Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
King, D (2015)
Publisher: Pergamon Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
The relevance of academic research to organizational practice is increasingly a concern for management scholars (Currie, Knights, & Starkey, 2010; Starkey & Madan, 2001), and wider social scientists (Chatterton, Hodkinson, & Pickerill, 2010). In particular there have been calls for "engaged scholarship" (Van de Ven, 2007) to "bridge the relevance gap" (Rynes, Bartunek, & Daft, 2001) and create meaningful knowledge that is relevant and useful for practice (for a debate see Boyer, 1997; Deetz, 2008; Learmonth, Lockett, & Dowd, 2012; Van de Ven, 2007; Zundel & Kokkalis, 2010). Such concerns about relevance have also become prevalent within critical management studies (CMS), with regular calls for critical academics to intervene in organizational practice (see for instance Alvesson & Spicer, 2012; Clegg, Kornberger, Carter, & Rhodes, 2006; Koss Hartmann, 2014; Voronov, 2008; Walsh & Weber, 2002; Willmott, 2008; Wolfram Cox, Voronov, LeTrent-Jones, & Weir, 2009). Recently this has been labelled the "performative turn" (Spicer, Alvesson, & Kärreman, 2009) in which critical scholars seek make their work more relevant to organizations (Wickert & Schaefer, 2014, p. 19). Yet, despite the regularity of these calls for intervention, there have been few actual examples of engagement by critical scholars directly into management practice. Without such examples, our understanding of the possibilities of engagement by critical scholars into practice is thus limited, and CMS is left susceptible to the criticism that it is more comfortable discussing radicalism than actually intervening (Koss Hartmann, 2014).
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Adler, P. S. (2002). Critique in the Name of Whom and What? Organization, 9, 387-395.
    • Adler, P. S., Forbes, L. C., & Willmott, H. (2007). Critical Management Studies. In J. P. Walsh & A. Brief, P. (Eds.), Academy of Management Annals (Vol. 1, pp. 119-179). London: Taylor & Francis Group.
    • Akella, D. (2008). A reflection on critical management studies. Journal of Management and Organization, 14, 100-110.
    • Alvesson, M. (2009). At-home ethnography struggling with closeness and closure. In S. Ybema, D. Yanow, H. Wels & Kamsteeg (Eds.), Organizational ethnography (pp. 156-174). London: Sage.
    • Alvesson, M., Bridgman, T., & Willmott, H. (2009) The Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (2000). Doing Critical Management Research. London: Sage Publication.
    • Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2012). Critical leadership studies: The case for critical performativity. Human Relations, 65, 367-390.
    • Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (1992a) Critical Management Studies, London: Sage.
    • Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (1992b). On the idea of emancipation in management and organization studies. Academy of Management Review, 17, 432-364.
    • Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (1996). Making Sense of Management; A critical introduction. London: Sage.
    • Barros, M. (2010). Emancipatory Management: The Contradiction Between Practice and Discourse. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, 166-184.
    • Bell, E., & King, D. (2010). The Elephant in the Room: Critical Management Studies Conferences as a Site of Body Pedagogics. Management Learning, 41, 429-442.
    • Bochner, A. P., & Ellis, C. (2002) Ethnographically speaking: Autoethnography, literature and aesthetics, Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
    • Boje, D. (1998). Nike, Greek goddess of victory or cruelty? Women's stories of Asian factory life. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11, 461-480.
    • Boyer, E. L. (1997). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton: The Carneigie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
    • Bristow, A. (2012). On life, death and radical critique: A non-survival guide to the Brave New Higher Education for the intellectually pregnant. Scandinavian journal of management, 28, 234-241.
    • Brunwick, T., & Coghlan, D. (2007). In Defence of Being "Native": The case for insider academic research. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 59-74.
    • Burrell, G. (2009). Handbooks, Swarms and Living Dangerously. In M. Alvesson, T. Bridgman & H. Willmott (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies (pp. 551-562). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Cameron, J., & Gibson, K. (2005). Participatory action research in a poststructuralist vein. Geoforum, 36, 315-331.
    • Chatterton, P., Fuller, D., & Routledge, P. (2007). Relating action to activism: theoretical and methodological reflections. In S. Kindon, R. Pain & M. Kesby (Eds.), Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods; Connecting people, participation and place (pp. 216-222). London: Routledge.
    • Chatterton, P., Hodkinson, S., & Pickerill, J. (2010). Beyond Scholarly Activism: Making Strategic Interventions Inside and Outside the Neoliberal University. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 10, 245-275.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article