Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Borjesson, Kristina (2009)
Languages: English
Types: Unknown

Sustainability is always about regard to the environment: an intelligent use of resources and not returning to nature what it cannot degrade without long-term damage. Politics, business and thus research have been predominantly concerned with the direct impact on the environment of the diverse human activities in our society. There is of course awareness about all the indirect effects caused by these activities but as these effects are more complicated to identify and calculate, it could reasonably be suggested that these have not got the same attention and hence have not been thoroughly explored. Important resources are required for the production of objects, which subsequently turn out neither to meet humans’ needs nor to fulfil their desires. This issue involves not just the misuse of resources but also the addition to waste problems. Needs and desires are not unrelated to material and function but reach mostly beyond the physicality of the object as argued by Krippendorf (2006), among others. Timelessness is unrelated to physicality and is most likely the ultimate example of sustaining. However, this phenomenon does not easily allow interpretation as it is basically philosophical, which also would complicate its transition into other domains.

The deconstruction of timelessness in an earlier work (Borjesson, 2006) resulted in the phenomenon being conceptualised as affective sustainability. Four notions were identified as mainly informing timelessness: time, tradition, aesthetics and perception. When subsequently studied in several disciplines, these notions produced indicators on how to understand better what makes objects retain their significance in a changing human context. These indicators are not to be categorised as a set of tools or even less as a model to be applied in the design process: they are directional rather than normative. Moreover, they are best understood as support and inspiration to develop design thinking and have been the subject for further analysis as part of continued research. This has increased the clarity of the directions not only in relation to design thinking but also where to continue research.

Sustainability, Human ways of living, Human ways of being, Lived and Learned experience, Emotion, Affect, Feeling, Cognition.

  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Desmet, P. & Hekkert, P. (2007) Framework of Product experience.
    • International Journal of Design, 1(1), 2007, 57-66.
    • Desmet, P., Hekkert, P. & Jacobs, J. (2000) When a car makes you smile: Development and application of an instrument to measure product emotions.
    • In S.J. Hoch & R.J. Meyer (ed) Advances in Consumer Research, 19, 111-117.
    • Dunn, K. (2004) Northern exposure - Company Town. Blueprint, 216, 49-51.
    • Fulton Suri, J. (2005) Thoughtless Acts. San Francisco: Chronicle Books.
    • Jordan, P.W. (2000) Designing Pleasurable Products. London: Taylor & Francis.
    • Gerdenryd, H. (1998) How Designers Work. Making Sense of Authentic Cognitive Activities. Lund University Cognitive Studies, 75. Lund, Sweden: Lund University.
    • Gärdenfors, P. (2006) Den meningssökande människan. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
    • Hill, G. (2002) Designing Waste. In: Birkeland, J. ed. For Sustainability: a sourcebook of integrated eco-logical solutions. London: Earthscan.
    • Krippendorf, K. (2006) The Semantic Turn. Boca Raton, Fl: Taylor & Francis.
    • Kwinter, S. (2001) Architectures of Time. Toward a Theory of the Event in Modernist Culture. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press Lave, J. (1988) Cognition in Practice: Mind Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life. Cambridge: University Press.
    • Love, T. (2002) Beyond Emotions in Designing and Design: Epistemological and Practical Issues. < Accessed 23 January 2008 from: http://www.love.com.au Maslow, A H. (1954/1970) Motivation and Personality. 2nd ed. New York: Harper & Row, 1970.
    • McDonough, W. & Braungart, M. (2002) Cradle to Cradle. Remaking the Way We Make Things. New York: North Point Press.
    • Menke, C. (1998) Modernity, subjectivity and aesthetic reflection. In: Osborne, P. (2000) ed. From an Aesthetic Point of View. Philosophy, Art and the Senses.
    • London: Serpent's Tail Mollerup, P. (2007) Design att leva med. Stockholm: Carlssons.
    • Mugge, R. (2007) Product Attachment. PhD thesis. Delft University of Technology.
    • Norman, D.A. (2004) Emotional Design. Why we love (or hate) everyday things.
    • Oakley, T. (2007) Attention and Semiotics. Cognitive Semiotics, Fall 2007, 25-45.
    • Pöppel, e. (2007) A Toolbox for Thinking - an essay. Cognitive Semiotics, Fall 2007, 8-24.
    • Ramachandran, V. (2003) The Emerging Mind. London: Profile Books.
    • Rittel H. & Webber M. (1973) Dilemmas in General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences. 4, 155-169.
    • Schifferstein, H.N.J., Mugge, R. & Hekkert, P. (2004). Designing consumerproduct attachment. In D McDonagh, P. Hekkert, J. Van Erp & D. Gyi (ed.) Design and Emotion: The experience of everyday things. London: Taylor & Francis.
    • Sternberg, R.J. (1996) Cognitive Psychology. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    • Ticineto Clough, P. & Halley, J. (2007) The Affective Turn. Theorizing the Social.
    • Vihma, S. (2008) Design as Language - a misconception? Proceedings from The 7th Nordcode Seminar. Paradoxes within Design Research - Mechanisms and Contradictions. Lund 28-30 May, 2008. Working paper.
    • Whitfield, T. W. A. (2007) Feelings in Design - a neorevolutionary perspective on process and knowledge. The Design Journal, 10 (3), 3-13.
    • Wilson, T.D. (2002) Strangers to Ourselves. Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press/Harvard University Press.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article