Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
O'Connor, T.P. (2000)
Publisher: Oxbow Books
Languages: English
Types: Part of book or chapter of book
Organic refuse, such as food and butchery waste, was commonly deposited in dumps andpits in medieval towns throughout northern Europe. These deposits of refuse attracted and supponed a diverse communily of scavengers and their predators. The organic refuse can be seen as a source of energy that maintained food-webs of donor-controlled populations, giving them potentially high population densities, foundercontrolled response to perturbation, and perhaps a strongly stochastic element in determining which species became dominant at any particular location. The red kite is an example of a scavenger which was strongly dependent on refuse deposition, and it is argued that cats in medieval towns may have lived largely as predators within the refuse-supported food-webs.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Atkinson, W. D. and Shorrocks, B. 1981. Competilion on a divided and ephemeral resource: a simulation model. Journal of Animal Ecology 50, 461-71.
    • Began, M., Harper, J. L. and Townsend, C. R. 1990. Ecology. individuals, populations and cornmuniries. (2nd ed.) Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Bond. J. and O'Connor. T. P. 1998. Bonesfrom medieval deposirs a1 16-22 Coppergate and orher sires in York. (Archaeology of York 1515). York: Council for British Archaeolog-~y.
    • Edlin. H. L 1952. The chonxing wild-lfe ofBrirnin. London: Batsford.
    • E n . W 1966. Ecological principles in the urbanization of birds. Osrrich, Supplement 6. 366-363.
    • Galushin, V. M. 1971. A huge urban population of birds of prey in Delhi. India. (Preliminary note), Ibis 113. 522.
    • Gurney, J. H. 1921. Early annals ofornithology. London: Witherby.
    • Kenward. H. K. 1997. Synanthrapic decomposer insects and the size, remoteness and longevity of archaeological occupatian sites: applying concepts from biogeography lo pas1 'islands' of human occupation, pp.135-52 in Ashworth. A. C.. Buckland, P. C.. and Sadler. I. P. (eds.). Studies in Quaternary enromology. An inordinatefondness for insecrs. (Quaternary Proceedings no. 5). Chichester: John Wiley & Sans.
    • Kenrard, H. K. and Hall. A. R. 1995. Biological evidencefrom 16- 22 Coppergore. (Archaeology of York 1417). York: Council for British Archaeology.
    • Luff. R. and Moreno-Garcia, M. 1995. Killing cats in the medieval period. An unusual episode in the history of Cambridge, England. Archaeofouna 4. 93-114.
    • MacAnhur, R. H , and Wilson, E. 0. 1967. The theory of isinnd biogeography. Princeton: Princeton Universily Press.
    • McCormick. F. 1997. The animal bones, pp. 819-853 in Hurley, M. F., Scully, 0. M. B., and McCutcheon, S. W. I. (eds.). Lore Viking-Age and medieval Worerford. Waterford: Waterford Corporation.
    • O'Connar. T. P. 1988. Bonelfrom rhe General Accident sire, Tanner ROW (Archaeology of York 1512). London: Council for British Archaeology.
    • O'Connor. T. P. 1992. Pets and pests in Roman and medieval Britain. Mammal Review 22(2), 107-113.
    • Pimm, S . L. 1982. Food webs. London: Chapman Hall.
    • Pimm. S . L. 1984. The complexity and stability ofecosyslems. h'ature 307, 321-6.
    • Pulman, R. J. 1994. Communiry ecology. London: Chapman & Hall.
    • Sabine. E. L. 1937. City cleaning in mediaeval London. Speculum 12, 19-43.
    • Schia. E. (ed.) 1988. "Mindets Tomt - SOndre Fell". Animal bones, rnors-, planr-, insect-, and porosite remains. (De Arkeologiske Utgravninger I Gamlebyen Oslo 5). Oslo: Alvheim &Bide.
    • Scott. S.A. 1991. The animal bones, pp. 2 1 6 3 3 in Armstmng, P., Tomlinson, D. G., and Evans, D. H. (eds.). Excavarions a1 Lurk Lane, Beverley, 1979-1982. Sheffield: Sheffield Excavalion Repons 1.
    • Scott. S. A. 1992. The animal bones, pp. 2 3 6 5 1 in Evans. D. H. and Tomlinson, D. G . (eds.). Excnvorions a1 33-35 Ensrgote, Beverley, 198346. Sheffield: Sheffield Excavation Reports 3.
    • Vince, A. G.(ed.) 1991. Aspects ofSaxon and N o m o n London 2: finds and environmenrnl evidence. (LAMAS Special Paper 12). London: London & Middlesex Archaeological Society.
    • Yodzis, P. 1986. Competilion, mortality and community structure, pp. 107-29 in Diamond. I. and Case, T. J.(eds.). Community ecology. New Y o l k Harper and Row.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok