LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Ridley-Duff, R. (2010)
Publisher: Emerald
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Purpose: Prevailing concepts of corporate governance that are based on external shareholder interests have been challenged by a number of authors over the last three decades. In this paper, the core assumptions of communitarian philosophy and values are outlined, together with the way writers imagine these might be enacted in a social enterprise context. These assumptions are then explored using two case studies.

\ud Design/Methodology: The study was conducted using participatory action research which involves parties examining current actions together and seeking to improve on them. The value of this approach is based on the plausible, authentic and critical insights it generates into management practice.

\ud Findings: Case evidence suggests that companies are able to adopt and operate effectively while deploying communitarian values, and that these values lead to alternative business objectives expressed through new forms of corporate governance. Nevertheless, the adopting of common language does not necessarily mean that social enterprises share a common philosophy.

\ud Originality/Value: The key contribution of this paper is to evaluate the institutionalisation of governance and consider the relationship between the form and substance of practice. By considering the link between words and actions, the study concludes that the adoption of a governance framework, or particular language, matters less than the capacity of company members to participate in the development of governance norms that enable them to act congruently with their own beliefs and values.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Avineri, S. and Avner de-Shalit (eds) (1992) Communitarianism and Individualism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • BBC (1980) The Mondragon Experiment, Horizon Documentary, http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7565584850785786404#, accessed 30 October 2009.
    • Beeby, P. and Norris, R. (2000), The Sportasia Community Company Model, Sheffield: Sportasia Ltd.
    • Berry, A., Broadbent, J. and Otley, D. (1995) Management Control: Theories, Issues and Practices, Basingstoke: Macmillan Press Ltd.
    • Borzaga, C. and Defourny, J. (2001) The Emergence of Social Enterprise, London: Routledge.
    • Bradley, K., and Gelb, A. (1980) “Motivation and control in the Mondragon experiment”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 19(2): 211-231.
    • Bradley, K. & Gleb, A. (1983) Cooperation at Work: The Mondragon Experience, Heinemann Educational Books.
    • Brown, J. (2006) “Designing Equity Finance for Social Enterprises”, Social Enterprise Journal, 2(1): 73-81.
    • Guba, E. and Lincoln, Y. S. (1994) “Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research”, in Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
    • Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P. (1995) Ethnography: Principles in Practice, London: Routledge.
    • Handy, C. (2002) The Hungry Spirit: New Thinking for a New World, London: Arrow.
    • Hawthorne, J. (2007): „Cartesian dualism‟. In P. van Inwagen and D. Zimmerman (eds), Persons Human a nd Divine, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Herman, N. and Brignall, S. (2005) Financial Shared Services Centres and the Role of the Accountant, paper to Management Control Association, Jan 25th, Milton Keynes.
    • Johnson, P., Buehring, A., Cassell, C. and Symon, G. (2006) “Evaluting Qualitative Management Research: Towards a Contingent Criteriology”, International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(3): 131-156.
    • Johnson, P. (2006) “Whence Democracy? A Review and Critique of the Conceptual Dimensions and Implications of the Business Case for Organizational Democracy”, Organization, 13(2): 245-274.
    • Johnson, P. and Duberley, J. (2000), Understanding Management Research: An introduction to epistemology, London: Sage Publications
    • Kasmir, S. (1996), The Myth of Mondragon, New York: State University of New York Press.
    • Lezamiz, M. (2003) Personal communication with Ridley-Duff on 5th March 2003. The Global300 website of the ICA continues to report that the Mondragon Cooperatives are still the top-ranked European enterprise for workplace democracy.
    • Low, C. (2006) “A framework for governance of social enterprise”, International Journal of Social Economics, 33(5/6): 376-385.
    • Lukes, S. (1974) Power: A Radical View, Basingstoke: Macmillan Education.
    • Mason, C. (2009) “Governance and Social Enterprises”. In Doherty, B. (Ed.) Social Enterprise Management. London: Sage Publications, pp. 212-239.
    • Mayo, E. (1933) The Human Problems of Industrial Civilization, New York: Macmillan.
    • MCC (2003) Personal communication (lecture handouts: management seminar), Mondragon: Otalora, 4th March 2003.
    • Monzon, J. L. and Chaves, R. (2008) “The European Social Economy: Concept and Dimensions of the Third Sector”, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 79(3/4): 549-577.
    • Morrison, R., (1991), We Build the Road as We Travel, Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.
    • Mulhall, S. and Swift, A. (1992), Liberals and Communitarians: An Introduction, Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Oakeshott, (1991), The Case for Worker Coops, 2nd Edition, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
    • Ouchi, W. (1980) “Markets, Bureaucracies and Clans”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 25: 129-141.
    • Owen, R. D. (1824) „An Outline of the System of Education at New Lanark‟, in: H. Silver (ed.) (1969) Robert Owen on Education, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Ridley-Duff, R. J. (2003) Mondragon Cooperative Corporation: Transcript of Seminar on Corporate Governance, Otalora Management School, Mondragon, 5th March 2003, downloaded from http://www.scribd.com/doc/21644627 on 21 November 2009.
    • Ridley-Duff, R. J., Cullen, J., Beeby, P. and Norris, R. (2003), Enterprise for Communities: Proposals for a Community Interest Company, Submission by Sheffield Hallam University/School Trends Ltd, 15th June 2003, downloaded from http://www.scribd.com/doc/13647544/ on 21 November 2009. Sections 4 to 6 outline The Community Company using three models: management; governance; ownership.
    • Ridley-Duff, R. J. (2005) Communitarian Perspectives on Corporate Governance, PhD Thesis, Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University, downloaded from http://www.scribd.com/doc/3271344/ on 21 November 2009.
    • Ridley-Duff, R. J. (2008) “Social Enterprise as a Socially Rational Business”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 14(5): 291-312.
    • Ridley-Duff, R. J. (2009) “Cooperative Social Enterprises: company rules, access to finance and management practice”, Social Enterprise Journal, 5(1): 50-69.
    • Roan, T. (2009) “Employee Representatives: The Role, The Skills, The Challenges”, presentation to the Employee Ownership Conference, 11th November, NEC, Birmingham.
    • Smith, A. (1759) The Theory of Moral Sentiments (Vol 1), Indianapolis, Liberty Fund Inc. http://files.libertyfund.org/files/192/Smith_0141-01_EBk_v4.pdf , accessed 30th October 2009.
    • Spear, R., Cornforth, C. and Aitken, M. (2007) For Love and Money: Governance and Social Enterprise, London: NCVO.
    • Tam, H. (1999), Communitarianism, Basingstoke: Macmillan Press Ltd.
    • Thomas, D. (2006) “A General Inductive Approach for Analysing Qualitative Evaluation Data”, Amercian Journal of Evaluation, 27(2): 237-246.
    • Thomas, H. and Logan, C. (1982) Mondragon: An Economic Analysis, New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
    • Turnbull, S. (1994), “Stakeholder Democracy: Redesigning The Governance of Firms and Bureaucracies”, Journal of Socio-Economics, 23(3): 321-360.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article