highlighted, examined and analysed environmental degradation and destruction. The ‘theft of nature’ is both an example and a driver of illegal and ‘lawful but awful’ acts and omissions that degrade the environment. Even though this theft is widespread and sometimes well known, it persists because powerful actors put forward an influential narrative of denial that obstructs interventions. This paper explores the role of denial in two thefts of nature—biopiracy and climate change—and compares and contrasts the manifestations of denial that contribute to their continuation. We consider the ‘appeal to higher loyalties’ (economic interests over environmental concerns), and discuss the implications if such denial goes unchallenged and remains the central narrative.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Achenbach, J. (2015). The age of disbelief. National Geographic, 227, 30-47.
    • Agnew, R. (2012). It's the end of the world as we know it: The advance of climate change from a criminological perspective. In R. White (Ed.), Climate change from a criminological perspective (pp. 13-25). London: Springer.
    • Barnett, A. (2006). The new piracy: how the west ''steals'' Africa's plants. Swiss and British firms are accused of using the scientific properties of plants from the developing world to make huge profits while giving nothing to the people there. The Observer, 27 August.
    • Berman, R. (2014). The angry GOP backlash to Obama's historic climate accord. The Atlantic, 12 November. Accessed 15 June 2016.
    • Booker, C. (2015). The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever. The Telegraph, 7 February.
    • Brisman, A. (2012). The cultural silence of climate change contrarianism. In R. White (Ed.), Climate change from a criminological perspective (pp. 41-70). London: Springer.
    • Brisman, A. (2013). Not a bedtime story: Climate change, neoliberalism, and the future of the Arctic. Michigan State International Law Review, 22(1), 241-289.
    • Brisman, A. (2015). ''Multicolored'' green criminology and climate change's achromatopsia. Contemporary Justice Review, 18(2), 178-196.
    • Brisman, A., & South, N. (2015). New ''folk devils'', denials and climate change: Applying the work of Stanley Cohen to green criminology and environmental harm'. Critical Criminology, 23(4), 449-460.
    • Carvahlo, A. (2007). Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: Re-reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 16(2), 223-243.
    • Chen, J. (2006). There is no such thing as biopiracy… It's a good thing too. McGeorge Law Review, 37, 1-32.
    • Cohen, A. K. (1955). Delinquent boys: The culture of the gang. New York: Free Press.
    • Cohen, S. (2001). States of denial: Knowing about atrocities and suffering. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    • Crosby, A. (1993). Ecological imperialism: The biological expansion of Europe, 900-1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Diethelm, P., & McKee, M. (2009). Denialism: What is it and how should scientists respond? European Journal of Public Health, 19(1), 2-4.
    • Drahos, P. (2000). Indigenous knowledge, intellectual property and biopiracy: Is a global biocollecting society the answer? European Intellectual Property Review, 22(6), 245-250.
    • Drahos, P. (2004). Towards an international framework for the protection of traditional group knowledge and practice. In UNCTAD-commonwealth secretariat workshop on elements of national sui generis systems for the preservation, protection and promotion of traditional knowledge, innovations and practices and options for an international framework. Geneva, Switzerland.
    • Evans, R. (2014). Global warming not stopped, will go on for centuries: WMO. Reuters, 24 March.
    • Farrell, P. B. (2014). Climate science is a hoax: Big oil, GOP, God say so. MarketWatch, 22 May.
    • Freudenburg, W. R. (2000). Social constructions and social constrictions: Toward analyzing the social construction of ''the naturalized'' as well as ''the natural''. In G. Spaargen, A. Mol, & F. H. Buttel (Eds.), Environment and global modernity (pp. 103-119). London: Sage.
    • Friedman, T. L. (2014). The world is fast. The New York Times, 5 November, A19.
    • Goldenberg, S. (2013a). How Donors Trust distributed millions to anti-climate groups. The Guardian, 14 February. Accessed 15 June 2016.
    • Goldenberg, S. (2013b). Secret funding helped build vast network of climate denial thinktanks. The Guardian, 14 February. Accessed 15 June 2016.
    • Goyes, D. R., & South, N. (2016). Land-grabs, biopiracy and the inversion of justice in Colombia. British Journal of Criminology, 56(3), 558-577.
    • Hanstad, T. & Prosterman, R. (2014). How the poor get washed away. The New York Times. 15 January, A23.
    • Heald, P. J. (2003). Rhetoric of biopiracy. Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law, 11, 519-546.
    • Hirschman, A. (1991). The rhetoric of reaction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    • Kaufman, L. (2009). Dissenter on warming expands his campaign. The New York Times, 10 April, A13.
    • Knight, G., & Greenberg, J. (2011). Talk of the enemy: Adversarial framing and climate change discourse. Social Movement Studies, 10(4), 323-340.
    • Kramer, R., & Michalowski, R. (2012). Is global warming a state-corporate crime? In R. White (Ed.), Climate change from a criminological perspective (pp. 71-88). New York: Springer.
    • Krugman, P. (2009). Betraying the planet. The New York Times, 28 June, A21.
    • Krugman, P. (2010). Building a green economy. The New York Times Magazine, 11 April, MM34.
    • Krugman, P. (2014). Crazy climate economics. The New York Times, 12 May, A23.
    • Krugman, P. (2015). Things to celebrate. The New York Times, 25 December, A25.
    • Levy, D. L., & Egan, D. (2003). A neo-Gramscian approach to corporate political strategy: Conflict and accommodation in the climate change negotiations. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4), 803-829.
    • Liang, B. (2011). Global governance: Promoting biodiversity and protecting indigenous communities against biopiracy. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 17(3), 248-253.
    • McClanahan, B., & Brisman, A. (2015). Climate change and peacemaking criminology. Critical Criminology, 23(4), 417-431.
    • McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2000). Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement's counter-claims. Social Problems, 47(4), 499-522.
    • Mgbeoji, I. (2006). Global biopiracy: Patents, plants and indigenous knowledge. Vancouver: UBC Press.
    • Nash, R. (2001). Who benefits from biopiracy? Phytochemistry, 56(5), 403-405.
    • Norgaard, K. (2006a). ''People want to protect themselves a little bit'': Emotions, denial and social movement nonparticipation. Sociological Inquiry, 76(3), 372-396.
    • Norgaard, K. (2006b). We don't really want to know. Organisation and Environment, 19(3), 347-370.
    • Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2008). Challenging knowledge: How climate science became a victim of the cold war. In R. Proctor & L. Schiebinger (Eds.), Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance (pp. 55-89). Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
    • Peoples, S. (2013). Obama climate change push draws industry criticism. Associated Press, 4 July. http:// Accessed 15 June 2016.
    • Pew Research Center. (2014). Thirteen years of the public's top priorities. interactive/top-priorities/. Accessed 15 June 2016.
    • Pittock, A. B. (2009). Climate change: The science, impacts and solutions. Clayton: CSIRO Publishing.
    • Pretty, J. (2013). The consumption of a finite planet: Well-being, convergence, divergence and the nascent green economy. Environmental and Resource Economics, 55(4), 475-499.
    • Proctor, R. N. (2008). Agnotology: A missing term to describe the cultural production of ignorance (and its study). In R. Proctor & L. Schiebinger (Eds.), Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance (pp. 1-33). Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
    • Reid, J. (2010). Biopiracy: The struggle for traditional knowledge rights. American Indian Law Review, 34, 77-98.
    • Revkin, A. C. (2008). Skeptics on human climate impact seize on cold spell. The New York Times, 2 March, 14.
    • Ridley, M. (2013). Why climate change is good for the world. The Spectator, 19 October. http://www. Accessed 15 June 2016.
    • Roberts, D. (2015). College students are making global warming a moral issue. Here's why that scares people. Vox, 29 April. Accessed 15 June 2016.
    • Robinson, D. (2010). Locating biopiracy: Geographically and culturally situated knowledges. Environment and Planning, 42, 38-56.
    • Scully, D., & Marolla, J. (1984). Convicted rapists' vocabulary of motive: Excuses and justifications. Social Problems, 31, 530-544.
    • Shiva, V. (2001). Protect or plunder? Understanding intellectual property rights. London: Zed Books.
    • Singer, M. (2015). Climate change denial: The organized creation and emotional embrace of unsupported science claims. Anthropology News, 56(1-2), 10.
    • Smith, N., & Leiserowitz, A. (2012). The rise of global warming skepticism: Exploring affective image associations in the united states over time. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 1021-1032.
    • Soros, G. (1997). The capitalist threat. Atlantic Monthly, February, 45-58.
    • South, N. (2007). The ''corporate colonisation of nature'': Bio-prospecting, bio-piracy and the development of green criminology. In P. Bierne & N. South (Eds.), Issues in green criminology: Confronting harms against environments, humanity and other animals (pp. 230-247). London: Willan.
    • South, N., & Brisman, A. (Eds.). (2013). Routledge international handbook of green criminology. London: Routledge.
    • Specter, M. (2009). Denialism: How irrational thinking hinders scientific progress, harms the planet and threatens our lives. London: Penguin Press.
    • Sykes, G., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664-670.
    • (2013). Are you ready for even more Katrinas and Sandys? Yahoo!News, 11 June. http:// Accessed 15 June 2016.
    • US Department of the Interior. (2009). Benefits-sharing in the National Parks. Environmental impact statement: What is bioprospecting?. Accessed 15 June 2016.
    • van der Linden, S., Maibach, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2015). Improving public engagement with climate change: Five ''best practice'' insights from psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 758-763.
    • Washington, H., & Cook, J. (2011). Climate change denial: Heads in the sand. London: Earthscan.
    • West, J. (2014). Jeb Bush on climate change: ''I'm a skeptic.'' Mother Jones, 16 December. http://www. Accessed 15 June 2016.
    • White, R. (2008). Crimes against nature: Environmental criminology and ecological justice. London: Willan.
    • White, R. (2013). Environmental harm: An eco-justice perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.
    • White, R., & Heckenberg, D. (2014). Green criminology: An introduction to the study of environmental harm. London: Routledge.
    • White, R. & Kramer, R. (2015). Critical criminology and the struggle against climate change ecocide. Critical Criminology. 23/4 November: 383-399.
    • Wyatt, T. (2012). Biopiracy. In M. Beare (Ed.), Encyclopedia of transnational crime and justice (pp. 29-30). London: Sage.
    • Wyatt, T. (2014). Invisible pillaging: The hidden harm of corporate biopiracy. In P. Davies, P. Francis, & T. Wyatt (Eds.), Invisible crimes and social harms (pp. 161-177). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok