Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Preece, S; Goulermas, JY; Kenney, LPJ; Howard, D
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: RZ, health_and_wellbeing
Driven by the demands on healthcare resulting from the shift toward more sedentary lifestyles, considerable effort has been devoted to the monitoring and classification of human activity. In previous studies, various classification schemes and feature extraction methods have been used to identify different activities from a range of different datasets. In this paper,we present a comparison of 14 methods to extract classification features from accelerometer signals. These are based on the wavelet transform and other well-known time- and frequency-domain signal characteristics. To allow an objective comparison between the different features, we used two datasets of activities collected from 20 subjects. The first set comprised three commonly used activities, namely, level walking, stair ascent, and stair descent, and the second a total of eight activities. Furthermore, we compared the classification accuracy for each feature set across different combinations of three different accelerometer placements. The classification analysis has been performed with robust subject-based cross-validation methods using a nearest-neighbor classifier. The findings show that, although the wavelet transform approach can be used to characterize non-stationary signals, it does not perform as accurately as frequency-based features when classifying dynamic activities performed by healthy subjects. Overall, the best feature sets achieved over 95% inter-subject classification accuracy.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] K. Aminian and B. Najafi, “Capturing human motion using body-fixed sensors: Outdoor measurement and clinical applications,” Comput. Anim. Virtual Worlds, vol. 15, pp. 79-94, 2004.
    • [2] W. Zjlstra and K. Aminian, “Mobility assessment in older people: New possibilities and challenges,” Eur. J. Aging, vol. 4, pp. 3-12, 2007.
    • [3] World Health Organization Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2004.
    • [4] R. A. Washburn and H. J. Montoye, “The assessment of physical activity by questionnaire,” Amer. J. Epidemiol., vol. 123, pp. 563-576, 1986.
    • [5] B. E. Ainsworth, D. R. Jacobs, Jr., and A. S. Leon, “Validity and reliability of self-reported physical activity status: The lipid research clinics questionnaire,” Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., vol. 25, pp. 92-98, 1993.
    • [6] C. J. Riddoch, C. Mattocks, K. Deere, J. Saunders, J. Kirkby, K. Tilling, S. D. Leary, S. N. Blair, and A. R. Ness, “Objective measurement of levels and patterns of physical activity,” Arch. Dis. Child., vol. 92, pp. 963-969, 2007.
    • [7] R. R. Pate, K. A. Pfeiffer, S. G. Trost, P. Ziegler, and M. Dowda, “Physical activity among children attending preschools,” Pediatrics, vol. 114, pp. 1258-1263, 2004.
    • [8] B. Najafi, K. Aminian, F. Loew, Y. Blanc, and P. A. Robert, “Measurement of stand-sit and sit-stand transitions using a miniature gyroscope and its application in fall risk evaluation in the elderly,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 843-851, Aug. 2002.
    • [9] N. Streitz and P. Nixon, “The disappearing computer,” Commun. ACM, vol. 48, pp. 32-35, 2005.
    • [10] J. Coutaz, J. L. Crowley, S. Dobson, and D. Garlan, “Context is key,” Commun. ACM, vol. 48, pp. 49-53, 2005.
    • [11] L. Bao and S. S. Intille, “Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data,” Pers Comput., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3001, pp. 1-17, 2004.
    • [12] U. Maurer, A. Rowe, A. Smailagic, and D. Siewiorek, “Location and activity recognition using eWatch: A wearable sensor platform,” Ambient Intell. Everday Life, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3864, pp. 86- 102, 2006.
    • [13] J. Parkka, M. Ermes, P. Korpipaa, J. Mantyjarvi, J. Peltola, and I. Korhonen, “Activity classification using realistic data from wearable sensors,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 119-128, Jan. 2006.
    • [14] N. Wang, E. Ambikairajah, N. H. Lovell, and B. G. Celler, “Accelerometry based classification of walking patterns using time-frequency analysis,” in Proc. 29th Annu. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., Lyon, France, 2007, pp. 4899-4902.
    • [15] S. J. Preece, J. Y. Goulermas, L. P. J. Kenney, K. Meijer, R. H. Crompton, and D. Howard, “Activity identification using body-mounted sensorsa review of classification techniques,” Physiol. Meas., 2008, to be published.
    • [16] J. Fahrenberg, F. Foerster, M. Smeja, and W. Muller, “Assessment of posture and motion by multichannel piezoresistive accelerometer recordings,” Psychophysiology, vol. 34, pp. 607-612, 1997.
    • [17] J. Fahrenberg, W. Muller, F. Foerster, and M. Smeja, “A multi-channel investigation of physical activity,” Psychophysiology, vol. 10, pp. 209- 217, 1996.
    • [18] F. R. Allen, E. Ambikairajah, N. H. Lovell, and B. G. Celler, “Classification of a known sequence of motions and postures from accelerometry data using adapted Gaussian mixture models,” Physiol. Meas., vol. 27, pp. 935-951, 2006.
    • [19] T. Prill and J. Fahrenberg, “Simultaneous assessment of posture and limb movements (e.g., periodic leg movements) with calibrated multiple accelerometry,” Physiol. Meas., vol. 27, pp. N47-N53, 2006.
    • [20] S. J. Preece, J. Y. Goulermas, L. P. J. Kenney, and D. Howard, “A comparison of different feature generation methods in activity classification,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Ambul. Monit. Phys. Act. Movement, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2008, p. 87.
    • [21] M. Sekine, T. Tamura, M. Akay, T. Fujimoto, T. Togawa, and Y. Fukui, “Discrimination of walking patterns using wavelet-based fractal analysis,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 188-196, Sep. 2002.
    • [22] M. Sekine, T. Tamura, T. Togawa, and Y. Fukui, “Classification of waistacceleration signals in a continuous walking record,” Med. Eng. Phys., vol. 22, pp. 285-291, 2000.
    • [23] T. Tamura, M. Sekine, M. Ogawa, T. Togawa, and Y. Fukui, “Classification of acceleration waveforms during walking by wavelet transform,” Methods Inf. Med., vol. 36, pp. 356-359, 1997.
    • [24] M. N. Nyan, F. E. Tay, K. H. Seah, and Y. Y. Sitoh, “Classification of gait patterns in the time-frequency domain,” J. Biomech., vol. 39, pp. 2647- 2656, 2006.
    • [25] S. Mallat and W. L. Hwang, “Singularity detection and processing with wavelets,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 617-643, Mar. 1992.
    • [26] C. V. C. Bouten, K. T. M. Koekkoek, M. Verduin, R. Kodde, and J. D. Janssen, “A triaxial accelerometer and portable data processing unit for the assessment of daily physical activity,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 136-147, Mar. 1997.
    • [27] E. A. Heinz, K. S. Kunze, S. Sulistyo, H. Junker, P. Lukowicz, and G. Troster, “Experimental evaluation of variations in primary features used for accelerometric context recognition,” Ambient Intell., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2875, pp. 252-263, 2003.
    • [28] M. J. Mathie, A. C. Coster, N. H. Lovell, and B. G. Celler, “Detection of daily physical activities using a triaxial accelerometer,” Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., vol. 41, pp. 296-301, 2003.
    • [29] H. B. Bussmann, P. J. Reuvekamp, P. H. Veltink, W. L. Martens, and H. J. Stam, “Validity and reliability of measurements obtained with an “activity monitor” in people with and without a transtibial amputation,” Phys. Ther., vol. 78, pp. 989-998, 1998.
    • [30] K. Aminian, P. Robert, E. E. Buchser, B. Rutschmann, D. Hayoz, and M. Depairon, “Physical activity monitoring based on accelerometry: Validation and comparison with video observation,” Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., vol. 37, pp. 304-308, 1999.
    • [31] J. B. J. Bussmann, Y. M. van de Laar, M. P. Neeleman, and H. J. Stam, “Ambulatory accelerometry to quantify motor behaviour in patients after failed back surgery: A validation study,” Pain, vol. 74, pp. 153-161, 1998.
    • [32] B. Najafi, K. Aminian, A. Paraschiv-Ionescu, F. Loew, C. J. Bula, and P. Robert, “Ambulatory system for human motion analysis using a kinematic sensor: Monitoring of daily physical activity in the elderly,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 711-723, Jun. 2003.
    • [33] M. Ermes, J. Parkka, J. Mantyjarvi, and I. Korhonen, “Detection of daily activities and sports with wearable sensors in controlled and uncontrolled conditions,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 20-26, Jan. 2008.
    • [34] P. Pirttikangas, K. Fujinami, and T. Nakajima, “Feature selection and activity recognition from wearable sensors,” Ubiquitous Comput. Syst., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4239, pp. 516-527, 2006.
    • [35] F. Foerster and J. Fahrenberg, “Motion pattern and posture: Correctly assessed by calibrated accelerometers,” Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput., vol. 32, pp. 450-457, 2000.
    • [36] K. Zhang, P. Werner, M. Sun, F. X. Pi-Sunyer, and C. N. Boozer, “Measurement of human daily physical activity,” Obes. Res., vol. 11, pp. 33-40, 2003.
    • [37] T. Huynh and B. Schiele, “Analyzing features for activity recognition,” in Proc. Conf. Smart Objects Ambient Intell.: Innov. Context-Aware Serv.: Usages Technol., Grenoble, France, 2005, pp. 159-164.
    • [38] K. van Laerhoven and O. Cakmakci, “What shall we teach our pants?,” in Proc. 4th Int. Symp. Wearable Comput., 2000, pp. 77-83.
    • [39] S. G. Mallat, “A thoery for multi-resolution signal decomposition: The wavelet representation,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 674-693, Jul. 1989.
    • [40] T. Chau, “A review of analytical techniques for gait data. Part 2: Neural network and wavelet methods,” Gait Posture, vol. 13, pp. 102-120, 2001.
    • [41] B. B. Mandelbrot, The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York: Freeman, 1983.
    • [42] D. M. Karantonis, M. R. Narayanan, M. Mathie, N. H. Lovell, and B. G. Celler, “Implementation of a real-time human movement classifier using a triaxial accelerometer for ambulatory monitoring,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 156-167, Jan. 2006.
    • [43] A. Sugimoto, Y. Hara, T. W. Findley, and K. Yoncmoto, “A useful method for measuring daily physical activity by a three-direction monitor,” Scand. J. Rehabil. Med., vol. 29, pp. 37-42, 1997.
    • [44] R. O. Duda, P. E. Hart, and D. G. Stork, Pattern Classification, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 2001. Stephen J. Preece received the B.Sc. degree in physics in 1996 and the Ph.D. degree in applied mathematics in 2001, both from the University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K. He has been engaged in research on a range of biomedical engineering projects. He is currently a Postdoctoral Research Fellow in the field of human performance research at the University of Salford, Salford, U.K. His current research interests include algorithm development in activity monitoring and electromyography methodology for characterizing lower limb muscle function during gait. John Yannis Goulermas (S'98-M'98) received the B.Sc. (Hons, First Class) degree in computation in 1994 from the University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology (UMIST), Manchester, U.K., and the M.Sc. degree by research in 1996 and the Ph.D. degree in 2000, both from the Department of Electrical Engineering, where he worked in the field of on machine vision. He has been a Scientific Developer in industry and a Postdoctoral Researcher in virtual reality and biomechanics. He joined the Department of Electrical Engineering and Electronics of the University of Liverpool, Liverpool, U.K., in 2005. His current research interests include pattern recognition, optimization, and image analysis, with applications in biomedical engineering and industrial monitoring.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article