Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Snowden, Michael; Daley-Yates, Sue; Halsall, Jamie P. (2016)
Publisher: Academic Research Publishing Group
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: L1
This paper presents the findings from an evaluatory pedagogical project that utilised an ethnographic case study approach to examine factors influencing the use of online formative assessment and feedback within an undergraduate programme.\ud The project posed the questions: \ud • What are the effects of introducing online formative assessment and feedback on learning and assessment performance? \ud • How effective is online formative feedback in enhancing student success?\ud The study draws upon data collected from a sample of students (22) who volunteered to participate in the research over a period of one academic year. Data collection tools included: focus group interview, semi-structured questionnaire and student assessment data. The study demonstrates that formative feedback and assessment is beneficial for teaching and learning, and that electronic assessment can offer a more flexible approach that can complement f2f feedback. Online formative feedback in the context of this study had a positive effect upon academic performance and student satisfaction, and demonstrates that students find online formative feedback effective and meaningful. Whilst the small size of the sample influences generalizability, the findings agree with the wealth of literature surrounding formative assessment and the benefits that accrue to students from delivering effective feedback. In addition, evidence from participants in this study is reflected in reports such as the JISC guide: “Effective Assessment in a Digital Age” (2010) and the findings from the EBEAM Project (2012) (Ellis, 2012
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Ahmed, N. and Teviotdale, W. (2007).The Value of Formative Assessment in Higher Education [online]. Available at: http://www.ece.salford.ac.uk/proceedings/papers/39_07.pdf [Accessed 4th October 2014].
    • Barnett, R. (2014).Conditions of Flexibility: Securing a more responsive higher education system. York: HEA
    • Bennett, E. and Youde, A. (2010). 'E-Tutoring'. In Avis, J., Fisher, R. and Thompson, R. (eds.)Teaching in Lifelong Learning: A Guide to Theory and Practice. Maidenhead: Open University press, pp.154-162.
    • Black, P. and William, D. (1998). 'Assessment and Classroom Learning', Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, Vol. 5 (1), March, pp.7-71.
    • Brown, G., Bull, J. and Pendlebury, M. (1997).Assessing Student Learning in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
    • Brown, S. (2006).Using Formative Assessment to promote student learning [online]. Available at: http://www.ldu.leeds.ac.uk/news/events/documents/BrownPowerPoint.pdf [Accessed 4th October 2014].
    • Butt, G. (2010).Making Assessment Matter. London: Continuum.
    • Cassell, C. and Symon, G. (Eds.). (2004). Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. London: Sage.
    • Catterall, M. and Maclaran, P.(1997). 'Focus Group Data and Qualitative Analysis Programs: Coding the Moving Picture as Well as the Snapshots', Sociological Research Online, Vol. 2 (1). Available at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/1/6.html. [Accessed 19thSeptember 2014].
    • Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2000).Research Methods in Education. 5th ed. Abingdon: RoutledgeFalmer
    • Denscombe, M. (2003).The Good Research Guide. 2nd ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Ellis, C. (2012). Assessment and Feedback: Huddersfield EBEAM Interim Report [online]. Available at: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearning/Assessment/interimreportsmarch12/AF% 20Interim%20Report%20March%202012%20Huddersfield%20EBEAM.pdf [Accessed 8th August 2014].
    • Evans, C. (2013). 'Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education',Review of Educational Research.83(1) pp. 70-12 Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D. and Davis, N. E. (2011). 'Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature', Computers & Education, Vol.57 (4) December, pp.2333-2351 [online]. Available at: Summon http://library.hud.ac.uk/summon[Accessed 17thOctober 2014].
    • Glaser and Strauss (1967).TheDiscovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine. James, M. (2006).'Assessment, teaching and Theories of Learning',InGardner, J. (ed.).Assessment and Learning. London: Sage, pp.47-60.
    • Nielson, J. (2005). Heuristic Evaluation [online]. Available at: http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/ [Accessed 27th December 2014].
    • NUS (2010).Charter on Feedback and Assessment [online]. Available at: http://www.nusconnect.org.uk/asset/news/6010/FeedbackCharter-toview.pdf [Accessed 3rd September, 2012].
    • O'Neil, C. A., Rietschel, M. J., and Fisher, C. A. (Eds.). (2013). Developing Online Learning Environments. 3rded. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
    • Perrenoud, P. (1998). 'From formative evaluation to a controlled regulation of learning process. Towards a wider conceptual field', Assessment in Education, Vol.5 (1), pp.85-102 [online]. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com.libaccess.hud.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/0969595980050105#.UhuN8H9Q7ms [Accessed 12th July 2012].
    • Remenyi, D. (2005). Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on e-Learning. Reading: Academic Conferences Ltd.
    • Robson, C. (2011).Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitionerresearchers (3rd Edition). Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Sadler, R. (1989). 'Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems', Instructional Science, Vol.18, pp.119-144[online].Available at:http://michiganassessmentconsortium.org/sites/default/files/MAC-ResourcesFormativeAssessmentDesignSystems.pdf [Accessed 18th November 2012].
    • Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2007).Research Methods for Business Students. 4th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.
    • Sharp, J. (2009).Success with your Education Research Project. Exeter: Learning Matters Ltd. turnitin, (n.d.).NumberOne Solution for Evaluating Written Work [online]. Available at: https://turnitin.com/gateway/index.html [Accessed 6th October 2012].
    • Yacci, M. (2000). 'Interactivity Demystified: A Structural definition for Distance Education and Intelligent CBT',Educational Technology,Vol. 40 (4), pp.5-16. [online]. Available at: http://www.ist.rit.edu/~may/interactiv8.pdf [Accessed 30th November 2013].
    • Yin, R. K. (2014).Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage Yorke, M. (2003). 'Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice', Higher Education,Vol. 45 (4), pp.477-501 [online]. Available at: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1023967026413#page-1 [Accessed 3rd September 2014].
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article