LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Hyland, Philip; Shevlin, Mark; Adamson, Gary; Boduszek, Daniel (2014)
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: BF, H1

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: humanities, macromolecular substances
Background: Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy (REBT) assumes that rational beliefs act as cognitive protective factors against the development of psychopathology however little\ud empirical evidence exists regarding the nature of the possible protective effects offer by rational beliefs. \ud Aims: The current study investigates whether rational beliefs serve to moderate the impact of irrational beliefs on posttraumatic stress symptomology(PTS). \ud Method: Three hundred and thirteen (N = 313) active law enforcement, military, and related emergency service personnel took part in the current study. Sequential moderated multiple regression analysis was employed to investigate (i) the direct impact of irrational beliefs on PTS, (ii) the direct impact of rational beliefs on PTS, (iii) the moderating effects of rational beliefs in the relationship between irrational beliefs and PTS. \ud Results: The irrational beliefs predicted by REBT theory emerged as critical predictors of PTS symptomology, in particular Depreciation beliefs. Rational beliefs (Preferences, and Acceptance beliefs) had a direct, negative impact on levels of PTS, and Acceptance beliefs moderated the impact of Catastrophizing beliefs on PTS. Conclusions: Irrational beliefs are important cognitive vulnerability factors in symptoms of PTS, while rational beliefs (Acceptance) appear to have a protective role in the emergence of PTS symptoms both directly and by moderating the impact of Catastrophizing beliefs.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Zlotnick C., Johnson, J., Kohn, R., Vicente, B., Rioseco, P., & Saldiva, S. (2006). Page 31 of 31
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article