LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Bussières, André E; Patey, Andrea M; Francis, Jill J; Sales, Anne E; Grimshaw, Jeremy M (2012)
Publisher: BioMed Central
Journal: Implementation Science : IS
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: R5-920, Social/professional role and identity, Radiography, Theoretical domains framework, X-ray guidelines, Research, RA, Content analysis, Back pain, Focus groups, Medicine (General), Social influence, Chiropractors

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: humanities

Abstract

Background

The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was developed to investigate determinants of specific clinical behaviors and inform the design of interventions to change professional behavior. This framework was used to explore the beliefs of chiropractors in an American Provider Network and two Canadian provinces about their adherence to evidence-based recommendations for spine radiography for uncomplicated back pain. The primary objective of the study was to identify chiropractors’ beliefs about managing uncomplicated back pain without x-rays and to explore barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based recommendations on lumbar spine x-rays. A secondary objective was to compare chiropractors in the United States and Canada on their beliefs regarding the use of spine x-rays.

Methods

Six focus groups exploring beliefs about managing back pain without x-rays were conducted with a purposive sample. The interview guide was based upon the TDF. Focus groups were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed by two independent assessors using thematic content analysis based on the TDF.

Results

Five domains were identified as likely relevant. Key beliefs within these domains included the following: conflicting comments about the potential consequences of not ordering x-rays (risk of missing a pathology, avoiding adverse treatment effects, risks of litigation, determining the treatment plan, and using x-ray-driven techniques contrasted with perceived benefits of minimizing patient radiation exposure and reducing costs; beliefs about consequences); beliefs regarding professional autonomy, professional credibility, lack of standardization, and agreement with guidelines widely varied ( social/professional role & identity); the influence of formal training, colleagues, and patients also appeared to be important factors ( social influences); conflicting comments regarding levels of confidence and comfort in managing patients without x-rays ( belief about capabilities); and guideline awareness and agreements ( knowledge).

Conclusions

Chiropractors’ use of diagnostic imaging appears to be influenced by a number of factors. Five key domains may be important considering the presence of conflicting beliefs, evidence of strong beliefs likely to impact the behavior of interest, and high frequency of beliefs. The results will inform the development of a theory-based survey to help identify potential targets for behavioral-change strategies.

  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Isaacs DM, Marinac J, Sun C: Radiograph use in low back pain: a United States Emergency Department database analysis. Emergency med 2004, 26:37-45.
    • 2. Williams CM, Maher CG, Hancock MJ, McAuley JH, McLachlan AJ, Britt H, Fahridin S, Harrison C, Latimer J: Low back pain and best practice care: a survey of general practice physicians. Arch Intern Med 2010, 170:271-277.
    • 3. Ferriman A: UK rate of x ray examination less than half the US rate. BMJ 2001, 322:384d.
    • 4. Chou R, Fu R, Carrino JA, Deyo RA: Imaging strategies for low-back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2009, 373:463-472.
    • 5. Ammendolia C, Bombardier C, Hogg-Johnson S, Glazier R: Views on radiography use for patients with acute low back pain among chiropractors in an Ontario community. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2002, 25:511-520.
    • 6. Ammendolia C, Hogg-Johnson S, Pennick V, Glazier R, Bombardier C: Implementing evidence-based guidelines for radiography in acute low back pain: a pilot study in a chiropractic community. J J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2004, 27:170-179.
    • 7. Assendelft W, Pfeifle C, Bouter L: Chiropractic in The Netherlands: a survey of Dutch chiropractors. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1995, 18:129-134.
    • 8. Carey TS, Garrett J: North Carolina back pain project. Patterns of ordering diagnostic tests for patients with acute low back pain. Ann Intern Med 1996, 125:807-813.
    • 9. Ernst E: Chiropractors' use of X-rays. Br J Radiol 1998, 71:249-251.
    • 10. Scheurmier N, Breen AC: A pilot study of the purchase of manipulation services for acute low back pain in the United Kingdom. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1998, 21:14-18.
    • 11. de González Berrington A, Darby S: Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 2004, 363:345-351.
    • 12. Chou R, Qaseem A, Owens DK, Shekelle P: Physicians ftCGCotACo: Diagnostic Imaging for Low Back Pain: Advice for High-Value Health Care From the American College of Physicians. Ann Internal Med 2011, 154:181-189.
    • 13. Open Clinical: Clinical practice guidelines. In Open clinical knowledge, management for medical care. London: Lincoln's Inn Fields; 2002. http:// www.openclinical.org/guidelines.
    • 14. Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V, Casey D, Cross J, Shekelle P, Owens D: Australian Acute Musculoskeletal Pain Guidelines Group. Evidence-Based Managment of Acute Musculoskeletal Pain Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Internal Med 2003, 147:478-491.
    • 15. Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V, Casey D, Cross JT Jr, Shekelle P, Owens DK, Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee of the American College of P, American College of P, American Pain Society Low Back Pain Guidelines P: Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Internal Med 2007, 147:478-491.
    • 16. Sevigny P, Kunteze S, Watson P, Underwood M, Ritchie G, Cotterell, et al: Low back pain early management of persistent non-specific low back pain. London: National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care and Royal College of General Practitioners; 2009.
    • 17. Ammendolia C: Radiographic anomalies that may alter chiropractic intervention strategies found in a New Zealand population. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2005, 28:375.
    • 18. Ammendolia C, Cote P, Hogg-Johnson S, Bombardier C: Do chiropractors adhere to guidelines for back radiographs? A study of chiropractic teaching clinics in Canada. Spine 2007, 32:2509-2514.
    • 19. Ammendolia C, Taylor JAM, Pennick V, Cote P, Hogg-Johnson S, Bombardier C: Adherence to radiography guidelines for low back pain: a survey of chiropractic schools worldwide. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2008, 31:412-418.
    • 20. Bussières AE, Peterson C, Taylor JAM: Diagnostic imaging practice guidelines for musculoskeletal complaints in adults-an evidence-based approach: introduction. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2007, 30:617-683.
    • 21. Nyiendo J, Haas M, Goldberg B, Sexton G: Patient characteristics and physicians' practice activities for patients with chronic low back pain: A practice-based study of primary care and chiropractic physicians. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2001, 24:92-100.
    • 22. Nyiendo J, Haas M, Goodwin P: Patient characteristics, practice activities, and one-month outcomes for chronic, recurrent low-back pain treated by chiropractors and family medicine physicians: A practice-based feasibility study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2000, 23:239-245.
    • 23. Iron K, Jaakkimainen L, Rothwell D, Ping L, Laupacis A: Investigation of acute lower back pain in Ontario: Are guidelines being followed? Toronto, Ontario: ICES; 2004. http://www.ices.on.ca/file/ACFF.pdf.
    • 24. Hurwitz EL, Coulter ID, Adams AH: Use of chiropractic services from 1985 through 1991 in the United States and Canada. Am J Public Health 1998, 88:771-776.
    • 25. Carey TS, Garrett J, Jackman A, McLaughlin C, Fryer J, Smucker DR: The Outcomes and Costs of Care for Acute Low Back Pain among Patients Seen by Primary Care Practitioners, Chiropractors, and Orthopedic Surgeons. New Engl J Med 1995, 333:913-917.
    • 26. Cherkin C, MacCornack F, Berg A: Managing low back pain. A comparison of the beliefs and behaviours of family physicians and chiropractors. West J Med 1988, 149:475-480.
    • 27. Aker P, Bombardier C, Jansz G, Bressler H: Chiropractic management of low back pain: a survey of Ontario chiropractors. Second International Forum for Primary Care Research on Low Back Pain; May 30-31; 1997. The Netherlands: The Hague; 1998.
    • 28. Bussières AE, Taylor JAM, Peterson C: Diagnostic imaging practice guidelines for musculoskeletal complaints in adults-an evidence-based approach-part 3: spinal disorders. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2008, 31:33-88.
    • 29. Grimshaw JM, Eccles M, Thomas R, MacLennan G, Ramsay C, Fraser C, Vale L: Toward evidence-based quality improvement. Evidence (and its limitations) of the effectiveness of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies 1966-1998. J Gen Intern Med 2006, 21(Suppl 2): S14-S20.
    • 30. Solomon DH, Hashimoto H, Daltroy L, Liang MH: Techniques to improve physicians' use of diagnostic tests: a new conceptual framework. JAMA 1998, 280:2020-2027.
    • 31. Farmer AP, Légaré F, Turcot L, Grimshaw J, Harvey E, McGowan J, Wolf Fredric J: Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008, 3:CD004398.
    • 32. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay CR, Vale L, Whitty P, Eccles MP, Matowe L, Shirran L, et al: Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess (Winchester, England) 2004, 8:iii-iiv. 1-72.
    • 33. Cabana M, Rand C, Powe N, Wu A, Wilson M, Abboud P, Rubin H: Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999, 282:1458-1465.
    • 34. Shaw B, Cheater F, Baker R, Gillies C, Hearnshaw H, Flottorp S, Robertson N: Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005, 3:CD005470.
    • 35. Wensing M, Grol RM: Determinants of effective change. In Improving patient care. Edited by Grol R. Butterworth, Heinemann: The implementation of change in clinical practice Edinburgh Elsevier; 2005:94-108.
    • 36. Légaré F: Assessing barriers and facilitators to knowledge use. In Knowledge translation in health care Moving from evidence to practice. Edited by Straus S, Tetroe J, Graham ID.: Wiley-Blackwell, BMJI Books; 2009:83-93.
    • 37. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, Robinson N: Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? J Contin Edu Health Prof 2006, 26:13-24.
    • 38. Baker R, Lecouturier J, Bond S: Explaining variation in GP referral rates for x-rays for back pain. Implementation Sci 2006, 1:15.
    • 39. Carey TS, Garrett J: Patterns of ordering diagnostic tests for patients with acute low back pain. The North Carolina Back Pain Project. Ann Internal Med 1996, 125:807-814.
    • 40. Little P, Cantrell T, Roberts L, Chapman J, Langridge J, Pickering R: Why do GPs perform investigations?: the medical and social agendas in arranging back X-rays. Fam Pract 1998, 15:264-265.
    • 41. Shye D, Freeborn DK, Romeo J, Eraker S: Understanding physicians' imaging test use in low back pain care: the role of focus groups. Qual Health Care 1998, 10:83-91.
    • 42. Ryynanen OP, Lehtovirta J, Soimakallio S, Takala J: General practitioners' willingness to request plain lumbar spine radiographic examinations. Eur J Radiol 2001, 37:47-53.
    • 43. Espeland A, Baerheim A: Factors affecting general practitioners' decisions about plain radiography for back pain: implications for classification of guideline barriers - a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2003, 3:8.
    • 44. McKenzie J, French S, O'Connor D, Grimshaw J, Mortimer D, Michie S, Francis J, Spike N, Schattner P, Kent P, et al: IMPLEmenting a clinical practice guideline for acute low back pain evidence-based manageMENT in general practice (IMPLEMENT): Cluster randomised controlled trial study protocol. Implementation Sci 2008, 3:11.
    • 45. Di Iorio D, Henley E, Doughty A: A survey of primary care physician practice patterns and adherence to acute low back problem guidelines. Arch Fam Med 2000, 9:1015-1021.
    • 46. Chenot J, Scherer M, Becker A, Donner-Banzhoff N, Baum E, Leonhardt C, Keller S, Pfingsten M, Hildebrandt J, Basler H, Kochen M: Acceptance and perceived barriers of implementing a guideline for managing low back in general practice. Implementation Sci 2008, 3:7.
    • 47. Phillips R: Plain film radiology in chiropractic. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1992, 15:47-50.
    • 48. McKenzie J, O'Connor D, Page M, Mortimer D, French S, Walker B, Keating J, Grimshaw J, Michie S, Francis J, Green S: Improving the care for people with acute low-back pain by allied health professionals (the ALIGN trial): A cluster randomised trial protocol. Implementation Sci 2010, 5:86.
    • 49. Kok G, Schaalma H, Ruiter RAC, van Empelen P, Brug J: Intervention mapping: protocol for applying health psychology theory to prevention programmes. Health Psychol 2004, 9:85-98.
    • 50. Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G: Intervention mapping: a process for developing theory- and evidence-based health education programs. Health Educ Behav 1998, 25:545-563.
    • 51. Foy R, Francis J, Johnston M, Eccles M, Lecouturier J, Bamford C, Grimshaw J: The development of a theory-based intervention to promote appropriate disclosure of a diagnosis of dementia. BMC Health Serv Res 2007, 7:207.
    • 52. Etches V, Frank J, Di Ruggeiro E, Manuel D: Measuring population health: a review of indicators. Annu Rev Public Health 2006, 27:29-55.
    • 53. Graham ID, Tetroe J: KT TRG: Some theoretical underpinnings of knowledge translation. Acad Emerg Med 2007, 14:936-941.
    • 54. Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M: Improving patient care. The implementation of change in clinical practice. Butterworth, Heinemann: Edinburgh Elsevier; 2005:290.
    • 55. Grol R: Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Med Care 2003, 39:46-54.
    • 56. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M: Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008, 337:a1655.
    • 57. National Cancer Institute, U.S. National Institutes of Health: Theory at a glance. A guide for health promotion practice. In National Cancer Institute (U.S.), Publication No. 05-3896. Edited by Glanz K, Rimer BK.; 2005. http:// www.cancer.gov/PDF/481f5d53-63df-41bc-bfaf-aa48ee1da4d/TAAG3.pdf.
    • 58. Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A: Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Quality & Safety In Health Care 2005, 14:26-33.
    • 59. Francis J, O'Connor D, Curran J: Theories of behaviour change synthesised into a set of theoretical groupings: introducing a thematic series on the theoretical domains framework. Implementation Sci 2012, 7:35.
    • 60. Kamberelis G, Dimitraidis G: Focus groups: Strategic articulations of pedagogy, politics, and inquiry. In Handbook of qualitative research 3rd ed Thousand Oakes. Edited by Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. CA: Sage; 2005:887-907.
    • 61. Morgan D, Kreuger R: When to use focus groups and why'. In Successful Focus Groups. Edited by Morgan DL. London: Sage; 1993.
    • 62. Kitzinger J: Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ 1995, 311:299-302.
    • 63. Bishop A, Thomas E, Foster NE: Health care practitioners' attitudes and beliefs about low back pain: A systematic search and critical review of available measurement tools. Pain 2007, 132:91-101.
    • 64. Pincus T, Foster NE, Vogel S, Santos R, Breen A, Underwood M: Attitudes to back pain amongst musculoskeletal practitioners: A comparison of professional groups and practice settings using the ABS-mp. Manual Ther 2007, 12:167-175.
    • 65. Biggs L, Mierau D, Hay D: Measuring philosophy: a philosophy index. J Can Chiropr Assoc 2002, 46:173-184.
    • 66. Francis J, Stockton C, Eccles M, Johnston M, Cuthbertson B, Grimshaw J, Hyde C, Tinmouth A, Stanworth S: Evidence-based selection of theories for designing behaviour change interventions: using methods based on theoretical construct domains to understand clinicians' blood transfusion behaviour. Br J Health Psychol 2009, 14:625.
    • 67. Francis J, Tinmouth A, Stanworth S, Grimshaw J, Johnston M, Hyde C, Stockton C, Brehaut J, Fergusson D, Eccles M: Using theories of behaviour to understand transfusion prescribing in three clinical contexts in two countries: Development work for an implementation trial. Implementation Sci 2009, 4:70.
    • 68. Bogdan R, Biklen SK: Fieldwork. In Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods: International Edition, 5th ed. Boston: Pearson Higher Education; 2007:320.
    • 69. Hsieh H, Shannon S: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005, 15:1277-1288.
    • 70. Francis J, Johnston M, Robertson C, Glidewella L, Entwistle V, Eccles M, Grimshawe J: What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health 2010, 25:1229-1245.
    • 71. National Board of Chiropractic Examininers: The Chiropractic Practitioner. Chapter 7. In Practice Analysis of Chiropractic.; 2010. http://www.nbce.org/ publication/job-analysis.html.
    • 72. Intellipulse Pamr: Canadian Chiropractic Resources Databank 2007 - National Report.; 2007:98.
    • 73. Francke A, Smit M, de Veer A, Mistiaen P: Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008, 8:11.
    • 74. Fullen BM, Baxter GD, O'Donovan BGG, Doody C, Daly LE, Hurley DA: Factors impacting on doctors' management of acute low back pain: A systematic review. Euro Journal Pain 2009, 13:908-914.
    • 75. Saillour-Glenisson F, Michel P: Individual and collective facilitators of and barriers to the use of clinical practice guidelines by physicians: a literature review. Revue Épidémiol Santé Publique 2003, 51:65-80.
    • 76. Fullen BM, Baxter GD, O'Donovan BGG, Doody C, Daly L, Hurley DA: Doctors' attitudes and beliefs regarding acute low back pain management: A systematic review. Pain 2008, 136:388-396.
    • 77. Corbett M, Foster N, Ong BN: GP attitudes and self-reported behaviour in primary care consultations for low back pain. Family Pract 2009, 26:359-364.
    • 78. Cochrane L, Olson C, Murray S, Dupuis M, Tooman T, Hayes S: Gaps between knowing and doing: understanding and assessing the barriers to optimal health care. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2007, 27:94-102.
    • 79. Schers H, Wensing M, Huijsmans Z, van Tulder M, Grol R: Implementation barriers for general practice guidelines on low back pain. A qualitative study. Spine 2001, 26:E348-E353.
    • 80. Kaptchuk TJ, Eisenberg DM: Chiropractic: Origins, Controversies, and Contributions. Arch Intern Med 1998, 158:2215-2224.
    • 81. Yvonne V-R: Caught in the crosshairs: Identity and cultural authority within chiropractic. Social Science & Med 2011, 72:1826-1837.
    • 82. Godin G, Belanger-Gravel A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J: Healthcare professionals' intentions and behaviours: A systematic review of studies based on social cognitive theories. Implementation Sci 2008, 3:36.
    • 83. 6 APUR: Treatment Form Waiver Program 12. In Clinical Quality Management. Reviewed and adopted.; 2010. http://www.ashcompanies.com/ WCMGenerated/Treatment_Form_Waiver_Program_tcm19-41654.pdf.
    • 84. Hendee WR, Becker GJ, Borgstede JP, Bosma J, Casarella WJ, Erickson BA, Maynard CD, Thrall JH, Wallner PE: Addressing overutilization in medical imaging. Radiology 2010, 257:240-245.
    • 85. Carlsen B, Glenton C: What about N? A methodological study of samplesize reporting in focus group studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011, 11:26.
    • 86. Mays N, Pope C: Qualitative Research: Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ 1995, 311:109-112.
    • 87. Espeland A, Baerheim A, Albrektsen G, Korsbrekke K, Larsen JL: Patients' views on importance and usefulness of plain radiography for low back pain. Spine 2001, 26:1356-1363.
    • 88. Légaré F, Ratté S, Stacey D, Kryworuchko J, Gravel K, Graham I, Turcotte S: Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010, 5:CD006732.
    • 89. Cane J, O'Connor D, Michie S: Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implementation Sci 2012, 7:37.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article