LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Williams, Dina (2013)
Publisher: Emerald
Languages: English
Types: Part of book or chapter of book
Subjects: H1
This paper aims to examine the effects of physical infrastructure including incubators and science parks on level of innovation activity and performance of new technology-based firms. It reviews evidence from Western countries comparing various assessment of the impact of science parks on the firms. Next the paper examines the development of science park movement in Russia. Then it explores the empirical evidence from a case-study university in attempt to analyse the shortcomings in present state of the support infrastructure in Russian from point of view of the technology-based companies.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Autio, E., & Yli-Renko, H. (1998). New, technology-based firms as agents of technological rejuvenation. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 10(1), 71 - 92.
    • Birley, S. (2002). Universities, Academics, and Spinout Companies: Lessons from Imperial. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 1(1), 1 - 21.
    • Bray, M. J., & Lee, J. N. (2000). University revenues from technology transfer: Licensing fees vs. equity positions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5-6), 385-392.
    • C.News (2007). By 2011 Russian technoparks will turn 117 bn. RUR. Journal. Retrieved from http://www.cnews.ru/news/line/index.shtml?2007/03/20/241179#
    • Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32(2), 209-227.
    • Hansson, F., Husted, K., & Vestergaard, J. (2005). Second generation science parks: from structural holes jockeys to social capital catalysts of the knowledge society. Technovation, 25(9), 1039-1049.
    • Heydebreck, P., Klofsten, M., & Maier, J. C. (2000). Innovation support for new technologybased firms: the Swedish Technopol approach. R&D Management, 30(1), 89-99.
    • Kihlgren, A. (2003). Promotion of innovation activity in Russia through the creation of science parks: the case of St. Petersburg (1992-1998). Technovation, 23(1), 65-76.
    • Lindelof, P., & Lofsten, H. (2002). Growth, management and financing of new technology-based firms--assessing value-added contributions of firms located on and off Science Parks. Omega, 30(3), 143-154.
    • Lofsten, H., & Lindelof, P. (2002). Science Parks and the growth of new technology-based firms-academic-industry links, innovation and markets. Research Policy, 31(6), 859-876.
    • Lofsten, H., & Lindelof, P. (2003). Determinants for an entrepreneurial milieu: Science Parks and business policy in growing firms. Technovation, 23(1), 51-64.
    • Lofsten, H., & Lindelof, P. (2005). R&D networks and product innovation patterns--academic and non-academic new technology-based firms on Science Parks. Technovation, 25(9), 1025-1037.
    • Malakhov, лю. (2006). Russia's technoparks will receive 26 bn RUR. Journal. Retrieved from http://www.cnews.ru/news/top/index.shtml?2006/10/06/213110
    • McAdam, M., & McAdam, R. (2008). High tech start-ups in University Science Park incubators: The relationship between the start-up's lifecycle progression and use of the incubator's resources. Technovation, 28(5), 277-290.
    • Meyer, M. (2003). Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research-based ventures and public support mechanisms. R & D Management, 33(2), 107 - 115.
    • Mian, S. A. (1996). The university business incubator: A strategy for developing new research/technology-based firms. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 7(2), 191-208.
    • Mian, Z. A. (1997). Assessing and managing the university technology business incubator: an integrative framework. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 251-285.
    • Oakey, R. P., & Mukhtar, S.-M. (1999). United Kingdom High-technology Small Firms in Theory and Practice: A Review of Recent Trends. International Small Business Journal, 17(2), 48-64.
    • Quintas, P., Wield, D., & Massey, D. (1992). Academic-industry links and innovation: questioning the science park model. Technovation, 12(3), 161-175.
    • Rothaermel, F. T., & Thursby, M. (2005a). Incubator firm failure or graduation?: The role of university linkages. Research Policy, 34(7), 1076-1090.
    • Rothaermel, F. T., & Thursby, M. (2005b). University-incubator firm knowledge flows: assessing their impact on incubator firm performance. Research Policy, 34(3), 305-320.
    • Shukshinov, V. E., & Tabachenko, I. H. 10th Anneversary of Russian technoparks. Retrieved 20/05/2009, from http://technoparki.narod.ru/tpark/tparks_russia.htm
    • Siegel, D. S., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2003a). Assessing the impact of university science parks on research productivity: exploratory firm-level evidence from the United Kingdom. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1357-1369.
    • Siegel, D. S., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2003b). Science Parks and the Performance of New Technology-Based Firms: A Review of Recent U.K. Evidence and an Agenda for Future Research. Small Business Economics, 20(2), 177-184.
    • Venkataraman, S. (2004). Regional transformation through technological entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 153 - 167.
    • Westhead, P., & Storey, D. J. (1995). Links between higher education institutions and high technology firms. Omega, 23(4), 345-360.
    • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research. Design and Method (Third ed. Vol. 5). London: SAGE Publication.
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
    40
    40%
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article