Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Parker, Eleanor Susan
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: HQ
This thesis explores the meaning and significance of sibling and peer relationships for young people looked after by local authorities, from their own perspectives. A sociological approach to research with young people is employed, drawing on additional post structural and feminist insights. It is argued that hegemonic ideas concerning the nature of development have resulted in a concentration on adult and adult-child relationships, from adult perspectives. Accordingly, children‟s perspectives on the contribution of their interrelationships to their well-being, support networks, and sense of social inclusion have not been adequately theorised. It is concluded that this has had particular implications for looked after children, as the process of becoming and remaining looked after can result in considerable losses within their sibling and peer relationships.\ud A participatory methodology was developed in order to address issues of power, agency and choice within the research process. Qualitative interviews were undertaken with eighteen young people, aged between twelve and nineteen, who were, or had previously been, looked after. Sibling and peer relationships were found to make significant contributions to the young people‟s emotional and physical well-being, and sense of individual and familial identity, as well as providing emotional and practical support into adulthood. Accordingly, the loss of significant relationships, particularly those with siblings, could affect them deeply.\ud While living in care, the young people were often optimistic about the ease of negotiating relationships with siblings and friends after leaving care. However, in reality, living independently could amplify problems within sibling and peer relationships, placing young people at risk of homelessness, violence, and social isolation.\ud This thesis contributes greater understanding of the importance of a wide variety of sibling and peer relationships to the lives of looked after children, from their own perspectives. It also informs as to the complex challenges they face both during and after leaving care in negotiating their sibling and peer relationships in the interests of their emotional and physical well-being.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Smith, C. and Logan, J. (2004) After Adoption: Direct contact and relationships. London: Routledge.
    • Social Exclusion Task Force (2009) Realising young potential: supporting care leavers into education, employment and training. London: Cabinet Office.
    • Stalker, S. and Connors, K. (2003) Communicating with disabled children. Adoption & Fostering, 27(1), pp. 26-35.
    • Stalker, K. and Connors, C. (2004) Children's perceptions of their disabled siblings: 'she's different but it's normal for us'. Children & Society 18(3), pp. 218-230.
    • Standing, K. (1998) Writing the voices of the Less Powerful: Research on Lone Mothers. In: Ribbens, J. and Edwards, R., eds. Feminist Dilemmas in Qualitative Research: Public Knowledge and Private Lives. London: Sage, pp. 186-202.
    • Stein, M. (2004) What works for young people leaving care? 2nd ed. Ilford: Barnardos.
    • Stein, M. and Carey, K. (1986) Leaving Care. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Stewart, K. (2009) „A scar on the soul of Britain‟: child poverty and disadvantage under New Labour. In: Hills, J., Sefton, T. and Stewart, K., eds. Towards A More Equal Society? Poverty, Inequality and Policy since 1997. Bristol: The Policy Press, pp 47- 70.
    • Stewart, D. Shamdasani, P. and Rook, D. (2007) Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
    • Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1994) Grounded Theory Methodology: An overview. In: Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y., eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications, pp. 273-285.
    • Tarren-Sweeney, M. and Hazell, P. (2005) The mental health and socialization of siblings in care. Children and Youth Services Review 27(7), pp. 821-843.
    • Taylor, C. (2004a) Social Work and Looked-After Children. In: Smith, D., ed. Social Work and Evidence-Based Practice. London: Jessica Kingsley, pp. 127-142. (Research Highlights in Social Work 45.)
    • Taylor, C. (2004b) Underpinning knowledge for child care practice: reconsidering child development theory. Child & Family Social Work, 9(3), pp. 225-235.
    • The Prince‟s Trust (2002) The way it is: young people on race, school exclusion and leaving care. London: The Prince‟s Trust.
    • Thoburn, J. (2004) Post-placement contact between birth parents and older children: the evidence from a longitudinal study of minority ethnic children. In: Neil, E. and Howe, D., eds. Contact in adoption and permanent foster care: Research, theory and practice. London: BAAF, pp. 184-202.
    • Timms, J. and Thoburn, J. (2003) Your Shout! A Survey of the Views of 706 Children and Young People in Public Care. London: NSPCC.
    • Treacher, A. and Katz, I. (2001) Narrative and fantasy in adoption. Adoption & Fostering, 25(3), pp. 20-28.
    • Trinder, L. (2000) Reading the texts. In: Fawcett, B., Featherstone, B., Fook, J..and Rossiter, A., eds. Practice + Research in Social Work Post Modern Perspectives. London: Routledge, pp. 39-61.
    • UNICEF (2002) Children Participating in Research, Monitoring And Evaluation (M&E) - Ethics and Your Responsibilities as a Manager. New York: UNICEF Evaluation Office. (Evaluation Technical Notes No. 1.).
    • United Nations General Assembly (1989) Convention on the Rights of the Child. Geneva: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.
    • Unrau, Y. (2007) Research on placement moves: Seeking the perspective of foster children. Children and Youth Services Review, 29(1), pp. 122-137.
    • Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Translated from the Russian; edited by Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., and Souberman, S. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.
    • Wade, J. (2008) The Ties that Bind: Support from Birth Families and Substitute Families for Young People Leaving Care. British Journal of Social Work, 38(1), pp.39-54.
    • Wade, J. and Dixon, J. (2006) Making a home, finding a job: investigating early housing and employment outcomes for young people leaving care. Child & Family Social Work 11(3), pp. 199-208.
    • Walker, M., Hill, M. and Triseliotis, J. (2002) Testing the limits of foster care: Fostering as an alternative to secure accommodation. London: BAAF.
    • Walkerdine, V. (2004) Developmental psychology and the study of childhood. In: Kehily. M., ed. An Introduction to Childhood Studies. Maidenhead: Open University Press, pp. 96-107.
    • Ward, H., Skuse, T. and Munro, E. (2005) „The best of times, the worst of times‟: young people‟s views of care and accommodation. Adoption & Fostering, 29(1), pp. 8-17.
    • Wendt, S. and Boylan, J. (2008) Feminist social work research engaging with post structural ideas. International Social Work, 51(5), pp. 599-609.
    • White, S. (2006) The Mental Health Needs of Looked After Children. In: Dunnett, K., ed. Health of looked after children and young people. Dorset: Russell House, .pp. 78-79.
    • White, V. (2006) The state of feminist social work. Abingdon: Routledge.
    • Wigfall, V. and Cameron, C. (2006) Promoting young people‟s participation in research. In: Chase, E., Simon, A. and Jackson, S., eds. In Care and After: A Positive Perspective. London: Routledge, pp. 152-168.
    • Willis, R. and Holland, S. (2009) Life story work: Reflections on the experience by looked after young people. Adoption & Fostering, 33(4), pp. 44-52.
    • Wilson, K., Petrie, S. and Sinclair, I. (2003) A Kind of Loving: A Model of Effective Foster Care. British Journal of Social Work, 33(8), pp. 991-1003.
    • Winter, K. (2006) Widening our knowledge concerning young looked after children: the case for research using sociological models of childhood. Child & Family Social Work, 11(1), pp. 55-64.
    • Wulczyn, F. and Zimmerman, E. (2005) Sibling placements in longitudinal perspective. Children and Youth Services Review, 27(7), pp. 741-763.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article