Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Flintoft, Ian David; Dawson, John Frederick; Dawson, Linda; Marvin, Andrew Charles; Alvarez, Jesus; Garcia, Salvador (2017)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Computational solvers are increasingly used to solve complex electromagnetic compatibility problems in research, product design and manufacturing. The reliability of these simulation tools must be demonstrated in order to give confidence in their results. Standards prescribe a range of techniques for the validation, verification and calibration of computational electromagnetics solvers including external references based on measurement or for cross-validation with other models. We have developed a modular test suite based on an enclosure to provide the EMC community with a complex external reference for model validation. We show how the test suite can be used to validate a range of electromagnetic solvers. The emphasis of the test suite is on features of interest for electromagnetic compatibility applications, such as apertures and coupling to cables. We have fabricated a hardware implementation of many of the test cases and measured them in an anechoic chamber over the frequency range to 1 – 6 GHz to provide a measurement reference for validation over this range. The test-suite has already been used extensively in two major aeronautical research programmes and is openly available for use and future development by the community.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] L. Sevgi, “Electromagnetic modeling and simulation: Challenges in validation, verification and calibration”, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 750-758, Aug. 2014.
    • [2] W. L. Oberkampf, M. M. Sindir and A. T. Conlisk, “Guide for the Verification and Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations”, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), Report AIAA G-077-1998, 1998.
    • [3] Oberkampf, T. Trucano and C. Hirsch, “Verification, validation and predictive capability in computational engineering and physics”, Appl. Mech. Rev., vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 345-384, 2004.
    • [4] IEEE STD 1597.1, “IEEE Standard for validation of computational electromagnetics computer modeling and simulations”, IEEE, NY, IEEE, 2008.
    • [5] IEEE STD P1597.2, “Recommended practice for validation of computational electromagnetics computer modeling and simulations”, IEEE, NY, 2010.
    • [6] J. F. Dawson, C. J. Smartt, I. D. Flintoft, C. Christopoulos, “Validating a numerical electromagnetic solver in a reverberant environment,” IET 7th International Conference on Computation in Electromagnetics (CEM2008), Brighton, UK, pp. 42-43, 7-10 April, 2008.
    • [7] C. Christopoulos, J. F. Dawson, L. Dawson, I. D. Flintoft, O. Hassan, A. C. Marvin, K. Morgan, P. Sewell, C. J. Smartt and Z. Q. Xie, “Characterisation and Modelling of Electromagnetic Interactions in Aircraft”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering: Special Issue on FLAVIIR, Vol. 224, No. 4, 2010, pp. 449-458.
    • [8] D. Tallini, J. F. Dawson, I. D. Flintoft, M. Kunze and I. Munteanu, “Virtual HIRF Tests in CST STUDIO SUITE - A Reverberant Environment Application”, International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications (ICEAA2011), Special Session on Numerical Methods for Challenging Multi-Scale Problems, Torino, Italy, 12-16 September, 2011. pp. 849-852.
    • [9] J. Alvarez, L. D. Angulo, A. R. Bretones and S. G. Garcia, “A comparison of the FDTD and LFDG methods for the estimation of HIRF transfer functions”, Computational Electromagnetics for EMC (CEMEMC'13), Granada, Spain, 19-21 March 2013.
    • [10] A. C. Marvin, I. D. Flintoft, J. F. Dawson, M. P. Robinson, S. J. Bale, S. L. Parker, M. Ye, C. Wan and M. Zhang, “Enclosure shielding assessment using surrogate contents fabricated from radio absorbing material”, 7th Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility & Signal Integrity and Technical Exhibition (APEMC 2016, Shenzhen, China, 18-21May, 2016.
    • [11] IEC, “Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) - Part 4-21: Testing and measurement techniques - Reverberation chamber test methods”, International Electrotechnical Commission, standard 61000-4-21, 2nd edition, January, 2011.
    • [12] K. F. Casey, “Electromagnetic shielding behavior of wire-mesh screens”, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol.30, no.3, pp.298-306, Aug. 1988.
    • [13] STM Standard D4935-10, “Standard test method for measuring the electromagnetic shielding effectiveness of planar materials”, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, June, 2010.
    • [14] C. L. Holloway, D. A. Hill, J. Ladbury, G. Koepke and R. Garzia, “Shielding effectiveness measurements of materials using nested reverberation chambers” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol.45, no.2, pp. 350- 356, May 2003.
    • [15] I. D. Flintoft, J. F. Dawson, A. C. Marvin and S. J. Porter, “Development of Time-Domain Surface Macro-Models from Material Measurements”, 23rd International Review of Progress in Applied Computational Electromagnetics (ACES2007), Verona, Italy, 19-23 March, 2007.
    • [16] AEG Box Test Suite, URL: https://bitbucket.org/uoyaeg/aegboxts.
    • [17] Emerson and Cuming Microwave Products, ECCOSORB LS Material Data Sheet. [Online]. Available: http://www.eccosorb.com.
    • [18] B. Gustavsen and A. Semlyen, “Rational approximation of frequency domain responses by vector fitting”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 14, pp. 1052 -1061, 1999.
    • [19] C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, 3rd edition, John Wiley, NJ, 3 May 2005.
    • [20] Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg. The CONCEPT-II website (2016). [Online]. Available: http://www.tet.tuhh.de/concept
    • [21] T. G. Tang, Q. M. Tieng and M. W. Gunn, “Equivalent circuit of a dipole antenna using frequency independent lumped elements”, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 100-103, 1993.
    • [22] R. J. Simpson, C. R. Jones, I. MacDiarmid, A. Duffy and D. Coleby, "The integrated error against log frequency (IELF) method for CEM validation”, 2005 IEEE International Symposium on in Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 1, pp. 296-300, Chicago, IL, 8-12 Aug. 2005.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.
  • BioEntity Site Name

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

  • EC | HIRF SE

Cite this article