LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
O'Shea, Tom (2017)
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
This article develops a civic republican approach to medical ethics. It outlines civic republican concerns about the domination that arises from subjection to an arbitrary power of interference, while suggesting republican remedies to such domination in healthcare. These include proposals for greater review, challenge, and pre-authorisation of medical power. It extends this analysis by providing a civic republican account of assistive arbitrary power, showing how it can create similar problems within both formal and informal relationships of care, and offering strategies for tackling it. Two important objections to civic republican medical ethics — that it overvalues independence and political participation in healthcare — are also considered and rebutted.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • disability. Disabil Soc 2014;29(3):402 16. J Appl Philos 2015. doi:10.1111/japp.12149 3 Jennings B. Public health and civic republicanism: toward an alternative framework for public health ethics. In: Dawson A, Verweij M, eds. Ethics, Prevention, and Public Health. Oxford: Clarendon Press 2007:30-58.
    • 4 Radoilska L. Public health ethics and liberalism. Public Health Ethics 2009;2(2):135-45.
    • 5 De Wispelaere J, Coggon J, eds. Republican special symposium. Public Health Ethics 2016;9(2):123-82.
    • 6 Skinner Q. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997.
    • 7 Pettit P. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1997.
    • 8 Honohan I. Civic Republicanism. London: Routledge 2002.
    • 9 Laborde C, Maynor J, eds. Republicanism and Political Theory. Oxford: Blackwell 2008.
    • 10 Lovett F. A General Theory of Domination and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010:119.
    • 11 Lovett. Domination and Justice. 50.
    • 12 Lovett F. What counts as arbitrary power? Journal of Political Power 2012;5(1).
    • 28 Macintyre A. Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. Chicago: Open Court 1999: 119f.
    • 29 Cobb A. Acknowledged dependence and the virtues of perinatal hospice. J Med Philos 2016;41(1): 29.
    • 30 Friedman M. Pet Maynor J, eds. Republicanism and Political Theory. Oxford: Blackwell 2008:254-5.
    • 31 Latham SR. Political theory, values and public health. Public Health Ethics 2016;9(2):144.
    • 32 Latham. Political theory, values and public health. 147.
    • 33 Celikates R. Freedom as non-arbitrariness or as democratic self-rule? A critique of contemporary republicanism. In: Dahl C, Nexø A, eds. To Be Unfree: Republican Perspectives on Political Unfreedom in History, Literature, and Philosophy. Bielefeld: Transcript 2014.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article