Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Ehi-Uujamhan, Oseasunmhen
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
The availability of regular supply has been identified as one of the major stimulants for the growth and development of any nation and is thus important for the economic well-being of a nation. The problems of the Nigerian power sector stems from a lot of factors culminating in her slow developmental growth and inability to meet the power demands of her citizens regardless of the abundance of human and natural resources prevalent in the nation. The research therefore had the main aim of investigating the importance and contributions of risk management to the success of projects specific to the power sector. To achieve this aim it was pertinent to examine the efficacy of risk management process in practice and elucidate the various risks typically associated with projects (Construction, Contractual, Political, Financial, Design, Human resource and Environmental risk factors) in the power sector as well as determine the current situation of risk management practice in Nigeria. To address this factors inhibiting the proficiency of the overarching and prevailing issue which have only been subject to limited in-depth academic research, a rigorous mixed research method was adopted (quantitative and qualitative data analysis). A review of the Nigeria power sector was also carried out as a precursor to the data collection stage. Using purposive sampling technique, respondents were identified and a questionnaire survey was administered. The research hypotheses were tested using inferential statistics (Pearson correlation, Chi-square test, t-test and ANOVA technique) and the findings revealed the need for the development of a new risk management implementation Framework. The proposed Framework was tested within a company project, for interpreting the dynamism and essential benefits of risk management with the aim of improving the project performances (time), reducing the level of fragmentation (quality) and improving profitability (cost) within the Nigerian power sector in order to bridge a gap between theory and practice. It was concluded that Nigeria’s poor risk management practices have prevented it from experiencing strong growth and development. The study however, concludes that the successful implementation of the developed risk management framework may help it to attain this status by enabling it to become more prepared and flexible, to face challenges that previously led to project failures, and thus contributing to its prosperity. The research study provides an original contribution theoretically, methodologically and practically which adds to the project risk management body of knowledge and to the Nigerian power sector.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Pinto,J. K. and Prescott, J. E.(1988).Variationsin Critical Success Factors Over the Stages in the Project Life Cycle. Journal of Management.14(1), 5-18.
    • PMI 2008. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide).4th edn. UK: Project management institute
    • PMI 2004. A guide to the project management body of knowledge: PMBOK. 3rd ed. Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute, Inc.
    • Program Development and Evaluation, (1996). AnalyzingQuantitaive Data [pdf]. Available through [Accessed on 21 July 2014]
    • Program Development and Evaluation, (2003). Analyzing Qualitative Data. Available through http://learningstore.uwex.edu/assets/pdfs/g3658-12.pdf[Accessed on 18th July 2014]
    • Power, M. (2004). The risk management of everything. Journal of Risk Finance, 5(3), 58-65.
    • Project Management Institute, (2000). A Guide to the Project Management Body of knowledge. USA: Project Management Institute
    • Purdy, G. (2010). ISO 31000: 2009-setting a new standard for risk management. Risk analysis, 30(6), 881-886.
    • Rahman, A. Varuttamasenia, A., Kintner-Meyerb, M. and Lee, C. J., (2013). Application of fault tree analysis for customer reliability assessment of a distribution power system. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 111, 76-85.
    • Randall, S. (2008). Energy, Risk and Competitive Advantage: The Information Imperative. PennWell Books, Tusla Oklahoma.
    • Ranong, N. P. and Phuenngam, W. (2009). Critical Success Factors for effective risk management procedures in financial industries. [pdf]. Available through: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:233985/fulltext01 [Accessed on 03rd February, 2014].
    • Rastogi, K. A., (2010). On Corporate Governance Practices in NTPC: India's Largest Power Generating Company. [pdf]. Available through: http://www.oecd.org/daf/ca/corporategovernanceofstateownedenterprises/48061717.pdf [Accessed on 18th March. 2014].
    • Raz, T., Shenhar, J. A. and Dvir, D., (2002). Risk management, project success and technological uncertainty. R&D Management Blackwell Publishers, 32(2),101- 109.
    • Raz, T. and Hillson, D. (2005). A comparative review of risk management standards. Risk Management: An International Journal, 7, 53-66.
    • Renn, O. (1999). A model for an analytic-deliberative process in risk management. Environmental Science and Technology, 33(18), 3049-3055.
    • Riplova, K, (2007). Risk and Decision Making Process. Journal of Information, Control and Management Systems, 5(2), 331-336
    • Robson, C., (2002). Real World Research (2nd ed): A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner Researchers. Oxford: Blackwell,
    • Rochart, J. F. (1982). The changing role of information systems executive: A critical success factors perspective, Sloan Management Review. 24 (1) 3-13.
    • Rogers, D. (2014). The Electrification of Africa. Available though: . [Accessed on 15th August 2014]
    • Rolland, H. (2008). Using IT to drive effective risk management. The Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. (RIMS), 55(1), 43-44.
    • Rowlinson, S., and McDermott, P. (Eds.). (2005). Procurement systems: A guide to best practice in construction. New York: Routledge
    • Rozenes, S, Vitner, G and Spraggett, S (2006). Project control: literature review. Project Management Journal, September 2006, 37(4), 5-14.
    • RIMS (2012). New strategic risk management implementation guide. Risk insurance and management society, Inc. www.rims.org
    • Sambo, A. S. (2008). Matching electricity supply with demand in Nigeria. International association for energy economics, (Fourth Quarter), 32-38.
    • Sambo, A. S., Garba, B., Zarma, I. H., and Gaji, M. M. (2012). Electricity generation and the present challenges in the Nigerian power sector. Journal of Energy and Power Engineering, 6(7), 1050-1059.
    • Samson, S., Reneke, A. J. and Wiecek, M. M., (2009). A review of different perspectives on uncertainty and risk and an alternative modelling paradigm. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 94. 558-567.
    • Sandberg, J. and Alvesson, M., (2011). Ways of constructing research questions: gap-spotting or problematization? Organization, 18 (1), 23-44.
    • Sapsford, R., (2007). Survey Research. 2ndedn. London: SAGE Publications Ltd Särndal, C., Swensson, B. and Wretman, J., (1992). Model Assisted Survey Sampling. New York: Springler-Verlag Inc.
    • Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A., (2003). Research Methods for Business Students.3rd edition, Harlow: Pearson Education. Prentice Hall.
    • Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A., (2007). Research Methods for Business Students. 4th edition, Harlow: Pearson Education. Prentice Hall.
    • Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A., (2009). Research Methods for Business Students. 5th edition, Harlow: Pearson Education. Prentice Hall.
    • Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A., (2012). Research Methods for Business Students. 6th edition, Pearson, Harlow: Pearson Education. Prentice Hall.
    • Saunders, F. C., Gale, A. W., and Sherry, A. H. (2015). Conceptualising uncertainty in safety-critical projects: A practitioner perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 467-478.
    • Schenker, J. D., and Rumrill, Jr, P. D. (2004). Causal-comparative research designs. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 21(3), 117-121.
    • Sharma, K. A. and Vashishtha, A. (2007). Weather derivatives: risk-hedging prospects for agriculture and power sectors in India. Journal of Risk Finance, 8(2), 112-132.
    • Shaw, G., Saayman, M., and Saayman, A. (2012). Identifying risks facing the South African tourism industry. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 15(2), 190-206.
    • Shehu, Z., and Akintoye, A. (2011). The critical success factors for effective programme management: a pragmatic approach. The Built and Human Environment Review, 2.
    • Shen, L. Y., Platten, A., and Deng, X. P. (2006). Role of public private partnerships to manage risks in public sector projects in Hong Kong. International Journal of Project Management, 24(7), 587-594.
    • Shin, N. (1999). Does information technology improve coordination? An empirical analysis. Logistics Information Management. 12(2), 138-144.
    • Shortreed, J., Hicks, J., and Craig, L. (2003). Basic Frameworks for Risk Management. Final Report Prepared for The Ontario Ministry of the Environment. NERAM: Network for Environmental Risk Assessment and Management.
    • Simister, T., (2000). Risk management: the need to set standards. Balance Sheet. 8(4), 9-10.
    • Singh, A. (2006). Power sector reform in India: current issues and prospects. Energy Policy, 34(16), 2480-2490.
    • Singh, R., and Mangat, N. S. (2013). Elements of survey sampling, Springer Science and Business Media, 15.
    • Skaates, A. M., Tikkanen, H. and Lindblom, J., (2002). Relationships and project marketing success. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing. 17(5). 389- 406.
    • Smith, N. J., Merna, T., and Jobling, P. (2006). Managing risk in construction projects. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Smith, N. J., Merna, T., and Jobling, P. (2014). Managing risk in construction projects. 3rd ed. Chichester, West Sussex Wiley-Blackwell.
    • Söderlund, J. (2004). Building theories of project management: past research, questions for the future. International journal of project management, 22(3), 183-191.
    • Speziale, H.J., Streubert, H.J. and Carpenter, D.R., (2011). Qualitative Research in Nursing. 5thedn. China: Liincott Williams and Wiltkins
    • Steinke, I. (2004). Quality criteria in qualitative research. A companion to qualitative research, 184-190.
    • Stoneburner, G., Goguen, A. Y., and Feringa, A. (2002). Sp 800-30. risk management guide for information technology systems. National institute for Standards and Technology. Gaithersburg, MD, United States.
    • Tallapragada, P. V. S. N., and Adebusuyi, B. S. (2008). Nigeria's power sector: Opportunities and challenges. Economic Policy Options for a Prosperous Nigeria. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 301-327.
    • Tallapragada, P. V. S. N. (2009). Nigeria's Electricity Sector-Electricity and gas pricing barriers. International Association for Energy Economics, 29-34.
    • Tashakkori, A. and Creswell, J.W., (2007). Exploring the nature of research questions in mixed methods research. Journal of mixed research , 1(3), 207- 211
    • Tchankova, L. (2002). Risk identification-basic stage in risk management. Environmental Management and Health, 13(3), 290-297.
    • Teddlie, C., and Tashakkori, A. (Eds.)., (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, California. Sage Publications Inc.
    • Terrados, J., Almonacid, G., and Hontoria, L., (2007). Regional energy planning through SWOT analysis and strategic planning tools. Impact on renewables development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11(6), 1275- 1287.
    • Thomas, J.R., Nelson, J.K. and Silverman, S.J., (2015). Research Methods in Physical Activity. 7thedn. USA: Human Kinetics Publishers Thornhill, A., Saunders., M. and Lewis, P., (2008). Research methods for business students. Pearson Education Limited.
    • Tiong, L. K. R, (2000). Government suort and risk-return trade-off in China's BOT power projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 7(4), 412-422.
    • Treven, S. 2003. International training: the training of managers for assignment abroad. Education + Training. 45(8/9), 550-557.
    • Tuckett, A. G. (2005). Applying thematic analysis theory to practice: A researcher's experience. Contemporary Nurse, 19(1-2), 75-87.
    • Tuckman, B. W., and Harper, B. E. 2012. Conducting educational research (6th ed). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Plymouth, United Kingdom.
    • Umeora, C.E. (2013). Effects of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) on Economic Growth in Nigeria. Department of Banking and Finance. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=2285329 Valsamakis, A. C., Vivian, R. W. and DuToit, G. S. (2005). Risk management: Managing enterprise risks. 3rd Ed. Sandton: Heinemann Higher and Further Education.
    • Valsamakis, A. C., Vivian, R. W. and DuToit, G. S., (2000). Risk management. 2nd Ed. Sandton: Heinemann Higher and Further Education.
    • Van den Berg, P. T., and Wilderom, C. P. (2004). Defining, measuring, and comparing organisational cultures. Applied Psychology, 53(4), 570-582.
    • Wahl, M. F. (2011). Governance and Ownership: Methodological Aspects of Qualitative Ownership Research. In Baltic Business and Socio-economic Development 2009: 5th International Conference, Kalmar, Sweden, (3), 260. BWV Verlag.
    • Wahyuni, D. (2012). The research design maze: Understanding paradigms, cases, methods and methodologies. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 10(1), 69-80.
    • Wall, T. D., Michie, J., Patterson, M., Wood, S. J., Sheehan, M., Clegg, C. W., and West, M. (2004). On the validity of subjective measures of company performance. Personnel psychology, 57(1), 95-118.
    • Wang, S. Q., Tiong, R. L., Ting, S. K., and Ashley, D. (2000). Evaluation and management of political risks in China's BOT projects. Journal of construction engineering and management, 126(3), 242-250.
    • Ward, S. C., and Chapman, C. B. (1991). Extending the use of risk analysis in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 9(2), 117- 123.
    • Weber, R. (2004). Editor's comments: the rhetoric of positivism versus interpretivism: a personal view. MIS quarterly, 28(1), 3-12.
    • Westland, J., (2006). Project Management Life Cycle: A Complete Step-by-step Methodology for Initiating Planning Executing and Closing the Project. Kogan: Page Limited. Pentonville, United Kingdom.
    • Wheelen, T. L., and Hunger, J. D. (2011). Concepts in strategic management and business policy. Pearson Education India.
    • Whitehead, J. and Mcniff, J., (2009).You and Your Action Research Project. 3rdedn. New York: Rutledge
    • Willams, T. M. (1994). Using a risk register to integrate risk management in project definition. International Journal of Project Management, 12(1), 17-22.
    • Wimmer, R.D. and Dominick, J.R., (2006). Mass Media in Research: an Introduction. 8thedn. California: Thomson Wadsworth
    • Winch, G. M. (2006). Towards a theory of construction as production by projects. Building Research and Information, 34(2), 154-163.
    • Woods, M., (2011). Risk Management in Organizations: An Integrated Case Study Approach. New York: Routledge.
    • Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., and Peng, M. W. (2005). Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of management studies, 42(1), 1-33.
    • Yamakawa, Y., Peng, M. W., and Deeds, D. L. (2008). What drives new ventures to internationalize from emerging to developed economies?. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 59-82.
    • Yanow, D., & Ybema, S. (2009). Interpretivism in organizational research: On elephants and blind researchers. The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods,Sage Publication, Bodmin, 39-60.
    • Yin, R.K., (1998). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publication, London.
    • Yin, R. K., (2013). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd Ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc. London
    • Young, R. and Jordan, E. (2008). Top management support: Mantra or necessity? International Journal of Project Management. 26(7), 713-725.
    • Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., and Tamošaitiene, J., (2010). Risk assessment of construction projects. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 16(1), 33.
    • Zayed, T. Amer, M. and Pan, J. (2008). Assessing risk and uncertainty inherent in Chinese highway projects using AHP. International Journal of Project Management, 26(4), 408- 419.
    • Zou, P., Zhang, G. and Wang, J., (2007). Identifying Key Risks in Construction Projects: Life Cycle and Stakeholder Perspectives. Sydney: Faculty of Built Environment, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
    • Zsidisin, G. A., Panelli, A., and Upton, R. (2000). Purchasing organization involvement in risk assessments, contingency plans, and risk management: an exploratory study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 5(4), 187-198.
    • Zwikael, O. 2008. Top management involvement in project management A cross country study of the software industry. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 1(4), 498-511.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article