Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Lambirth, Andrew; Cabral, Ana; University of Greenwich; Boxgrove Alliance (2016)
Publisher: University of Greenwich
Languages: English
Types: Book
Subjects: LB

Classified by OpenAIRE into

This year my Colleague, Dr Ana Cabral, and I from the University of Greenwich have had the privilege of working with a group of talented teachers from schools within the Alliance who were all interested to study their own practice in order to enrich the learning of the children they teach.\ud \ud Ana and I wanted to introduce the teachers to action research. The classic work by Carr and Kemmis (1986) describe action research as being about:\ud • the improvement of practice;\ud • the improvement of the understanding of practice;\ud • the improvement of the situation in which the practice takes place.\ud It was important to us that the teachers were systematic about the way they undertook their investigations. Teachers are busy people and the degree to which they applied the methodology varied. We discussed their aims – constructing research questions or identifying the problem they wished to solve. We worked on the best ways of collecting data to inform their actions and we talked about the ethical issues of being an ‘insider-researcher’ and how to address them.\ud \ud \ud We met with the teachers at least three times during a term and on a number of occasions we went to schools or had telephones conversations when teachers were too busy to attend. The meetings with the teachers were fascinating. Research has informed us that the most effective forms of continuing professional development (CPD) (BERA/RSA 2014) involve:\ud • the use of specialist advisors and external experts\ud • collaborative enquiry and structured peer support\ud • the opportunity to explore why things do and don’t ‘work’\ud • the exploration and challenging of teachers own beliefs and assumptions (p.25 – 27).\ud ‘All the research indicates that enquiry-orientated learning is not a quick-fix, but needs to be a sustained over time to ensure that learning (for both teachers and pupils) actually takes place’. (BERA/RCA 2014: 26)\ud In this document we provide the reports from the teachers that describe their work. They document the processes with which the teachers were engaged. In most cases teachers collected information from their own surveys or interviews and/or from reading literature in the area. They then describe the action they felt to be appropriate and conclude with a brief evaluation of the success of their projects. They all demonstrate the teachers’ hard work and determination. We would like to extend our thanks to all the teachers and the children involved. (Andrew Lambirth)
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • BookTrust. (2015). Booklists. Retrieved February 15th, 2015, from BookTrust - Inspire a love of reading: http://www.booktrust.org.uk/books/children/booklists/
    • Carr, W. and Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
    • Centre for Literacy in Primary Education. (2015). Booklists. Retrieved February 15th, 2016, from CLPE - Quality children's literature at the heart of all learning: https://www.clpe.org.uk/library-and-resources/booklists
    • Cohen, L. and Manion, L. (1994). Chapter. Action Research. In L. Cohen, & L. Manion, Research Methods in Education (pp. 186-202). London & New York: Routledge.
    • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2005). Research Methods in Education (5th ed). London & New York: Routledge Falmer.
    • Kemmis, K. and McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory Action Research. In N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln, Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: SAGE.
    • Koshy, V. (2005). Action Research for Improving Practice. A Practical Guide. Paul Chapman Publishing.
    • Lambirth, A. (2016). Independent Reading Ideas and Activities. Handout collated by Andrew Lambirth and provided at a CPD session of Action Research - project supported and funded by the Boxgrove Alliance. . Handout not published or available online.
    • Lockwood, M. (2012). Attitudes to Reading in English Primary Schools. English in Education 46 (3), 228-246.
    • McNiff, J. and Whitehead, J. (2010). You and Your Action Research Project (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
    • Merisuo-Storm, T. (2006). Girls and Boys Like to Read and Write Different Texts. Scandinavian Journal of Education Research , 50 (2), 111-125.
    • Mertler, C. A. and Charles, C. M. (2008). Introduction to education research (6th Edition ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    • Pine, G. J. (2009). Teacher action research: Collaborative, participatory, and democratic inquiry. In Teacher Action Research: Building knowledge democracies. (pp. 29-62). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
    • Wallace, C. (1992). Reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Wilkinson, D., & Birmingham, P. (2003). Using Research Instruments: A guide for researchers. NY: Routledge Falmer.
    • Worthy, J., Moorman, M., & Turner, M. (1999). What Johnny likes to read is hard to find in school. Reading Research Quarterly , 34 (1), 12-27.
    • Zeni, J. (1998). A guide to ethical issues and action research. Educational Action Research , 6 (1), 9-19.
    • Morpurgo, M. (2006) Beowulf. London: Walker Books.
    • Myhill, D. (2006) Talk, talk, talk: teaching and learning in whole class discourse. Research Papers in Education 21(1), 19- 41.
    • National Council of Teachers of English (1992). Guideline on Teaching Storytelling.
    • Pine, G. J. (2009) Teacher action research: Collaborative, participatory, and democratic inquiry. In Teacher action research: Building knowledge democracies. (pp. 29-62). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
    • Pullman, P. (2000) The Amber Spyglass. Scholastic.
    • Rooke, J. and Lawrence, P. (2012) Transforming Writing: Interim Evaluation Report. London: National Literacy Trust.
    • Sapsford, R. and Jupp, V. (1996) Data Collection and Analysis. London: Sage.
    • Somekh, B. (2006) Action Research - a methodology for change and development. Maidenhead: Open University Press/ McGraw-Hill Education.
    • Stoyle, P. (2008) What Can Storytelling Offer? Available at: https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/storytellingbenefits-tips (accessed: 24th May 2016).
    • Stringer, E., Christensen, L. and Baldwin, S. (2010) Integrating teaching, learning, and action research: enhancing instruction in the K-12 classroom (Chapter 1: Action research in Teaching and Learning). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
    • Wells, G. (1986) The meaning makers: Children learning language and using language to learn. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
    • Zeni, J. (1998) A guide to ethical issues and action research. Educational Action Research 6(1), 9-19.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok