LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Vasilakis, Christos; El-Darzi, Elia; Chountas, Panagiotis
Publisher: IEEE Computer Society
Languages: English
Types: Part of book or chapter of book
Subjects: UOW3
Discrete event simulation modelling has been extensively\ud used in modelling complex systems. Although it offers\ud great conceptual-modelling flexibility, it is both computationally expensive and data intensive. There are several examples of simulation models that generate millions of observations to achieve satisfactory point and confidence interval estimations for the model variables. In these cases, it is exceptionally cumbersome to conduct the required output and sensitivity analysis in a spreadsheet or statistical package. In this paper, we highlight the advantages of employing data warehousing techniques for storing and analyzing simulation output data. The proposed data warehouse environment is capable of providing the means for automating the necessary algorithms and procedures for estimating different parameters of the simulation. These include initial transient in steady-state simulations and point and confidence interval estimations. Previously developed models for evaluating patient flow through hospital epartments are used to demonstrate the problem and the proposed solutions.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alexopoulos, C. and D. Goldsman. 2003. To Batch or Not to Batch. In Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, eds. S. Chick, P. J. Sánchez, D. Ferrin and D. J. Morrice, 481-489. Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
    • Alexopoulos, C. and A. F. Seila. 1998. Output Data Analysis. In Handbook of simulation: principles, methodology, advances, applications and practice, ed J. Banks, 225-272. New York: Wiley.
    • Banks, J. 1997. The Future of Simulation Software: A Panel Discussion. In Proceedings of the 1997 Winter Simulation Conference, eds. S. Andradottir, K. J. Healy, D. H. Withers and B. L. Nelson, 1155-1162. Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
    • Banks, J., J. S. I. Carson and B. L. Nelson. 2001. Discreteevent system simulation. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    • Chaudhuri, S., U. Dayal and V. Ganti. 2001. Database Technology for Decision Support Systems. Computer 34(12): 48-55.
    • Codd, E. F., S. B. Codd and C. T. Salley. 1993. Providing OLAP to User-Analysts: An IT Mandate. Sunnyvale, California: E.F. Codd & Associates.
    • Connoly, T. and C. Begg. 2002. Database Systems, A practical approach to Design, Implementation , and Management. Essex: Addison-Wesley.
    • El-Darzi, E., C. Vasilakis, T. Chaussalet and P. H. Millard. 2000. A Simulation model to evaluate the interaction between acute, rehabilitation, long-stay care and the community. In Decision Making: Recent Developments and Worldwide Applications, eds. S. H. Zanakis, G. Doukidis and C. Zopounidis, 475-485. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Kimball, R. 1998. The data warehouse lifecycle toolkit: expert methods for designing, developing, and deploying data warehouses. New York: Wiley.
    • Koutsoukis, N.-S., G. Mitra and C. Lucas. 1999. Adapting on-line analytical processing for decision modelling: the interaction of information and decision technologies. Decision Support Systems 26(1): 1-30.
    • Law, M. A. and W. D. Kelton. 2000. Simulation Modelling and Analysis. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
    • Pidd, M. 1998. Computer simulation in management science. Chichester: Wiley.
    • Robinson, S. 2002. A Statistical Process Control Appoach for Estimating the Warm-Up Period. In Proceedings of the 2002 Winter Simulation Conference, eds. E. Yücesan, C.-H. Chen, J. L. Snowdon and J. M. Charnes, 439-446. Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
    • Spofford, G. 2001. MDX Solutions with Microsoft SQL Server Analysis Services. USA: John Wiley & Sons.
    • Thomas, H. and A. Datta. 2001. A conceptual model and algebra for on-line analytical processing in decision support databases. Information Systems Research 12(1): 83-102.
    • Vasilakis, C. 2003. Simulating the flow of patients: an OLAP-enabled decision support framework. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Westminster, London.
    • Vasilakis, C. and E. El-Darzi. 2001. A simulation study of the winter bed crisis. Health Care Management Science 4(1): 31-36.
    • Vasilakis, C., E. El-Darzi and P. Chountas. 2004. An OLAP-enabled environment for modelling patient flow. Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering forthcoming.
    • Vassiliadis, P. and T. Sellis. 1999. A survey of logical models for OLAP databases. ACM SIGMOD Record 28(4): 64-69.
    • Welch, P. 1983. The statistical analysis of simulation results. In Computer Performance Modeling Handbook, ed S. Lavenberg, 268-328. New York: Academic Press.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article