Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Brolan, Claire E; Hill, Peter S; Ooms, Gorik (2015)
Publisher: BioMed Central
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Global health, COVERAGE, Law and Political Science, Research Article, Human rights, Sustainable Development Goals, INTERNATIONAL-RELATIONS, Post-2015, DISCOURSE, UNIVERSAL HEALTH, Qualitative research, Medicine and Health Sciences, Right to health, Human medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Abstract: Background: The Millennium Development Goals expire at the end of 2015 and global negotiations are underway to finalise the post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals. Much activism has occurred encouraging a post-2015 health and development goal embedded in the highest attainable standard of health ('right to health'). Despite this, the right to health was absent in three key post-2015 intergovernmental Sustainable Development Goal proposals in 2014, one of which was reinforced by the United Nations General Assembly in September 2014 as the guiding document for ongoing interstate negotiations. This article examines why it appears the right to health, so far, is not gaining direct expression in post-2015 discussion. Methods: This qualitative research is part of a broader study using thematic and discourse analysis examining the high-level policy debate on health goals in the discourse of the formulation of the post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals. Key-informant interviews were conducted in two interview rounds in 2013 and 2014, with participants from multilateral and other organisations (government, academia, civil society and philanthropy) responsible for health in the post-2015 development agenda (or the post-2015 development agenda more broadly). This study synthesises data from both interview rounds on Health and Human Rights in post-2015 Sustainable Development Goal negotiations. Results: Six reasons why the right to health may not have gained effective traction in the unfolding post-2015 Member State negotiations were found. The first three reasons relate to broader issues surrounding human rights' (including sexual and reproductive health and rights) positioning within international relations discourse, and the second three relate to the challenges of transforming the human right to health into a practically applied post-2015 health goal. Conclusions: This paper reports the views of participants, many of who sit at the interface of United Nations and Member State negotiations, on the right to health's location (and projected trajectory) at two temporal junctions in evolving post-2015 negotiations. The interviews provide insight into high-level hesitancy that the right to health be expressly incorporated in the final post-2015 health and development goal, as well as documents participants' doubt that rights language will explicitly frame the broader Sustainable Development Goals, their targets and indicators.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Ooms G, Brolan CE, Eggermont N, Eide A, Flores W, Forman L, et al. Universal health coverage anchored in the right to health. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91:2-2A.
    • 2. Brolan CE, Dagron S, Forman S, Hamonds R, Abdul Latif L, Waris A. Health rights in the post-2015 development agenda: including non-nationals. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91:719-719A.
    • 3. Grover A. The right to health in the post-2015 development paradigm. RHM. 2013;21(42):41-2.
    • 4. Berer M. A new development paradigm post-2015, a comprehensive goal for health that includes sexual and reproductive health and rights, and another for gender equality. RHM. 2013;21(42):4-12.
    • 5. Kickbusch I, Brindley C: Health in the Post-2015 Development Agenda: An analysis of the UN-led thematic consultations, High-Level Panel report and sustainable development debate in the context of health; 2013. http:// apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/85535/1/9789241505963_eng.pdf
    • 6. UNAIDS: Prioritizing people's right to health and development post-2015; 2013. http://www.unaids.org/en/resources/presscentre/featurestories/2013/ december/20131212laconsultation/
    • 7. Ely Yamin A, Frithjof Norheim O. Taking equality seriously: applying human rights frameworks to priority setting in health. HRQ. 2014;36(2):296-324.
    • 8. Report of the High-Level Panel of Eminent Persons on the Post-2015 Development Agenda: A New Global Partnership: Eradicate Poverty and Transform Economies Through Sustainable Development; 2013. http:// www.un.org/sg/management/pdf/HLP_P2015_Report.pdf
    • 9. Sustainable Development Solutions Network: An Action Agenda for Sustainable Development: Report for the U.N. Secretary General; 2013. http://unsdsn.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/140505-An-Action-Agendafor-Sustainable-Development.pdf
    • 10. World Health Organization: Positioning Health in the Post-2015 Development Agenda. WHO Discussion Paper; 2012. http://www.who.int/ topics/millennium_development_goals/post2015/WHOdiscussionpaper_ October2012.pdf
    • 11. Report of the Global Thematic Consultation on Health: Health in the Post-2015 Agenda; 2013. http://www.worldwewant2015.org/health
    • 12. World Health Organization: Overarching Health Goal: Ensure healthy lives and universal health coverage at all ages; 2014. http://ncdalliance.org/sites/ default/files/rfiles/WHO%20Goals%20and%20Targets%20SDGs.pdf
    • 13. Open Working Group for Sustainable Development Goals: Introduction to the Proposal of the Open Working Group for Sustainable Development Goals; 2014. http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/ 4518SDGs_FINAL_Proposal%20of%20OWG_19%20July%20at% 201320hrsver3.pdf
    • 14. Common position on Means of Implementation for SDGs by the Group of 77 and China: Submission by the G77 and China proposing targets corresponding to each of the goals contained in the OWG's zero draft; 2014. http://post2015.org/2014/06/19/post-2015-resources-round-up-35/; http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/ 4209G77%20common%20position%20MOI.pdf
    • 15. African Union: Common African Position (CAP) on the post 2015 Development Agenda launched, Press Release No. 128/2014; 2014. http://ea.au.int/en/content/common-african-position-cap-post-2015- development-agenda-launched
    • 16. United Nations General Assembly: Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 10 September 2014. 68/309. Report of the Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals established pursuant to General Assembly resolution 66/288; 2014. http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/ view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/68/309
    • 17. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs: General Assembly adopts resolution on SDGs report; 2014. http://www.un.org/en/ development/desa/news/sustainable/sdgs-post2015.html
    • 18. Ooms G, Latif LA, Waris A, Brolan CE, Hammonds R, Friedman EA, et al. Is universal health coverage the practical expression of the right to health care? BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2014;14:3.
    • 19. Liamputtong P, Ezzy D. Qualitative Research Methods (2nd Edition). Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2005.
    • 20. Brolan CE, Hill PS. Sexual and reproductive health and rights in the evolving post-2015 agenda: perspectives from key players from multilateral and related agencies in. RHM. 2013;22(43):65-74.
    • 21. Forman, L: To 2015 and Beyond: Rights rhetoric in the post-2015 health development agenda. International Studies Association (ISA) Annual Conference, Toronto, Canada; 28 March 2014.
    • 22. Milliken J. The study of discourse in international relations: a critique of research and methods. Eur J Int Rel. 1999;5(2):225-54.
    • 23. Attride-Stirling J. Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qual Res. 2001;1(3):385-405.
    • 24. Cheek J. At the margins? Discourse analysis and qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2004;14(8):1140-50.
    • 25. Stammers N. Social movements and the social construction of human rights. HRQ. 1999;21(4):980-1008.
    • 26. Finnemore M, Sikkink K. Taking stock: the constructivist research program in international relations and comparative politics. Annu Rev Polit Sci. 2001;4:391-416.
    • 27. Goodman R, Jinks D. How to influence states; socialization and international human rights law. Duke LJ. 2004;54(3):621-703.
    • 28. Forman L. “Rights” and wrongs: what utility for the right to health in reforming trade rules on medicines? Health Hum Rights. 2008;10(2):37-52.
    • 29. United Nations General Assembly: Global health and foreign policy, A/67/ L.36; 2012. http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/67/ L.36&referer=http://www.un.org/en/ga/info/draft/index.shtml&Lang=E
    • 30. Darrow M. The millennium development goals: milestones or millstones? human rights priorities for the post-2015 development agenda. YHRDLJ. 2012;15(1):55-74.
    • 31. Fakuda-Parr S. Recapturing the narrative of international development. In: Wilkinson R, Hulme D, editors. The Millennium Development Goals and Beyond. London: Routledge; 2012.
    • 32. Ooms G. From international health to global health: how to foster a better dialogue between empirical and normative disciplines. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2014;14:36.
    • 33. McLeod J, Thomson R. Researching Social Change: Qualitative Approaches. London: Sage; 2009.
    • 34. Hulme D: The Millennium Development Goals (MDGS): A Short History of the World's Biggest Promise; 2009. http://www.bwpi.manchester.ac.uk/ medialibrary/publications/working_papers/bwpi-wp-10009.pdf
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects


Cite this article