LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Jones, A. M.; Lomas, J.; Moore, P.; Rice, N. (2013)
Types: Article
Subjects: Health econometrics; healthcare costs; heavy tails; quasi-Monte Carlo
jel: jel:C1, jel:C5
We conduct a quasi-Monte Carlo comparison of the recent developments in parametric and semi-parametric regression methods for healthcare costs against each other and against standard practice. The population of English NHS hospital inpatient episodes for the nancial year 2007-2008 (summed for each patient: 6,164,114 observations in total) is randomly divided into two equally sized sub-populations to form an estimation and a validation set. Evaluating out-of-sample using the validaton set, a conditional density estimator shows considerable promise in forecasting conditional means, performing best for accuracy of forecasting and amongst the best four (of sixteen compared) for bias and goodness-of- t. The best performing model for bias is linear regression with square root transformed dependent variable, and a generalised linear model with square root link function and Poisson distribution performs best in terms of goodness-of- t. Commonly used models utilising a log-link are shown to perform badly relative to other models considered in our comparison.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Arrow, K. J. and Lind, R. C. (1970) Uncertainty and the evaluation of public investment decisions. Am. Econ. Rev., 60, 364-378.
    • Basu, A., Arondekar, B. V. and Rathouz, P. J. (2006) Scale of interest versus scale of estimation: comparing alternative estimators for the incremental costs of a comorbidity. Hlth Econ., 15, 1091-1107.
    • Basu, A., Manning, W. G. and Mullahy, J. (2004) Comparing alternative models: log vs Cox proportional hazard? Hlth Econ., 13, 749-765.
    • Basu, A. and Rathouz, P. J. (2005) Estimating marginal and incremental effects on health outcomes using flexible link and variance function models. Biostatistics, 6, 93-109.
    • Blough, D. K., Madden, C. W. and Hornbrook, M. C. (1999) Modeling risk using generalized linear models. J. Hlth Econ., 18, 153-171.
    • Bordley, R., McDonald, J. and Mantrala, A. (1997) Something new, something old: parametric models for the size of distribution of income. J. Incm. Distribn, 6, 91-103.
    • Buntin, M. B. and Zaslavsky, A. M. (2004) Too much ado about two-part models and transformation?: comparing methods of modeling medicare expenditures. J. Hlth Econ., 23, 525-542.
    • Cawley, J. and Meyerhoefer, C. (2012) The medical care costs of obesity: an instrumental variables approach. J. Hlth Econ., 31, 219-230.
    • Copas, J. B. (1983) Regression, prediction and shrinkage (with discussion). J. R. Statist Soc. B, 45, 311-354.
    • Cummins, J. D., Dionne, G., McDonald, J. B. and Pritchett, B. M. (1990) Applications of the GB2 family of distributions in modeling insurance loss processes. Insur. Math. Econ., 9, 257-272.
    • Deb, P. and Burgess, J. F. (2003) A quasi-experimental comparison of econometric models for health care expenditures. (Available from http://econ.hunter.cuny.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/b/ RePEc/papers/HunterEconWP212.pdf.)
    • Deb, P. and Trivedi, P. K. (1997) Demand for medical care by the elderly: a finite mixture approach. J. Appl. Econmetr., 12, 313-336.
    • Dixon, J., Smith, P., Gravelle, H., Martin, S., Bardsley, M., Rice, N., Georghiou, T., Dusheiko, M., Billings, J., Lorenzo, M. D. and Sanderson, C. (2011) A person based formula for allocating commissioning funds to general practices in England: development of a statistical model. Br. Med. J., 343, article d6608.
    • Duan, N. (1983) Smearing estimate: a nonparametric retransformation method. J. Am. Statist. Ass., 78, 605-610.
    • Duan, N., Manning, W. G., Morris, C. N. and Newhouse, J. P. (1983) A comparison of alternative models for the demand for medical care. J. Bus. Econ. Statist., 1, 115-126.
    • Gilleskie, D. B. and Mroz, T. A. (2004) A flexible approach for estimating the effects of covariates on health expenditures. J. Hlth Econ., 23, 391-418.
    • Han, A. and Hausman, J. A. (1990) Flexible parametric estimation of duration and competing risk models. J. Appl. Econmetr., 5, 1-28.
    • Heckman, J. J. (2001) Micro data, heterogeneity, and the evaluation of public policy: Nobel lecture. J. Polit. Econ., 109, 673-748.
    • Hill, S. C. and Miller, G. E. (2010) Health expenditure estimation and functional form: applications of the generalized gamma and extended estimating equations models. Hlth Econ., 19, 608-627.
    • Hoch, J. S., Briggs, A. H. and Willan, A. R. (2002) Something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue: a framework for the marriage of health econometrics and cost-effectiveness analysis. Hlth Econ., 11, 415- 430.
    • Holly, A. (2009) Modeling risk using fourth order pseudo maximum likelihood methods. Institute of Health Economics and Management, University of Lausanne, Lausanne.
    • Holly, A., Monfort, A. and Rockinger, M. (2011) Fourth order pseudo maximum likelihood methods. J. Econmetr., 162, 278-293.
    • Holly, A. and Pentsak, Y. (2006) Maximum likelihood estimation of the conditional mean e.y|x/ for skewed dependent variables in four-parameter families of distribution. Technical Report. Institute of Health Economics and Management, University of Lausanne, Lausanne.
    • Huber, M., Lechner, M. and Wunsch, C. (2013) The performance of estimators based on the propensity score. J. Econmetr., 175, 1-21.
    • Johnson, E., Dominici, F., Griswold, M. and Zeger, S. L. (2003) Disease cases and their medical costs attributable to smoking: an analysis of the national medical expenditure survey. J. Econmetr., 112, 135-151.
    • Jones, A. M. (2011) Models for health care. In Oxford Handbook of Economic Forecasting (eds M. P. Clements and D. F. Hendry). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Jones, A. M., Lomas, J. and Rice, N. (2014) Applying beta-type size distributions to healthcare cost regressions. J. Appl. Econmetr., 29, 649-670.
    • Jones, A. M., Lomas, J. and Rice, N. (2015) Healthcare cost regressions: going beyond the mean to estimate the full distribution. Hlth Econ., to be published, doi 10.1002/hec.3178.
    • Manning, W. G., Basu, A. and Mullahy, J. (2005) Generalized modeling approaches to risk adjustment of skewed outcomes data. J. Hlth Econ., 24, 465-488.
    • Manning, W. G., Duan, N. and Rogers, W. (1987) Monte Carlo evidence on the choice between sample selection and two-part models. J. Econmetr., 35, 59-82.
    • McDonald, J. B., Sorensen, J. and Turley, P. A. (2013) Skewness and kurtosis properties of income distribution models. Rev. Incm. Wlth, 59, 360-374.
    • Mihaylova, B., Briggs, A., O'Hagan, A. and Thompson, S. G. (2011) Review of statistical methods for analysing healthcare resources and costs. Hlth Econ., 20, 897-916.
    • Mullahy, J. (1997) Heterogeneity, excess zeros, and the structure of count data models. J. Appl. Econmetr., 12, 337-350.
    • Mullahy, J. (2009) Econometric modeling of health care costs and expenditures: a survey of analytical issues and related policy considerations. Med. Care, 47, suppl. 1, S104-S108.
    • Pentsak, Y. (2007) Addressing skewness and kurtosis in health care econometrics. PhD Thesis. University of Lausanne, Lausanne.
    • Vanness, D. J. and Mullahy, J. (2007) Perspectives on mean-based evaluation of health care. In The Elgar Companion to Health Economics (ed. A. M. Jones). Cheltenham. Elgar.
    • Van de Ven, W. P. and Ellis, R. P. (2000) Risk adjustment in competitive health plan markets. In Handbook of Health Economics, vol. 1 (eds A. J. Culyer and J. P. Newhouse), ch. 14, pp. 755-845. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    • Veazie, P. J., Manning, W. G. and Kane, R. L. (2003) Improving risk adjustment for medicare capitated reimbursement using nonlinear models. Med. Care, 41, 741-752.
    • World Health Oraganization (2007) International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
    53
    53%
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article