LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Murray, Gregory P D; Stillman, Richard A.; Britton, J.R. (2016)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
The functional response describes the relationship between feeding rate and prey density, and is important ecologically as it describes how foraging behaviour may change in response to food availability. The effects of habitat complexity and food item size were experimentally tested on the foraging parameters and functional responses of the freshwater fish roach Rutilus rutilus. Habitat complexity was varied through the manipulation of substrate and turbidity, and food item size was varied by using fishmeal pellets in two sizes. As water turbidity and substrate complexity increased, the reaction distance and consumption rate (per number) significantly decreased. Increased food item size significantly decreased consumption rates (per number) but had no influence on any other foraging parameter. Analysis of the interactions between substrate complexity, turbidity and food item size revealed food item size had the greatest influence on consumption rate (per number). Turbidity had the least effect on all the foraging parameters tested. Across all experiments, the functional responses were best described by the Type II response, a relatively consistent finding for R. rutilus. These outputs reveal that fish foraging behaviours and functional responses are highly context dependent, varying with environmental parameters and the availability of food resources of different sizes.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 0.01 and adjusted R2 = 0.96, F1,3 = 64.86, P < 0.01 respectively) compared to a Type I functional response (adjusted R2 = 0.92, F1,3 = 53.55, P < 0.01; adjusted R2= 0.94, F1,3 = 72.52, P < 0.01). Similarly, the Type II functional response was a better fit when compared to a simple linear increase (adjusted R2 = 0.91, F1,3 = 68.65, P < 0.01; adjusted R2 = 0.92 F1,3 = 77.87, P < 0.01). Lastly, the predicted Type II functional response was a better fit than Type I for both the substrate and non-substrate treatment according to AIC (predicted Type II: substrate AIC = -51.15; non-substrate AIC = -44.96; predicted Type I: substrate AIC = - 31.42; non-substrate AIC = -14.97).
    • Abrams, P. A., 1982. Functional Responses of Optimal Foragers. The American Naturalist 120: 382-390.
    • Aksnes, D. L. & C. W. Utne, 1997. A revised model of visual range in fish. Sarsia 82: 137- 147.
    • Alexander, M. E., J. T. A. Dick & N. E. O'Connor, 2013. Trait-mediated indirect interactions in a marine intertidal system as quantified by functional responses. Oikos 122: 1521-1531.
    • Alexander, M. E., J. T. A. Dick, N. E., O'Connor, N. R. Haddaway & K. Farnsworth, 2012. Functional responses of the intertidal amphipod Echinogammarus marinus: effects of prey supply, model selection and habitat complexity. Marine Ecology Progress Series 468: 191- 202.
    • Allouche, S. & P. Gaudin, 2001. Effects of avian predation threat, water flow and cover on growth and habitat use by chub, Leuciscus cephalus, in an experimental stream. Oikos 94: 481-492.
    • Bollache, L., J. T. A. Dick, K. D. Farnsworth & W. I. Montgomery, 2008. Comparison of the functional responses of invasive and native amphipods. Biology Letters 4: 166-9.
    • Bond, N., D. McMaster, P. Reich, J. R. Thomson & P. S. Lake, 2010. Modelling the impacts of flow regulation on fish distributions in naturally intermittent lowland streams: an approach for predicting restoration responses. Freshwater Biology 55: 1997-2010.
    • Britton, J. R., J. Pegg, D. Baker & C. Williams, 2012. Do lower feeding rates result in reduced growth of a cyprinid fish infected with the Asian tapeworm? Ecology of Freshwater Fish 21: 172-175.
    • Brabrand, A. & B. Faafeng, 1993. Habitat shift in roach (Rutilus rutilus) induced by pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca) introduction: predation risk versus pelagic behaviour. Oecologia 95: 38-46.
    • Buckel, J. A. & A. W. Stoner, 2000. Functional response and switching behavior of youngof-the-year piscivorous bluefish. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 245: 25-41.
    • Chick, J. H. & C. C. McIvor, 1997. Habitat selection by three littoral zone fishes: effects of predation pressure, plant density and macrophyte type. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 6: 27- 35.
    • Copp, G. H.s 1997. Microhabitat use of fish larvae and 0+ juveniles in a highly regulated section of the River Great Ouse. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 13: 267-276.
    • Dick, J. T. A., K. Gallagher, S. Avlijas, H.C. Clarke, S.E. Lewis, S. Leung & A. Ricciardi, 2012. Ecological impacts of an invasive predator explained and predicted by comparative functional responses. Biological Invasions 15: 837-846.
    • Heck, K. L. Jr. & L. B. Crowder, 1991. Habitat structure and predator-prey interactions in vegetated aquatic systems. In Bell, S. S., E. D. McCoy & H. Muchinsky, ed. Habitat Structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. New York: 281 -299.
    • Henson, S. M. & T. G. Hallam, 1995. Optimal feeding via constrained processes. Journal of Theoretical Biology 176: 170-177.
    • Hjelm, J., G. H. van de Weerd & F.A. Sibbing, 2003. Functional link between foraging performance, functional morphology, and diet shift in roach (Rutilus rutilus). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60: 700-709.
    • Ioannou, C. C., C. R. Tosh, L. Neville & J. Krause, 2007. The confusion effect from neural networks to reduced predation risk. Behavioral Ecology 19: 126-130.
    • Jeppesen, E., M. Meerhoff, K. Holmgren, I. González-Bergonzoni, F. Teixeira-de Mello, S. A. J. Declerck, L. Meester, M. Søndergaard, T. L. Lauridsen, R. Bjerring, J. M. CondePorcuna, N. Mazzeo, C. Iglesias, M. Reizenstein, H. J. Malmquist, Z. Liu, D. Balayla & X. Lazzaro, 2010. Impacts of climate warming on lake fish community structure and potential effects on ecosystem function. Hydrobiologia 646: 73-90.
    • Jeschke, J. M. & K. Hohberg, 2008. Predicting and testing functional responses: An example from a tardigrade-nematode system. Basic and Applied Ecology 9: 145-151.
    • Jeschke, J. M., M. Kopp & R. Tollrian, 2002. Predator functional Responses: Discriminating between handling and digesting prey. Ecological Monographs 72: 95-112.
    • Jeschke, J. M., M. Kopp & R. Tollrian, 2004. Consumer-food systems: why Type I functional responses are exclusive to filter feeders. Biological Reviews 79: 337-349.
    • Johansson, L. & L. Persson, 1986. The fish community of temperate eutrophic lakes. In: Riemann, B. & M. Sondergaard, (eds), Carbon dynamics in eutrophic, temper-ate lakes. Elsevier, Amsterdam: 237-266.
    • Warfe, D. M. & L. A. Barmuta, 2004. Habitat structural complexity mediates the foraging success of multiple predator species. Oecologia: 141, 171-178.
    • Werner, E. E, 1974. The Fish Size, Prey Size, Handling Time Relation in Several Sunfishes and Some Implications. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 31: 1531-1536.
    • Werner, E. E., J. F. Gilliam, D. J. Hall & G. G. Mittelbach, 1983. An Experimental Test of the Effects of Predation Risk on Habitat Use in Fish. Ecology 64: 1540-1548.
    • Winkler, H. & C. P. Orellana, 1992. Functional responses of five cyprinid species to planktonic prey. Environmental Biology of Fishes 33: 53-62.
    • Zamor, R. G. & Grossman, 2007. Turbidity Affects Foraging Success of Drift-Feeding Rosyside Dace. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 136: 167-176.
    • 2nd
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article