LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Thomas, Robert (1998)
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects:
This thesis concerns the relationship between English and European Community administrative law. The main aim is to draw out the nature of this relationship by comparing the development of two principles, the principles of legitimate expectations and proportionality, within English and European Community administrative law. A secondary aim is to assess the challenge presented by European Community law for English law. The emphasis is on the distinct visions of law or legal traditions which have influenced both systems of administrative law rather than specific substantive laws. Chapter 2 identifies the nature of the English and Continental traditions of administrative law and the development of English and European Community administrative law. More specifically, English law is based on the common law approach while Continental and European Community administrative law has a more purposive orientation. Chapter 3 examines the pressures for the adoption of the two principles in English law. These pressures have been both internal, through the role of Lord Diplock, and external, through the influence of European Community law. In Chapters 4, 5, 6 and 7 the principles are examined in depth in both European Community and English administrative law. Comparative observations of the articulation of the principles in European Community law and their development in English law are made in chapters 5 and 7. In this respect the identification of the different traditions of administrative law becomes crucial in assessing the success of the principles as legal transplants in English law. The conclusion draws together these themes in order to identify the relationship between English and European Community law. An assessment is also made of the challenge presented by European Community law and suggestions are made as to what English law ought to do in order to respond effectively.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Section 3. The Inducement of Expectations. .............................
    • August T6pfer & Co. GmbH v. Commission (Case 112/77) [1978] E.C.R. 1019 Balkan-Import-Export GmbH v.
    • Hauptzollamt Berlin-Packhof [1973] E.C.R. 1091.
    • (Case 5/73) Belgian State v. Philipp Brothers SA (Case C-155/89) [1990] E.C.R. I-3265 ....
    • Bela-Muhle Josef Bergmann KG v. Grows Farm GmbH & Co. KG (Case 114/76) [1977] E.C.R. 1211 Commission v. Federal Republic of Germany (Case C-5/89) [1990] E.C.R. 1- 3437....................................
    • Commission v. Germany (Case 178/84) [1987] E.C.R. 1227,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.
    • Commission v. United Kingdom (Case 40/82) [1982] E.C.R. 2793,.,.,.,.,.,.,..
    • Decker v. Caisse de pension des employes pr ivee (Case 129/87) [1988] E.C.R.
    • 6121. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 De Pascale v. Commission (Case 164/80) [1982] E.C.R. 909 Denkavit Nederland BV v.
    • Hoofdproduktschap voor Akkerbouwprodukten (Case 15/83) [1984] E.C.R. 2171.............................
    • von Deetzen v. Hauptzollamt HamburgJonas (Case 170/86) [1988] E.C.R. 2355..
    • Stolp v. Einfuhr- und Vorratsstelle fur Getreide und Futtermittel (Case 5/75) [1975] E.C.R. 759.......................
    • Deutsche Milchkontor GmbH v. Federal Republic of Germany (Joined Cases 205 to 215/82) [1983] E.C.R. 2633..............
    • Draft Agreement relating to the creation of the European Economic Area (Opinion 1/91) [1991] E.C.R. I-6079..............
    • Edeka Zentrale AG v. Federal Republic of Germany (Case 245/81) [1982] E.C.R.
    • Einfuhr- und Vorratsstelle fur Getreide und Futtermittel v. Firma C. Mackprang (Case 2/75) [1975] E.C.R. 607...........
    • Ellinika Dimitriaka AE (Case C-371/92) [1994] E.C.R. I-2391....................
    • Commission (Case 47/75) [1976] E.C.R.
    • Ferriere San Carlo v. Commission 344/85) [1987] E.C.R. 4435..............
    • Grogan v. Commission [1982] E.C.R. 869 Werner Faust v. Commission (Case 52/81) [1982] E.C.R. 3745......................
    • Officier van Justitie v. Sandoz BV (Case 174/82) [1983] E.C.R. 2245..............
    • Olmuhle Hamburg AG v. Hauptzollamt Hamburg Waltershof (Joined Cases 119 and 120/76) [1977] E.C.R. 1269 Padovani (Remo) and the successors of Otello Mantovani v. Amministrazione delle finanze dello Stato (Case 210/87) [1988] E.C.R. 6177......................
    • Parti ecologiste 'Les Verts' v. European Parliament (Case 294/83) [1986] E. C.R.
    • Pastatter v. Hauptzollamt Reichenhall (Case C-217/89) E.C.R. 1-4585...........................
    • Rijn-Schelde-Verolme (RSV) Machinefabrieken en Scheepswerven Commission (Case 223/85) [1987] 4617....................................
    • Commission (Case 1252/79) [1980] E.C.R.
    • S.p.A. Ferriera Valsabbia v. Commission (Joined Cases 154, 205, 205, 226 to 228, 263 and 264/78, 39, 31, 83 and 85/79) [1980] E.C.R. 907.......................
    • Society for the Protection of Unborn Children Ireland Ltd. v. Grogan (Case C159/90) [1991] E.C.R. I-4685 . 354 Sofrimport SARL v. Commission (Case C152/88) [1990] E.C.R. I-2477 Transocean Marine Paint Association v.
    • Commission (Case 17/74) [1974] E.C.R.
    • United Kingdom v. Council (Case C-84/94) [1996] 3 C.M.L.R. 671...................
    • Van Duyn v. Home Office (Case 41/74) [1974] E.C.R. 1337......................
    • Van Gend en Loos v. Nederlandse Administratie der Belastingen 26/62) [1963] E.C.R. 1..................
    • Von Colson and Kamann v. Land NordrheinWestfalen (Case 14/83) [1984] E.C.R.
    • Jowell, J. and Lester, A., "Beyond Wednesbury: Substantive Principles of Administrative Law" [1987] P.L. 368.
    • Koopmans, T., "European Public Law: Reality and Prospects" [1991] P.L. 53.
    • Koopmans, T., "The Birth of European Law at the Crossroads of Legal Traditions" (1991) 39 A.J.C.L.
    • Koopmans, T., "Comparative Law and the Courts" (1996) 45 I.C.L.Q. 545.
    • Markesinis, B.S., "An Expanding Tort Law - The Price of a Rigid Contract Law" (1987) 103 L.Q.R.
    • Markesinis, B.S., "Comparative Law - A Subject in Search of an Audience" (1990) 53 M.L.R. 1.
    • Markesinis, B.S., "Judge, Jurist and the Study and Use of Foreign Law" (1993) 109 L.Q.R. 622.
    • Mitchell, J.D.B., "The Flexible ConstitutionN [1960] P.L. 332.
    • (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979) page 210.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article