Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Wood, Jane L.; Viki, G. Tendayi (2004)
Publisher: Willan Publishing
Languages: English
Types: Part of book or chapter of book
Subjects: BF
Findings concerning people’s attitudes toward crime and punishment are often at odds, perhaps influenced by various factors that are not captured in the original research. The authors focus on some of the factors that have a bearing on the attitudes people express in order to gauge a more accurate assessment of public opinion. Historically, attitudes and policy approaches toward criminal justice have fluctuated based on the economic conditions of society. At times of high unemployment, public opinion on criminal justice tends to swing toward the more punitive so that conditions within prison are more austere than the living conditions of the poorest members of society. The influence of gender in attitudes toward crime and punishment is questioned as some studies have found gender differences while others have not. Racial differences in attitudes toward crime and punishment are similarly ambiguous. As such, categorizing the public’s attitudes toward crime and punishment according to demographic categories remains problematic as the influence of some demographics appear to be indirect. Similarly contrasting research is reviewed concerning the role that fear of crime plays in shaping public attitudes toward criminal justice practices. Some inconsistencies in research findings may be the result of differing methodologies. The role of victimization on public attitudes is reviewed; findings have failed to find a link between victimization and attitudes of increased punitiveness toward offenders. The link between individual ideological beliefs and attitudes toward crime and punishment has been probed by researchers who have identified some personal beliefs that influence attitudes, such as degree of religiosity and the belief in a just world. The influence of the type of offense on attitudes of punitiveness have been examined and has illustrated the more offenses an offender has committed, the more punitive the attitude toward the offender. Finally, the authors show that the attitudes of the public toward punitive punishments may be based on inaccurate knowledge of punitive sanctions. This review has established that the public’s attitudes toward crime and punishment are contextual and thus difficult to assess. Sweeping statements about the public’s desire for more punitive punishment are based on inaccurate measurements. Notes, references
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Herrington, V. and Millie, A. (2006) `Applying reassurance Policing: Is it Policing & Society, 16:2, pp. 146-163 Hobolt, S.B. and Klemmemsen, R. ((2005) `Responsive Government? Public opinion and Government policy prefer Political Studies, 53, pp. 379-402.
    • Home Office (2001) `Making Punishments Work. Report of a Review of the Sentencing Framework for England and Wales. Lobdon. Home Office.
    • Hough, M. (2003) `Modernisation and public opinion: some criminal justice Contemporary Politics, 9, pp.143-55.
    • Hough, M and Park, A. (2002) `How malleable are attitudes to crime and M.Hough, Changing Attitudes to Punishment: Public opinion, crime and justice (Willan Publishing), pp. 163-183.
    • King M. 1995. The James Bulger murder trial: moral dilemmas and social solutions. International Journal of Children's Rights 3: pp. 167-187.
    • Sparks, R. 'The media and penal politics, Review Essay', Punishment & Society, 2:1, pp. 98-105 Stimson, J.A., MacKuen, M.B. and Erikson, R.S. (1995) `Dynamic American Journal of Political Science, 89, pp. 543-65.
    • Thorpe, K. and Wood, M. (2004 A.Walker (Eds), Crime in England and Wales 2002/2003: Supplementary Volume 2: Crime and Disorder and the Criminal Justice System Public Attitudes and Perceptions, Home Office Statistical Bulletin 02/04, (London:Home Office).
    • Law & Social Change, 27 pp.109-119.
    • Walker, N. (1985) `Sentencing: Theory, Law and Practice (London: Butterworth and Co.) Public Opinion Quarterly, 59, pp.
    • Yankelovich, D. (1991) Coming to Public Judgement: Making Democracy Work in a Complex World (Syracuse University Press).
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article