LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Van Der Zee, Sophie; Anderson, Ross; Poppe, Ronald (2016)
Publisher: Frontiers Media S.A.
Journal: Frontiers in Psychology
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: MTurk, Psychology, deception, dishonesty, Z415, Original Research, Z261, insurance fraud, Z471, rejection
Fraud is a pervasive and challenging problem that costs society large amounts of money. By no means all fraud is committed by ‘professional criminals’: much is done by ordinary people who indulge in small-scale opportunistic deception. In this paper, we set out to investigate when people behave dishonestly, for example by committing fraud, in an online context. We conducted three studies to investigate how the rejection of one’s efforts, operationalized in different ways, affected the amount of cheating and information falsification. Study 1 demonstrated that people behave more dishonestly when rejected. Studies 2 and 3 were conducted in order to disentangle the confounding factors of the nature of the rejection and the financial rewards that are usually associated with dishonest behavior. It was demonstrated that rejection in general, rather than the nature of a rejection, caused people to behave more dishonestly. When a rejection was based on subjective grounds, dishonest behavior increased with approximately 10%, but this difference was not statistically significant. We subsequently measured whether dishonesty was driven by the financial loss associated with rejection, or emotional factors such as a desire for revenge. We found that rejected participants were just as dishonest when their cheating did not led to financial gain. However, they felt stronger emotions when there was no money involved. This seems to suggest that upon rejection, emotional involvement, especially a reduction in happiness, drives dishonest behavior more strongly than a rational cost-benefit analysis. These results indicate that rejection causes people to behave more dishonestly, specifically in online settings. Firms wishing to deter customers and employees from committing fraud may therefore benefit from transparency and clear policy guidelines, discouraging people to submit claims that are likely to be rejected.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alanezi, F., and Brooks, L. (2014). “Combatting online fraud in Saudi Arabia using general deterrence theory,” in Proceeding of the 20th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Savannah, GA.
    • Anderson, R., Barton, C., Böhme, R., Clayton, R., van Eeten, M. J. G., and Levi, M. (2012). “The economics of information security and privacy,” in Measuring the Cost of Cybercrime, eds R. Böhme (Berlin: Springer)
    • Ariely, D. (2012). The Honest Truth about Dishonesty: How we lie to Everyone - Especially Ourselves. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
    • Aronson, E. (1969). “The theory of cognitive dissonance: a current perspective,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. L. Berkowitz (New York, NY: Academic Press), 1-34.
    • Barkan, R., Ayal, S., and Ariely, D. (2015). Ethical dissonance, justifications, and moral behavior. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 6, 157-161. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.08.001
    • Barter, C., Renold, E., Berridge, D., and Cawson, P. (2004). Peer Violence in Children's Residential Care. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Baumeister, R. F., and Tice, D. M. (1990). Point-counterpoints: anxiety and social exclusion. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 9, 165-195. doi: 10.1521/jscp.1990.9. 2.165
    • Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., and Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk. Polit. Anal. 20, 351-368. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpr057
    • Bies, R. J., and Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgments: the influence of causal accounts. Soc. Justice Res. 1, 199-218. doi: 10.1007/BF01048016
    • Blasi, A. (1980). Bridging moral cognition and moral action: a critical review of the literature. Psychol. Bull. 88, 1-45. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9185-9
    • Button, M., Lewis, C., and Tapley, J. (2014). Not a victimless crime: the impact of fraud on individual victims and their families. Security J. 27, 36-54. doi: 10.1057/sj.2012.11
    • Centre for Counter Fraud Studies (2014). Counter Fraud 2020: A Twelve Point Plan to Protect the UK. Portsmouth: Centre for Counter Fraud Studies.
    • Cross, C. (2013). “Nobody's holding a gun to your head. . .” examining current discourses surrounding victims of online fraud crime, justice and social democracy,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference, Crime and Justice Research Centre, eds R. Kelly and T. Juan (Brisbane, QLD: Queensland University of Technology), 25-32.
    • Derrig, R. A. (2002). Insurance fraud. J. Risk Insur. 69, 271-287. doi: 10.1111/1539- 6975.00026
    • Egelman, S., Molnar, D., Christin, N., Acquisti, A., Herley, C., and Krishnamurthi, S. (2010). “Please continue to hold: an empirical study on user tolerance of security delays,” in Proceeding of the 9th Workshop on Economics of Information Security, Cambridge, MA.
    • Eich, E. (1995). Searching for mood dependent memory. Psychol. Sci. 6, 67-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00309.x
    • Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    • Gee, J., and Button, M. (2013). The Financial Cost of Fraud Report 2013. Portsmouth: BDO LLP. Available at: http://www.bdo.co.uk/_data/assets/pdf_file/0004/16942/The-Financial-Costof-Fraud.pdf
    • Gino, F., and Ariely, D. (2012). The dark side of creativity: original thinkers can be more dishonest. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 102, 445-459. doi: 10.1037/a00 26406
    • Gino, F., Ayal, S., and Ariely, D. (2009). Contagion and differentiation in unethical behaviour: the effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psychol. Sci. 20, 393-398. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02306.x
    • Gino, F., Norton, M. I., and Ariely, D. (2010). The counterfeit self: the deceptive costs of faking it. Psychol. Sci. 21, 712-720. doi: 10.1177/09567976103 66545
    • Greenberg, J. (1993). Stealing in the name of justice: informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 54, 81-103. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1993.1004
    • Hegtvedt, K. A., and Killian, C. (1999). Fairness and emotions: reactions to the process and outcomes of negotiations. Soc. Forces 78, 269-302. doi: 10.2307/3005797
    • Houser, D., Vetter, S., and Winter, J. (2012). Fairness and cheating. Eur. Econ. Rev. 56, 1645-1655. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.08.001
    • Hughes, R. (1998). Considering the vignette techniques and its application to a study of drug injecting and HIV risk and safer behaviour. Sociol. Health Illness 20, 381-400. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1993.1004
    • Hughes, R., and Huby, M. (2002). The application of vignettes in social and nursing research. J. Adv. Nurs. 37, 382-386. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02100.x
    • Josephson Institute of Ethics (2012). 2012 Report card on the ethics of American youth. Available at: http:charactercounts.org/programs/reportcard [accessed on 12 September, 2014].
    • Kline, R., Galeotti, F., and Orsini, R. (2014). “When foul play seems fair: dishonesty as a response to violations of just deserts,” in Proceedings of the Quaderni - Working Paper DSE (920), Department of Economics, University of Bologna, Bologna.
    • Kouchaki, M., and Desai, S. D. (2014). Anxious, threatened, and also unethical: how anxiety makes individuals feel threatened, and commit unethical acts. J. Appl. 100, 360-375. doi: 10.1037/a0037796
    • Kouchaki, M., and Smith, I. H. (2014). The morning morality effect: the influence of time of day on unethical behavior. Psychol. Sci. 25, 95-102. doi: 10.1177/0956797613498099
    • Kouchaki, M., and Wareham, J. (2015). Excluded and behaving unethically: social exclusion, physiological responses, and unethical behavior. J. Appl. Psychol. 100, 547-556. doi: 10.1037/a0038034
    • Leary, M. R. (1990). Responses to social exclusion: social anxiety, jealousy, loneliness, depression, and low self-esteem. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 9, 221-229. doi: 10.1521/jscp.1990.9.2.221
    • Lerman, L. G. (2002). The slippery slope from ambition to greed to dishonesty: lawyers, money and professional integrity. Hofstra Law Rev. 30, 1-44.
    • Malheiros, M., Preibusch, S., and Sasse, M. A. (2013). “Fairly truthful”: the impact of perceived effort, fairness, relevance, and sensitivity on personal data disclosure. Trust Trustworthy Comput. 7904, 250-266. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642- 38908-5_19
    • Massi, L. L. (2005). Anticipated guilt as behavioral motivation. Hum. Commun. Res. 31, 453-481. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2005.tb00879.x
    • Mazar, N., Amir, O., and Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: a theory of self-concept maintenance. J. Market. 45, 633-653.
    • Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., and Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on amazon mechanical turk. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 5, 411-419.
    • Poulou, M. (2001). The role of vignettes in the research of emotional and behavioural difficulties. Emot. Behav. Difficult. 6, 50-62. doi: 10.1080/13632750100507655
    • Preacher, K. J., and Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40, 879-891. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
    • Purkait, S. (2012). Phishing counter measures and their effectiveness: literature review. Inform. Manag. Comput. Security 20, 382-420. doi: 10.1108/09685221211286548
    • Ruedy, N. E., Moore, C., Gino, F., and Schweitzer, M. (2013). The cheater's high: the unexpected affective benefits of unethical behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 105, 531-548. doi: 10.1037/a0034231
    • Schweitzer, M., and Gibson, D. (2008). Fairness, feelings, and ethical decision making: consequences of violating community standards of fairness. J. Bus. Ethics 77, 287-301. doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9350-3
    • Schweitzer, M., and Hsee, C. K. (2002). Stretching the truth: elastic justification and motivated communication of uncertain information. J. Risk Uncertainty 25, 185-201. doi: 10.1023/A:1020647814263
    • Schweitzer, M., Ordóñez, L., and Douma, B. (2004). Goal setting as a motivator of unethical behavior. Acad. Manag. J. 47, 422-432. doi: 10.2307/201 59591
    • Shalvi, S., Gino, F., Barkan, R., and Ayal, S. (2015). Self-serving justifications: doing wrong and feeling moral. Curr. Direct. Psychol. Sci. 24, 125-130. doi: 10.1177/0963721414553264
    • Shu, L. L., Mazar, N., Gino, F., Ariely, D., and Bazerman, M. H. (2012). Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 15197- 15200. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1209746109
    • Topham, G. (2014). Ryanair and EasyJet fined a total €1m in Italy for mis-selling travel insurance. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/feb/ 17/ryanair-easyjet-fined-travel-insurance [accessed on 12 September, 2014].
    • Van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., Vermunt, R., and Wilke, H. A. M. (1997). How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 72, 1034-1046. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1034
    • Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting Lies and Deceit: Pitfalls and Opportunities. Chichester: John Wiley and sons.
    • Vrij, A., Fisher, R. P., and Blank, H. (2015). A cognitive approach to lie detection: a meta-analysis. Legal Criminol. Psychol. doi: 10.1111/lcrp.12088
    • Zimbler, M., and Feldman, R. S. (2011). Liar, liar, hard drive on fire: how media context affects lying behavior. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 41, 2492-2507. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00827.x
    • Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., and Rosenthal, R. (1981). “Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 14, ed. L. Berkowitz (New York, NY: Academic Press), 1-57.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

Cite this article