OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Campbell, Jackie; Pyer, Michelle; Rogers, Stephen; Walter, David; Reddy, Raja (2014)
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: RC0254, RA0421, RC705
BACKGROUND:\ud UK clinical guidance for lung cancer (NICE 141) includes pathways for chest X-rays (CXRs). Many patients fulfilling the criteria do not receive one, either because they do not consult their doctor or because their doctor does not refer them. The town of Corby, UK, has particularly high incidence and mortality rates for lung cancer and was chosen as a pilot site for a new, patient-requested X-ray service.\ud METHODS:\ud The number of community-initiated CXRs were compared before and after the introduction of the service and between similar geographical areas. Clinical data and patient questionnaires were analysed for those attending the service.\ud RESULTS:\ud There was a 63% increase in the total number of community-initiated CXRs in Corby for the year following the introduction of the service, compared with the year before. This was statistically greater than in surrounding geographical areas. Corby General Practitioners also requested 47% more CXRs than in the previous year.\ud CONCLUSIONS:\ud The implementation of the service was associated with a significant increase in the numbers of clinically indicated CXRs in an area of high lung cancer incidence and mortality. The service attracted a clinically appropriate population. The numbers of cancers detected were in line with statistical expectations.\ud
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1 The Information Centre. National Lung Cancer Audit: key findings about the quality of care for people with Lung Cancer in England incorporating headline and completeness data from Wales. Leeds: The Information Centre, NCASP, 2006.
    • 2 Berrino F, De Angelis R, Sant M et al. Survival for eight major cancers and all cancers combined for European adults diagnosed in 1995-99: results of the EUROCARE-4 study. The Lancet Oncology 2007;8(9):773 - 83.
    • 3 Holmberg L, Sandin F, Bray F et al. National comparisons of lung cancer survival in England, Norway and Sweden 2001 - 2004: differences occur early in follow-up. Thorax 2010;65:436 - 44.
    • 4 Imperatori A, Harrison R, Leitch D et al. Lung cancer in Teesside (UK) and Varese (Italy): a comparison of management and survival. Thorax 2006;61(3):232 - 9.
    • 5 6 Mo¬®ller M, Shack L, Moran A. Lung Cancer in the North West - Informing decisions to improve health. Liverpool: North West Cancer Intelligence Service (NWCIS), 2008.
    • UK Recovery Foundation. UK Cancer Statistics. 2011 [updated 2011; cited 10 June 2013].
    • 7 Cancer Research UK. Lung Cancer - UK Incidence Statistics. 2011 [updated 2011; cited 10 June 2013]. http://info.cancerresearchuk. org/cancerstats/types/lung/incidence/ (10 June 2013, date last accessed).
    • 8 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Lung cancer : The diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. National Collaborating Centre for Cancer, Cardiff, 2011. p. 42.
    • 9 Allgar VL, Neal RD. Delays in the diagnosis of six cancers: analysis of data from the National Survey of NHS Patients: cancer. Br J Cancer 2005;92:1959 - 70.
    • 10 Bjerager MD, Palshof T, Dahl R et al. Delay in diagnosis of lung cancer in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2006;56:863 - 8.
    • 11 Bellamy V, Langley J. Lung Cancer in Corby. East Midlands Public Health Observatory, 2011.
    • 12 Public Health England. Health Profiles 2012. [cited 10 June 2013].
    • 13 Cheyne L, Foster C, Lovatt V et al. Improved lung cancer survival and reduced emergency diagnoses resulting from an early diagnosis campaign in leeds 2011. Thorax 2012;67(Suppl 2): A44 - A5.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok