LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Muelaner, J.E.; Yang, B.R.; Davy, C.; Verma, M.R.; Maropoulos, P.G. (2014)
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Journal: Procedia CIRP
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Machine tool calibration, Machine tool verification, On-machine probing

This paper describes work carried out to develop methods of verifying that machine tools are capable of machining parts to within specification, immediately before carrying out critical material removal operations, and with negligible impact on process times. A review of machine tool calibration and verification technologies identified that current techniques were not suitable due to requirements for significant time and skilled human intervention. A 'solution toolkit' is presented consisting of a selection circular tests and artefact probing which are able to rapidly verify the kinematic errors and in some cases also dynamic errors for different types of machine tool, as well as supplementary methods for tool and spindle error detection. A novel artefact probing process is introduced which simplifies data processing so that the process can be readily automated using only the native machine tool controller. Laboratory testing and industrial case studies are described which demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach.

  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] Kwon, Y., Y.M. Ertekin, and B. Tseng, In-process and post-process quantification of machining accuracy in circular CNC milling. Machining Science and Technology, 2005. 9(Compendex): p. 27-38.
    • [2] Schlesinger, G., F. Koenigsberger, and M. Burdekin, Testing Machine Tools. 1978, London: Machinery Publishing Co.
    • [3] ISO, Test code for machine tools - Part 1: Geometric accuracy of machines operating under no-load or finishing conditions, in ISO 230-1. 1996.
    • [4] Schwenke, H., W. Knapp, H. Haitjema, A. Weckenmann, R. Schmitt, and F. Delbressine, Geometric measurement and compensation of machine - An update. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 2008. 57: p. 660- 675.
    • [5] ISO, Test code for machine tools - Part 2: Determination of accuracy and repeatability of positioning numerically controlled axes, in ISO 230- 2. 2006.
    • [6] ISO, Test code for machine tools - Part 9: Estimation of measurement uncertainty for machine tool tests, in ISO 230-9. 2005.
    • [7] Automated Precision Inc. XD Laser. 2013 [cited; Available from: http://www.apisensor.com/xd-laser.
    • [8] Etalon. Applied Traceability. 2008 [cited 2008 10th November]; Home Page]. Available from: http://www.etalon-ag.com/.
    • [9] Choi, J.P., B.K. Min, and S.J. Lee, Reduction of machining errors of a three-axis machine tool by on-machine measurement and error compensation system. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2004. 155-156(Compendex): p. 2056-2064.
    • [10] ISO, Test code for machine tools - Part 4: Circular tests for numerically controlled machine tools, in ISO 230-4. 2005.
    • [11] Lei, W.T., M.P. Sung, W.L. Liu, and Y.C. Chuang, Double ballbar test for the rotary axes of five-axis CNC machine tools. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2007. 47(Compendex): p. 273-285.
    • [12] Akinori, S., Measuring method of geometric error of turning shaft, 2004, patent number: JP2004219132
    • [13] Kam, L., On-machine ballbar system and method for using the same, 1997, patent number: WO9718436
    • [14] Chen, C.-K., W.-Y. Jywe, and C.-H. Liu. Several newly developed contouring systems for testing the dynamic performance and geometric errors of CNC machine tools. in Proceedings of the second International Symposium on Instrumentation Science and Technology, August 18, 2002 - August 22, 2002. 2002. Jinan, China: Harbin Institute of Technology.
    • [15] Jywe, W.-Y. and C.-H. Liu. A study of geometric error measurement of cnc machine tools using the improved planar encoder system. in 2003 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, September 2, 2003 - September 6, 2003. 2003. Chicago, IL, United states: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
    • [16] Lei, W.T. and Y.Y. Hsu, Accuracy test of five-axis CNC machine tool with 3D probe-ball. Part I: Design and modeling. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2002. 42(Compendex): p. 1153-1162.
    • [17] Lei, W.T. and Y.Y. Hsu, Accuracy test of five-axis CNC machine tool with 3D probe-ball. Part II: Errors estimation. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2002. 42(Compendex): p. 1163-1170.
    • [18] Lei, W.T. and Y.Y. Hsu, Error measurement of five-axis CNC machines with 3D probe-ball. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2003. 139(Compendex): p. 127-133.
    • [19] Trapet, E., J.-J. Aguilar Martin, J.-A. Yague, H. Spaan, and V. Zeleny, Self-centering probes with parallel kinematics to verify machine-tools. Precision Engineering, 2006. 30: p. 165-179.
    • [20] Yague, J.A., J. Velazquez, J.A. Albajez, J.J. Aguilar, M.A. Lope, and J. Santolaria, Development and calibration of self-centring probes for assessing geometrical errors of machines. Measurement Science and Technology, 2009. 20(Compendex).
    • [21] Yague, J.-A., J.-J. Aguilar, J.-A. Albajez, and J. Santolaria, Characterisation of 1D opto-electronic sensors and their application to angular self-centring probes for machine-tool verification. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 2008. 41(Compendex): p. 1113-1123.
    • [22] Florussen, G.H.J. and H.A.M. Spaan. Dynamic R-test for rotary tables on 5-axes machine tools. 2012. Zurich, Switzerland: Elsevier.
    • [23] IBS Precision Engineering. IBS - Rotary axis inspector. 2013 [cited 10th April 2013]; Available from: http://www.ibspe.com/category/machine-tool-inspection-and-analyzersolutions/rotary-axis-inspector.htm.
    • [24] Bozich, D., In-line probing for process improvement. Quality, 2006. 45(Compendex): p. 52-56.
    • [25] Abdul, W.K., C. Wuyi, and W. Lili. Machine tools error characterization compensation by on-line measurement of artifact. in International Conference on Optical Instruments and Technology - Optoelectronic Measurement Technology and Systems. 2009. Shanghai, China: SPIE.
    • [26] Bozich, D., Artifact probing unlocks higher machining accuracies. Manufacturing Engineering, 2004. 133(Compendex).
    • [27] Hellier, Method for Measuring an Object, 2009, patent number: US2009235547
    • [28] ISO, Test conditions for machining centres - Part 7: Accuracy of a finished test piece, in 10791-7. 1998.
    • [29] Tlustry, J., System and methods for testing machine tools Microtechnic 1959. 13(162).
    • [30] IBS Precision Engineering. IBS - Spindle Inspector. 2013 [cited 2013 16th April]; Available from: http://www.ibspe.com/category/machinetool-inspection-and-analyzer-solutions/spindle-inspector.htm.
    • [31] Gordon, L., Probing for productivity. American Machinist, 2005. 149: p. 36-41.
    • [32] Lee, E.S., C.H. Lee, and S.C. Kim, Machining accuracy improvement by automatic tool setting and on machine verification. Key Engineering Materials, 2008. 381-382: p. 199-202.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

Cite this article