Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Sageman-Furnas, AO; Goswami, P; Menon, G; Russell, SJ (2014)
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Languages: English
Types: Article
The Sphereprint is introduced as a means to characterize hemispherical conformability, even when buckling occurs, in a variety of flexible materials such as papers, textiles, nonwovens, films, membranes and biological tissues. Conformability is defined here as the ability to fit a doubly curved surface without folding. Applications of conformability range from the fit of a wound dressing, artificial skin, or wearable electronics around a protuberance such as a knee or elbow to geosynthetics used as reinforcements. Conformability of flexible materials is quantified by two dimensionless quantities derived from the Sphereprint. The Sphereprint ratio summarizes how much of the specimen conforms to a hemisphere under symmetric radial loading. The Coefficient of Expansion approximates the average stretching of the specimen during deformation, accounting for hysteresis. Both quantities are reproducible and robust, even though a given material folds differently each time it conforms. For demonstration purposes, an implementation of the Sphereprint test methodology was performed on a collection of cellulosic fibrous assemblies. For this example, the Sphereprint ratio ranked the fabrics according to intuition from least to most conformable in the sequence: paper towel, plain weave, satin weave, and single knit jersey. The Coefficient of Expansion distinguished the single knit jersey from the bark weave fabric, despite them having similar Sphereprint ratios and, as expected, the bark weave stretched less than the single knit jersey did during conformance. This work lays the foundation for engineers to quickly and quantitatively compare the conformance of existing and new flexible materials, no matter their construction.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Amirbayat J, Hearle JWS. The Anatomy of Buckling of Textile Fabrics: Drape and Conformability. J Text Inst. 1989 Jan;80(1):51-70.
    • 2. Chu CC, Cummings CL, Teixeira NA. Mechanics of Elastic Performance of Textile Materials: Part V: A Study of the Factors Affecting the Drape of Fabrics--The Development of a Drape Meter. Text Res J. 1950 Aug 1;20(8):539-548.
    • 3. Cusick GE. The measurement of fabric drape. J Text Inst. 1968 Jun;59(6):253-260.
    • 4. Hearle JWS, Grosberg P, Backer S. Structural mechanics of fibers, yarns, and fabrics. Wiley-Interscience; 1969.
    • 5. Cerda E, Mahadevan L. Geometry and Physics of Wrinkling. Phys Rev Lett. 2003 Feb;90:074302.
    • 6. Cerda E, Mahadevan L, Pasini JM. The elements of draping. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(7):1806-1810.
    • 7. Qiao Li, Xiaoming Tao. A stretchable knitted interconnect for three-dimensional curvilinear surfaces. Text Res J. 2011 Jun 29;81(11):1171-1182.
    • 8. Rogers JA, Someya T, Huang Y. Materials and Mechanics for Stretchable Electronics. Science. 2010;327(5973):1603-1607.
    • 9. Chen N, Engel J, Pandya S, et al. Flexible skin with two-axis bending capability made using weaving-by-lithography fabrication method. Micro Electro Mech Syst, 2006 Istanbul. 19th IEEE Int Conf on. 2006. pp.330-333.
    • 10. Someya T, Kato Y, Sekitani T, et al. Conformable, flexible, large-area networks of pressure and thermal sensors with organic transistor active matrixes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(35):12321-12325.
    • 11. Stoker JJ. Differential Geometry. John Wiley & Sons, New York; 1969. p. 91.
    • 12. Kawabata S, Niwa M. Fabric performance in clothing and clothing manufacture. J Text Inst. 1989;80(1):19-50.
    • 13. Mack C, Taylor HM. The fitting of woven cloth to surfaces. J Text Inst. 1956;47(8):477-488.
    • 14. Tschebyscheff PL. Sur la coupe des vêtements. Assoc franç pour l'avancement des sci., Congrés de Paris. 1878. pp.154-155.
    • 15. Pipkin AC. Equilibrium of Tchebychev nets. Arch Ration Mech Anal. 1984;85(1):81- 97.
    • 16. Ghys É. Sur la coupe des vêtements: variation autour d'un thème de Tchebychev. Enseign Math. 2011;57(1-2):165-208.
    • 17. British Standards. 13726: Non-active medical devices - Test methods for primary wound dressings - Part 4: Conformability. 2003.
    • 18. Shealy OL. Spunbonded Products-A New Concept in Utilization of Fibrous Materials. Text Res J. 1965;35:322-329.
    • 19. Pastore C. Conformability. http://faculty.philau.edu/pastorec/MechTextiles/Conformability.ppt (2010).
    • 20. Cai Z, Yu JZ, Ko FK. Formability of textile preforms for composite applications. Part 2: Evaluation experiments and modelling. Compos Manuf. 1994 Jun;5(2):123-132.
    • 21. Chu TJ, Jiang K, Robertson RE. The use of friction in the shaping of a flat sheet into a hemisphere. Polym Compos. 1996;17(3):458-467.
    • 22. Hu J, Jiang Y. Modeling formability of multiaxial warp knitted fabrics on a hemisphere. Composites Part A. 2002 May;33(5):725-734.
    • 23. Lin H, Wang J, Long AC, et al. Predictive modelling for optimization of textile composite forming. Compos Sci Technol. 2007 Dec;67(15-16):3242-3252.
    • 24. Mallon PJ, O'Brádaigh CM, Pipes RB. Polymeric diaphragm forming of complexcurvature thermoplastic composite parts. Composites. 1989;20(1):48-56.
    • 25. Robertson RE, Hsiue ES, Sickafus EN, et al. Fiber rearrangements during the molding of continuous fiber composites. I. Flat cloth to a hemisphere. Polym Compos. 1981 Jul;2(3):126-131.
    • 26. Rozant O, Bourban PE, Månson JAE. Drapability of dry textile fabrics for stampable thermoplastic preforms. Composites Part A. 2000 Nov;31(11):1167-1177.
    • 27. Aono M, Breen DE, Wozny MJ. Modeling methods for the design of 3D broadcloth composite parts. Comput-Aided Des. 2001 Nov;33(13):989-1007.
    • 42 ± 1 / 34 ± 1 2x1 weave 24 ± 1 / 21 ± 1 1x1 weave 30 ± 1 / 19 ± 1 1x1 weave 53 ± 2 / 18 ± 1 4x1 weave 30 ± 1 / 15 ± 1 bark weave 13 ± 1 / 11 ± 1 course/wale per cm
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

  • NSF | CAREER: Scaling and self-si...

Cite this article