Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Woolf, Anne; Ansley, Les; Bidgood, Penelope (2007)
Publisher: Walter de Gruyter
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: C600
The 10 disciplines in the decathlon can be broadly characterised as running, jumping and throwing. However, these simplistic characteristics may not represent the groupings defined by performances in the decathlon. The identification of groups may reveal a recondite advantage for athletes who excel in particular disciplines. Therefore this study used cluster analysis to determine the groupings inherent within the decathlon disciplines. The data set was derived from the top 173 decathletes between the years 1986 to 2005. Six clustering methods were applied to a Euclidean proximity matrix. The highest number of clusters common to all the methods was accepted as the solution. All six methods produced the same 3-cluster ([100m 400m 110H LJ PV HJ][SP DT JT][1500m]), 4-cluster ([100m 400m 110H LJ PV][SP DT JT][HJ][1500m]) and 5-cluster ([100m 400m 110mH LJ][SP DT JT][PV][HJ][1500m]) solutions. Stability tests confirmed the consistency of all the solutions. The 10 disciplines of the decathlon form into five groupings, which can be adequately explained from a physiological perspective. The clustering suggests that athletes who perform better at the sprint/track disciplines may obtain an advantage in the decathlon.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Cox, T.F. & Dunn, R.T. (2002). An analysis of decathlon data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D, 51, 179-187.
    • Cromwell, D.B. (1949). Champion Technique in Track and Field (2nd ed). New York, Whittlesey House.
    • Dapena, J. & Chung, C.S. (1988). Vertical and radial motions of the body during the take-off phase of high jumping. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 20, 290-302.
    • Matthews, P. (2005). International Athletics Annual 1995. Cheltenham: SportsBooks.
    • Van Damme, R., Wilson, R. S., Vanhooydonck B. & Aerts, P. (2002). Evolutionary biology: Performance constraints in decathletes. Nature, 415, 755.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article